(Last updated: April 8, 2015; last reviewed: April 8, 2015)
|Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional
Rating of Evidence: I = Data from randomized controlled trials; II = Data from well-designed nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; III = Expert opinion
Knowledge about the relationship between a drug’s systemic exposure (or concentration) and responses (beneficial and/or adverse) is key in selecting the dose of a drug, in understanding why patients may respond differently to the same drug and dose, and in designing strategies to optimize drug response and tolerability.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy used to guide dosing of certain antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, antineoplastics, and antimicrobial agents by using measured drug concentrations to improve the likelihood of the desired therapeutic and safety outcomes. Drugs suitable for TDM are characterized by a known exposure-response relationship and a therapeutic range of concentrations. The therapeutic range is a range of concentrations established through clinical investigations that are associated with a greater likelihood of achieving the desired therapeutic response and/or reducing the frequency of drug-associated adverse reactions.
Several antiretroviral (ARV) agents meet most of the characteristics of agents suitable for a TDM strategy.1 Specifically, some ARVs have considerable interpatient variability in drug concentrations; other ARVs have known drug concentrations associated with efficacy and/or toxicity; and in the case of other drugs, data from small prospective studies have demonstrated that TDM improved virologic response and/or decreased the incidence of concentration-related drug toxicities.2,3
TDM for ARV agents, however, is not recommended for routine use in the management of HIV-infected adults (BII). This recommendation is based on multiple factors that limit the routine use of TDM in HIV-infected patients. These limiting factors include lack of prospective studies that demonstrate routine use of TDM improves clinical outcomes, uncertain therapeutic thresholds for most ARV agents, great intra- and inter-patient variability in drug concentrations achieved, and a lack of commercial laboratories to perform real time quantitation of ARV concentrations.2-5
Scenarios for Consideration of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Although routine use of TDM is not recommended, in some scenarios, ARV concentration data may be useful in patient management. In these cases, assistance from a clinical pharmacologist or a clinical pharmacist to interpret the concentration data may be advisable. These scenarios include the following:
Resources for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Target Concentrations
Most TDM-proposed target concentrations for ARVs focus on a minimum concentration (Cmin) (i.e., the plasma concentration at the end of a dosing interval before the next ARV dose). A summary of population average ARV Cmin can be found in a review on the role of ARV-related TDM.2 Population average Cmin for newer ARVs can be found in the Food and Drug Administration-approved product labels.
Guidelines for the collection of blood samples and other practical suggestions related to TDM can be found in a position paper by the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group Pharmacology Committee.4
Challenges and Considerations in Using Drug Concentrations to Guide Therapy
There are several challenges and considerations for implementation of TDM in the clinical setting. Use of TDM to monitor ARV concentrations in a patient requires the following:
A final caveat to the use of measured drug concentrations in patient management is a general one—drug concentration information cannot be used alone; it must be integrated with other clinical information, including the patient’s ARV history and adherence before the TDM result. In addition, as knowledge of associations between ARV concentrations and virologic response evolves, clinicians who use a TDM strategy for patient management should evaluate the most up-to-date information regarding the exposure-response relationship of the tested ARV agent.