skip navigation

Skip Nav

Clinical Guidelines Portal

skip navigation

Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection

Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents

(Last updated:2/12/2014; last reviewed:2/12/2014)

Panel's Recommendations

Panel's Recommendations

  • Strategies to maximize adherence should be discussed before initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and again before changing regimens (AIII).
  • Adherence to therapy must be stressed at each visit, along with continued exploration of strategies to maintain and/or improve adherence (AIII).
  • At least one method of measuring adherence to cART should be used in addition to monitoring viral load (AII).
  • When feasible, once-daily antiretroviral regimens should be utilized (AI*).
  • To improve and support adherence, providers should maintain a nonjudgmental attitude, establish trust with patients/caregivers, and identify mutually acceptable goals for care (AII*).
Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional
Rating of Evidence: I = One or more randomized trials in children with clinical outcomes and/or validated endpoints; I* = One or more randomized trials in adults with clinical outcomes and/or validated laboratory endpoints with accompanying data in children from one or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; II = One or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies in children with long-term outcomes; II* = One or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational studies in adults with long-term clinical outcomes with accompanying data in children from one or more similar nonrandomized trials or cohort studies with clinical outcome data; III = expert opinion
Studies that include children or children/adolescents, but not studies limited to post-pubertal adolescents

Background

Adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is a principal determinant of virolotgic suppression.1-4 Prospective adult and pediatric studies have established a direct correlation between risk of virologic failure and the proportion of missed doses of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs.5 Based on early work in HIV-infected adults treated with unboosted protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens,2 ≥95% adherence has been the threshold associated with complete viral suppression. More recent studies from adult populations suggest that the relationship between ARV adherence and viral suppression may vary with individual drug, drug class, and pattern of adherence.6 Viral suppression may be achieved with lower levels of adherence to boosted PI and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimens.6,7 In patients who achieve virologic suppression, the longer the duration of suppression the lower the level of adherence necessary to prevent viral rebound.8 Different patterns of inadequate adherence (intermittent missed doses, treatment interruptions) may have a differential impact on regimen efficacy, depending on the drug combination.9,10

Poor adherence can result in sub-therapeutic plasma ARV drug concentrations, facilitating development of drug resistance to one or more drugs in a given regimen, and possibly cross-resistance to other drugs in the same class. Multiple factors (including regimen potency, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, viral fitness, and the genetic barrier to ARV resistance) influence the adherence-resistance relationship.11 In addition to compromising the efficacy of the current regimen, suboptimal adherence has implications for limiting future effective drug regimens in patients who develop multidrug-resistant HIV and for increasing the risk of secondary transmission. 

Poor adherence to ARVs is commonly encountered in the treatment of HIV-infected children and adolescents. Multiple studies have reported that less than 50% of children and/or caretakers reported full adherence to prescribed regimens. Rates of adherence varied with method of ascertainment (parent/child report, pharmacy records), ARV regimens, and study characteristics.3,4,12-14 A variety of factors, including medication formulation, frequency of dosing, child age, and psychosocial and behavioral characteristics of children and parents have been associated with adherence; however, no consistent predictors of either good or poor adherence in children have been consistently identified.12,15-19 Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that adherence is not static and can vary with time on treatment.20 These findings illustrate the difficulty of maintaining high levels of adherence and underscore the need to work in partnership with families to ensure adherence education, support, and assessment as integral components of care.

Specific Adherence Issues in Children

Adherence is a complex health behavior that is influenced by the regimen prescribed, patient and family factors, and characteristics of health care providers.17 The limited availability of palatable formulations for young children is especially problematic.5,21 Furthermore, infants and children are dependent on others for administration of medication; thus, assessment of the capacity for adherence to a complex, multidrug regimen requires evaluation of the caregivers and their environments, as well as the ability and willingness of a child to take the drug. Barriers faced by adult caregivers that can contribute to non-adherence in children include forgetting doses, changes in routine, being too busy, and child refusal.22,23 Some caregivers may place too much responsibility for managing medications on older children before they are developmentally able to undertake such tasks,24 whereas others themselves face health and adherence challenges related to HIV infection or other medical conditions. Other barriers to adherence include caregivers’ unwillingness to disclose HIV infection status to the child and/or others, reluctance of caregivers to fill prescriptions locally, hiding or relabeling of medications to maintain secrecy within the household, avoidance of social support, and a tendency for doses to be missed if the parent is unavailable. Adherence may also be jeopardized by social issues within a family (e.g., substance abuse, unstable housing, and involvement with the criminal justice system).

Specific Adherence Issues in Adolescents

HIV-infected adolescents also face specific adherence challenges.25,26 Several studies have identified pill burden as well as lifestyle issues (i.e., not having medications on hand when away from home, change in schedule) as significant barriers to effective adherence.15,27 Denial and fear of their HIV infection are common in adolescents, especially youth who have been recently diagnosed; this may lead to refusal to initiate or continue cART. Distrust of the medical establishment, misinformation about HIV, and lack of knowledge about the availability and effectiveness of ARV treatments can also be barriers to linking adolescents to care, retaining them in care, and maintaining them on successful cART. 

Perinatally infected youth are familiar with the challenges of taking complex drug regimens and with the routine of chronic medical care; nevertheless, they often have long histories of inadequate adherence. Regimen fatigue also has been identified as a barrier to adherence in adolescents.28 HIV-infected adolescents often have low self-esteem, unstructured and chaotic lifestyles, concomitant mental illnesses, and cope poorly with their illness. Depression, alcohol or substance abuse, poor school attendance, psychiatric disorders and advanced HIV disease have been associated with nonadherence.25,29-31 A review of published papers on adherence among HIV-infected youth suggests that depression and anxiety are consistently associated with poorer adherence.29 Adherence to complex regimens is particularly challenging at a time of life when adolescents do not want to be different from their peers. Further difficulties include adolescents who live with parents or partners to whom they have not yet disclosed their HIV status and youth who are homeless and have no place to store medicine. When recommending treatment regimens for adolescents, clinicians must balance the goal of prescribing a maximally potent ARV regimen with a realistic assessment of existing and potential support systems to facilitate adherence.

Adherence Assessment and Monitoring

The process of adherence preparation and assessment should begin before therapy is initiated or changed. A routine adherence assessment should be incorporated into every clinic visit. A comprehensive assessment should be instituted for all children in whom cART initiation or change is considered. Evaluations should include nursing, social, and behavioral assessments of factors that may influence adherence by children and their families and can be used to identify individual needs for intervention. Specific, open-ended questions should be used to elicit information about past experience as well as concerns and expectations about treatment. When assessing readiness and preparing to begin treatment, it is important to obtain a patient’s explicit agreement with the treatment plan, including strategies to support adherence. It is also important to alert patients to minor side effects of ARVs, such as nausea, headaches, and abdominal discomfort that may recede over time or respond to change in diet or timing of medication administration.

Adherence is difficult to assess accurately; different methods of assessment have yielded different results (and each approach has limitations).14,32,33 Patients, caregivers, and health care providers often overestimate adherence. Use of multiple methods to assess adherence is recommended.33,34 Viral load response to a new regimen is often the most accurate indication of adherence. Other measures include quantitative self report of missed doses by caregivers and children or adolescents (i.e., focusing on missed doses during a recent 3-day or 1-week period), descriptions of the medication regimens, and reports of barriers to administration of medications. Caregivers may report number of doses taken more accurately than doses missed.35 Targeted questions about stress, pill burden, and daily routine are recommended.36,37 Pharmacy refill checks and pill counts can identify adherence problems not evident from self-reports.38 Electronic monitoring devices (e.g., Medication Event Monitoring System [MEMS] caps) which are equipped with a computer chip that records each opening of a medication bottle are primarily used in research studies, but have been shown to be useful tools to measure adherence in some settings.39-41 Mobile phone technologies (.e.g., interactive voice response, SMS text messaging), are being evaluated to quantify missed doses and provide real-time feedback on adherence to caregivers, but studies in the pediatric population are in the pilot phase.42 Home visits can play an important role in assessing adherence. In some cases, suspected non-adherence is confirmed only when dramatic clinical responses to cART occur during hospitalizations or in other supervised settings. Preliminary studies suggest that monitoring plasma ARV concentrations or therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful measures in situations where non-adherence is suspected.43 Drug concentrations in hair are currently being studied as an alternative method to measure adherence.44,45

Adherence can change over time. An adolescent who was able to strictly adhere to treatment upon initiation of a regimen may not be able to maintain complete adherence over time. A nonjudgmental attitude and trusting relationship foster open communication and facilitate assessment. To obtain information on adherence in older children, it is often helpful to ask both HIV-infected children and their caregivers about missed doses and problems. Their reports may differ significantly; therefore, clinical judgment is required to best interpret adherence information obtained from the multiple sources.46

Strategies to Improve and Support Adherence

Intensive follow-up is required, particularly during the first few months after therapy is initiated. Patients should be seen frequently—as often as weekly during the first month of treatment—to assess adherence and determine the need for strategies to improve and support adherence. Strategies include the development of patient-focused treatment plans to accommodate specific patient needs, integration of medication administration into the daily routines of life (e.g., associating medication administration with daily activities such as brushing teeth), and use of social and community support services. Multifaceted approaches that include regimen-related strategies; educational, behavioral, and supportive strategies focused on children and families; and strategies that focus on health care providers—rather than one specific intervention—may be most effective.24,47,48 Programs designed for administration of directly observed combination therapy to adults, in either the clinic or at home, have demonstrated successful results in both the United States and in international, resource-poor settings.49-51 Modified directly observed therapy (m-DOT), where one dose is administered in a supervised setting and the remaining doses are self-administered, appears to be both feasible and acceptable.47,52 However, a recent meta-analysis of 10 randomized clinical trials evaluating DOT to promote adherence in adults found that it was no more effective than self-administered treatment.53 In another meta-analysis of DOT studies, DOT was found to have a demonstrated effect on virologic, immunologic, and adherence outcomes, but efficacy of the strategy was not supported when the analysis was restricted to randomized controlled trials.54 Table 10 summarizes some of the strategies that can be used to support and improve adherence to ARV medications.

Regimen-Related Strategies

ARV regimens often require the administration of large numbers of pills or unpalatable liquids, each with potential side effects and drug interactions, in multiple daily doses. To the extent possible, regimens should be simplified with respect to the number of pills or volume of liquid prescribed, as well as frequency of therapy, and chosen to minimize drug interactions and side effects.55 When non-adherence occurs, addressing medication-related issues (.e.g., side effects), may result in improvement. If a regimen is overly complex, it can be simplified. For example, when the burden of pills is great, one or more drugs can be changed to a fixed-drug combination resulting in a regimen with fewer pills. When feasible, a once-daily regimen should be recommended. Several studies in adults have demonstrated better adherence with once-daily versus twice-daily ARV regimens.56-60 When nonadherence is related to poor palatability of a liquid formulation or crushed pills and simultaneous administration of food is not contraindicated, the offending taste can sometimes be masked with a small amount of flavoring syrup or food (see Appendix A: Pediatric Antiretroviral Drug Information) or a child can be taught to swallow pills in order to overcome medication aversion.61 Unfortunately, the taste of lopinavir/ritonavir cannot be masked with flavoring syrup. 

Patient/Family-Related Strategies

The primary approach taken by the clinical team to promote medication adherence in children is patient and caregiver education. Educating families about adherence should begin before ARV medications are initiated or changed and should include a discussion of the goals of therapy, the reasons for making adherence a priority, and the specific plans for supporting and maintaining a child’s medication adherence. Caregiver adherence education strategies should include the provision of both information and adherence tools, such as written and visual materials; a daily schedule illustrating times and doses of medications; and demonstration of the use of syringes, medication cups, and pillboxes. 

A number of behavioral tools can be used to integrate taking medications into an HIV-infected child’s daily routine. The use of behavior modification techniques, especially the application of positive reinforcements and the use of small incentives for taking medications, can be effective tools to promote adherence.62,63 Training children to swallow pills has been associated with improved adherence at 6 months post-training in a small study of children aged 4 to 21 years.64 Availability of mental health services and the treatment of mental health disorders may facilitate adherence to complex ARV regimens. A gastrostomy tube should be considered for nonadherent children who are at risk of disease progression and who have severe and persistent aversion to taking medications.65 If adequate resources are available, home-nursing interventions also may be beneficial.66 Directly observed dosing of ARV medications has been implemented in adults, adolescents, and children, using home nursing services as well as daily medication administration in the clinic setting. 

Other strategies to support adherence that have been employed in the clinical setting include setting patients’ cell phone alarms to go off at medication times; using beepers or pagers as an alarm; sending SMS text-message reminders; conducting motivational interviews; providing pill boxes and other adherence support tools, particularly for patients with complex regimens; and delivering medications to the home. Two randomized clinical trials in adults have demonstrated that SMS text-messaging, at weekly intervals, is associated with improved adherence outcomes.67-69 In a pilot study evaluating peer support and pager messaging in an adult population, peer support was associated with greater self-reported adherence post-intervention; however, the effect was not sustained at follow-up. Although pager messaging was not associated with reported adherence, improved biologic outcomes were measured.70 A study evaluating the efficacy of a 4-session, individual, clinic-based motivational interviewing intervention targeting multiple risk behaviors in HIV-infected youth demonstrated an association with lower viral load at 6 months in youth taking cART. However, reduction in viral load was not maintained at 9 months.71 

Health Care Provider-Related Strategies

Providers have the ability to improve adherence through their relationships with patients’ families. This process begins early in a provider’s relationship with a family, when the clinician obtains explicit agreement about the medication and treatment plan and any further strategies to support adherence. Fostering a trusting relationship and engaging in open communication are particularly important.72,73 Provider characteristics that have been associated with improved patient adherence in adults include consistency, giving information, asking questions, technical expertise, and commitment to follow-up. Creating an environment in the health care setting that is child-centered and includes caregivers in adherence support also has been shown to improve treatment outcomes.74 

Click here to view this table as an image

Table 10. Strategies to Improve Adherence to Antiretroviral Medications
Initial Intervention Strategies 
  • Establish trust and identify mutually acceptable goals for care.
  • Obtain explicit agreement on need for treatment and adherence.
  • Identify depression, low self-esteem, substance abuse, or other mental health issues for the child/adolescent and/or caregiver that may decrease adherence. Treat mental health issues before starting antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, if possible.
  • Identify family, friends, health team members, or others who can support adherence.
  • Educate patient and family about the critical role of adherence in therapy outcome.
  • Specify the adherence target: ≥95% of prescribed doses.
  • Educate patient and family about the relationship between partial adherence and resistance.
  • Educate patient and family about resistance and constraint of later choices of ARV drug (i.e., explain that although a failure of adherence may be temporary, the effects on treatment choice may be permanent).
  • Develop a treatment plan that the patient and family understand and to which they feel committed.
  • Establish readiness to take medication through practice sessions or other means.
  • Consider a brief period of hospitalization at start of therapy in selected circumstances for patient education and to assess tolerability of medications chosen.
 Medication Strategies
  • Choose the simplest regimen possible, reducing dosing frequency and number of pills.
  • Choose a regimen with dosing requirements that best conform to the daily and weekly routines and variations in patient and family activities.
  • Choose the most palatable medicine possible (pharmacists may be able to add syrups or flavoring agents to increase palatability).
  • Choose drugs with the fewest side effects; provide anticipatory guidance for management of side effects.
  • Simplify food requirements for medication administration.
  • Prescribe drugs carefully to avoid adverse drug-drug interactions.
  • Assess pill-swallowing capacity and offer pill-swallowing training.
 Follow-up Intervention Strategies
  • Monitor adherence at each visit and in between visits by telephone or letter, as needed.
  • Provide ongoing support, encouragement, and understanding of the difficulties associated with demands to attain 95% adherence with medication doses.
  • Use patient education aids including pictures, calendars, and stickers.
  • Encourage use of pill boxes, reminders, alarms, pagers, and timers.
  • Provide follow-up clinic visits, telephone calls, and SMS text messages to support and assess adherence.
  • Provide access to support groups, peer groups, or one-on-one counseling for caregivers and patients, especially for those with known depression or drug use issues that are known to decrease adherence.
  • Provide pharmacist-based adherence support, such as medication education and counseling, blister packs, refill reminders, automatic refills, and home delivery of medications.
  • Consider directly observed therapy at home, in the clinic, or in selected circumstances, during a brief inpatient hospitalization.
  • Consider gastrostomy tube use in selected circumstances.

References

  1. Flynn PM, Rudy BJ, Douglas SD, et al. Virologic and immunologic outcomes after 24 weeks in HIV type 1-infected adolescents receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. Jul 15 2004;190(2):271-279. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15216461.
  2. Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med. Jul 4 2000;133(1):21-30. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10877736.
  3. Van Dyke RB, Lee S, Johnson GM, et al. Reported adherence as a determinant of response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in children who have human immunodeficiency virus infection. Pediatrics. Apr 2002;109(4):e61. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11927734.
  4. Watson DC, Farley JJ. Efficacy of and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Aug 1999;18(8):682-689. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10462336.
  5. Chadwick EG, Rodman JH, Britto P, et al. Ritonavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected infants younger than 24 months of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Sep 2005;24(9):793-800. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16148846.
  6. Bangsberg DR, Kroetz DL, Deeks SG. Adherence-resistance relationships to combination HIV antiretroviral therapy. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. May 2007;4(2):65-72. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17547827.
  7. Nelson M, Girard PM, Demasi R, et al. Suboptimal adherence to darunavir/ritonavir has minimal effect on efficacy compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-infected patients: 96 week ARTEMIS data. J Antimicrob Chemother. Jul 2010;65(7):1505-1509. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20498120.
  8. Lima VD, Bangsberg DR, Harrigan PR, et al. Risk of viral failure declines with duration of suppression on highly active antiretroviral therapy irrespective of adherence level. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Dec 2010;55(4):460-465. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838225.
  9. Parienti JJ, Ragland K, Lucht F, et al. Average adherence to boosted protease inhibitor therapy, rather than the pattern of missed doses, as a predictor of HIV RNA replication. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 15 2010;50(8):1192-1197. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20210643.
  10. Kobin AB, Sheth NU. Levels of adherence required for virologic suppression among newer antiretroviral medications. Ann Pharmacother. Mar 2011;45(3):372-379. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21386024.
  11. Gardner EM, Burman WJ, Steiner JF, Anderson PL, Bangsberg DR. Antiretroviral medication adherence and the development of class-specific antiretroviral resistance. AIDS. Jun 1 2009;23(9):1035-1046. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19381075.
  12. Mellins CA, Brackis-Cott E, Dolezal C, Abrams EJ. The role of psychosocial and family factors in adherence to antiretroviral treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Nov 2004;23(11):1035-1041. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15545859.
  13. Ding H, Wilson CM, Modjarrad K, McGwin G, Jr., Tang J, Vermund SH. Predictors of suboptimal virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy among human immunodeficiency virus-infected adolescents: analyses of the reaching for excellence in adolescent care and health (REACH) project. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Dec 2009;163(12):1100-1105. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19996046.
  14. Khan M, Song X, Williams K, Bright K, Sill A, Rakhmanina N. Evaluating adherence to medication in children and adolescents with HIV. Arch Dis Child. Dec 2009;94(12):970-973. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19723637.
  15. Murphy DA, Sarr M, Durako SJ, et al. Barriers to HAART adherence among human immunodeficiency virus-infected adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Mar 2003;157(3):249-255. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12622674.
  16. Williams PL, Storm D, Montepiedra G, et al. Predictors of adherence to antiretroviral medications in children and adolescents with HIV infection. Pediatrics. Dec 2006;118(6):e1745-1757. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17101712.
  17. Haberer J, Mellins C. Pediatric adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. Nov 2009;6(4):194-200. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19849962.
  18. Marón G, Herr M, Gaur A, Bitar W, Flynn P. Adherence rates in adolescents prescribed once daily and twice daily doses of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Paper presented at: St. Jude/PIDS Research Conference; 2008; Memphis, TN.
  19. Malee K, Williams P, Montepiedra G, et al. Medication adherence in children and adolescents with HIV infection: associations with behavioral impairment. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Mar 2011;25(3):191-200. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21323533.
  20. Giannattasio A, Albano F, Giacomet V, Guarino A. The changing pattern of adherence to antiretroviral therapy assessed at two time points, 12 months apart, in a cohort of HIV-infected children. Expert Opin Pharmacother. Dec 2009;10(17):2773-2778. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19929700.
  21. Gibb DM, Goodall RL, Giacomet V, et al. Adherence to prescribed antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children in the PENTA 5 trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Jan 2003;22(1):56-62. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12544410.
  22. Marhefka SL, Koenig LJ, Allison S, et al. Family experiences with pediatric antiretroviral therapy: responsibilities, barriers, and strategies for remembering medications. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Aug 2008;22(8):637-647. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18627275.
  23. Skovdal M, Campbell C, Madanhire C, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S. Challenges faced by elderly guardians in sustaining the adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children in Zimbabwe. AIDS Care. Aug 2011;23(8):957-964. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21400306.
  24. Naar-King S, Montepiedra G, Nichols S, et al. Allocation of family responsibility for illness management in pediatric HIV. J Pediatr Psychol. Mar 2009;34(2):187-194. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18586756.
  25. Murphy DA, Belzer M, Durako SJ, et al. Longitudinal antiretroviral adherence among adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Aug 2005;159(8):764-770. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16061785.
  26. Rudy BJ, Murphy DA, Harris DR, Muenz L, Ellen J, Adolescent Trials Network for HIVAI. Patient-related risks for nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected youth in the United States: a study of prevalence and interactions. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Mar 2009;23(3):185-194. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19866536.
  27. Garvie PA, Wilkins ML, Young JC. Medication adherence in adolescents with behaviorally-acquired HIV: evidence for using a multimethod assessment protocol. J Adolesc Health. Nov 2010;47(5):504-511. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20970086.
  28. Merzel C, Vandevanter N, Irvine M. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy among older children and adolescents with HIV: a qualitative study of psychosocial contexts. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Dec 2008;22(12):977-987. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19072104.
  29. Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ, Skeer M, Perkovich B, Johnson CV, Safren SA. A review of HIV antiretroviral adherence and intervention studies among HIV-infected youth. Top HIV Med. Feb-Mar 2009;17(1):14-25. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19270345.
  30. Walkup J, Akincigil A, Bilder S, Rosato NS, Crystal S. Psychiatric diagnosis and antiretroviral adherence among adolescent Medicaid beneficiaries diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis. May 2009;197(5):354-361. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19440109.
  31. Rudy BJ, Murphy DA, Harris DR, Muenz L, Ellen J, Adolescent Trials Network for HIVAI. Prevalence and interactions of patient-related risks for nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy among perinatally infected youth in the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Feb 2010;24(2):97-104. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20059354.
  32. Farley JJ, Montepiedra G, Storm D, et al. Assessment of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in perinatally HIV-infected children and youth using self-report measures and pill count. J Dev Behav Pediatr. Oct 2008;29(5):377-384. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18714204.
  33. Burack G, Gaur S, Marone R, Petrova A. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in pediatric patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). J Pediatr Nurs. Dec 2010;25(6):500-504. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21035017.
  34. Muller AD, Jaspan HB, Myer L, et al. Standard measures are inadequate to monitor pediatric adherence in a resource-limited setting. AIDS Behav. Feb 2011;15(2):422-431. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20953692.
  35. Allison SM, Koenig LJ, Marhefka SL, et al. Assessing medication adherence of perinatally HIV-infected children using caregiver interviews. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. Nov-Dec 2010;21(6):478-488. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20452242.
  36. French T, Weiss L, Waters M, Tesoriero J, Finkelstein R, Agins B. Correlation of a brief perceived stress measure with nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy over time. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Apr 15 2005;38(5):590-597. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15793371.
  37. Wiener L, Riekert K, Ryder C, Wood LV. Assessing medication adherence in adolescents with HIV when electronic monitoring is not feasible. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Sep 2004;18(9):527-538. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15630773.
  38. McMahon JH, Jordan MR, Kelley K, et al. Pharmacy adherence measures to assess adherence to antiretroviral therapy: review of the literature and implications for treatment monitoring. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 15 2011;52(4):493-506. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245156.
  39. Bova CA, Fennie KP, Knafl GJ, Dieckhaus KD, Watrous E, Williams AB. Use of electronic monitoring devices to measure antiretroviral adherence: practical considerations. AIDS Behav. Mar 2005;9(1):103-110. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15812617.
  40. Farley J, Hines S, Musk A, Ferrus S, Tepper V. Assessment of adherence to antiviral therapy in HIV-infected children using the Medication Event Monitoring System, pharmacy refill, provider assessment, caregiver self-report, and appointment keeping. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Jun 1 2003;33(2):211-218. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12794557.
  41. Muller AD, Bode S, Myer L, Roux P, von Steinbuchel N. Electronic measurement of adherence to pediatric antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Mar 2008;27(3):257-262. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18277933.
  42. Haberer JE, Kahane J, Kigozi I, et al. Real-time adherence monitoring for HIV antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Behav. Dec 2010;14(6):1340-1346. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20809380.
  43. van Rossum AM, Bergshoeff AS, Fraaij PL, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of indinavir and nelfinavir to assess adherence to therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Aug 2002;21(8):743-747. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12192162.
  44. Gandhi M, Ameli N, Bacchetti P, et al. Atazanavir concentration in hair is the strongest predictor of outcomes on antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. May 2011;52(10):1267-1275. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507924.
  45. van Zyl GU, van Mens TE, McIlleron H, et al. Low lopinavir plasma or hair concentrations explain second-line protease inhibitor failures in a resource-limited setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Apr 2011;56(4):333-339. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21239995.
  46. Dolezal C, Mellins C, Brackis-Cott E, Abrams EJ. The reliability of reports of medical adherence from children with HIV and their adult caregivers. J Pediatr Psychol. Jul-Aug 2003;28(5):355-361. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12808012.
  47. Simoni JM, Amico KR, Pearson CR, Malow R. Strategies for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a review of the literature. Curr Infect Dis Rep. Nov 2008;10(6):515-521. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18945394.
  48. Barnighausen T, Chaiyachati K, Chimbindi N, Peoples A, Haberer J, Newell ML. Interventions to increase antiretroviral adherence in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of evaluation studies. Lancet Infect Dis. Dec 2011;11(12):942-951. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22030332.
  49. Williams AB, Fennie KP, Bova CA, Burgess JD, Danvers KA, Dieckhaus KD. Home visits to improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Jul 2006;42(3):314-321. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16770291.
  50. Myung P, Pugatch D, Brady MF, et al. Directly observed highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected children in Cambodia. Am J Public Health. Jun 2007;97(6):974-977. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17463375.
  51. Bain-Brickley D, Butler LM, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW. Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in children with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12(12):CD009513. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22161452.
  52. Gaur AH, Belzer M, Britto P, et al. Directly observed therapy (DOT) for nonadherent HIV-infected youth: lessons learned, challenges ahead. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. Sep 2010;26(9):947-953. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20707731.
  53. Ford N, Nachega JB, Engel ME, Mills EJ. Directly observed antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet. Dec 19 2009;374(9707):2064-2071. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19954833.
  54. Hart JE, Jeon CY, Ivers LC, et al. Effect of directly observed therapy for highly active antiretroviral therapy on virologic, immunologic, and adherence outcomes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Jun 2010;54(2):167-179. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20375848.
  55. Pham PA. Antiretroviral adherence and pharmacokinetics: review of their roles in sustained virologic suppression. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Oct 2009;23(10):803-807. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19795999.
  56. Boyle BA, Jayaweera D, Witt MD, Grimm K, Maa JF, Seekins DW. Randomization to once-daily stavudine extended release/lamivudine/efavirenz versus a more frequent regimen improves adherence while maintaining viral suppression. HIV Clin Trials. May-Jun 2008;9(3):164-176. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547903.
  57. Molina JM, Podsadecki TJ, Johnson MA, et al. A lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimen results in better compliance and is non-inferior to a twice-daily regimen through 96 weeks. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. Dec 2007;23(12):1505-1514. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18160008.
  58. Parienti JJ, Bangsberg DR, Verdon R, Gardner EM. Better adherence with once-daily antiretroviral regimens: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 15 2009;48(4):484-488. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19140758.
  59. Campo RE, Cohen C, Grimm K, Shangguan T, Maa J, Seekins D. Switch from protease inhibitor- to efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy improves quality of life, treatment satisfaction and adherence with low rates of virological failure in virologically suppressed patients. Int J STD AIDS. Mar 2010;21(3):166-171. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20215619.
  60. Buscher A, Hartman C, Kallen MA, Giordano TP. Impact of antiretroviral dosing frequency and pill burden on adherence among newly diagnosed, antiretroviral-naive HIV patients. Int J STD AIDS. May 2012;23(5):351-355. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22648890.
  61. Czyzewski D, Runyan D, Lopez M, et al. Teaching and maintaining pill swallowing in HIV-infected children. The AIDS Reader. 2000;10(2):88-94. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/410255
  62. DiIorio C, Resnicow K, McDonnell M, Soet J, McCarty F, Yeager K. Using motivational interviewing to promote adherence to antiretroviral medications: a pilot study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. Mar-Apr 2003;14(2):52-62. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12698766.
  63. Hammami N, Nostlinger C, Hoeree T, Lefevre P, Jonckheer T, Kolsteren P. Integrating adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy into children's daily lives: a qualitative study. Pediatrics. Nov 2004;114(5):e591-597. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15520091.
  64. Garvie PA, Lensing S, Rai SN. Efficacy of a pill-swallowing training intervention to improve antiretroviral medication adherence in pediatric patients with HIV/AIDS. Pediatrics. Apr 2007;119(4):e893-899. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17353298.
  65. Shingadia D, Viani RM, Yogev R, et al. Gastrostomy tube insertion for improvement of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in pediatric patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatrics. Jun 2000;105(6):E80. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10835093.
  66. Berrien VM, Salazar JC, Reynolds E, McKay K, Group HIVMAI. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected pediatric patients improves with home-based intensive nursing intervention. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Jun 2004;18(6):355-363. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15294086.
  67. Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, et al. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet. Nov 27 2010;376(9755):1838-1845. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21071074.
  68. Horvath T, Azman H, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW. Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD009756. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22419345.
  69. Pop-Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, et al. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS. Mar 27 2011;25(6):825-834. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21252632.
  70. Simoni JM, Huh D, Frick PA, et al. Peer support and pager messaging to promote antiretroviral modifying therapy in Seattle: a randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Dec 1 2009;52(4):465-473. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19911481.
  71. Naar-King S, Parsons JT, Murphy DA, Chen X, Harris DR, Belzer ME. Improving health outcomes for youth living with the human immunodeficiency virus: a multisite randomized trial of a motivational intervention targeting multiple risk behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Dec 2009;163(12):1092-1098. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19996045.
  72. Wang X, Wu Z. Factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV/AIDS patients in rural China. AIDS. Dec 2007;21 Suppl 8:S149-155. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18172384.
  73. Molassiotis A, Morris K, Trueman I. The importance of the patient-clinician relationship in adherence to antiretroviral medication. Int J Nurs Pract. Dec 2007;13(6):370-376. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021166.
  74. Van Winghem J, Telfer B, Reid T, et al. Implementation of a comprehensive program including psycho-social and treatment literacy activities to improve adherence to HIV care and treatment for a pediatric population in Kenya. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:52. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19025581.