Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV
The information in the brief version is excerpted directly from the full-text guidelines. The brief version is a compilation of the tables and boxed recommendations.
Limitations to Treatment Safety and Efficacy
Adverse Effects of Antiretroviral Agents
Last Updated: October 25, 2018; Last Reviewed: October 25, 2018
Adverse effects have been reported with all ARV drugs and, in the earlier era of combination ART, adverse effects were among the most common reasons for switching or discontinuing therapy and for medication nonadherence.1 Fortunately, newer ARV regimens are associated with fewer serious and intolerable adverse effects than regimens used in the past. Generally, less than 10% of ART-naive patients enrolled in randomized trials experience treatment-limiting adverse events. However, the long-term complications of ART can be underestimated, because most clinical trials use highly specific inclusion criteria when enrolling participants and the duration of participant follow-up is relatively short. As ART is now recommended for all patients regardless of CD4 cell count, and because therapy must be continued indefinitely, the focus of patient management has evolved from identifying and managing early ARV-related toxicities to individualizing therapy to avoid long-term adverse effects, including diabetes, accelerated vascular disease, kidney dysfunction, and bone loss. To achieve sustained viral suppression over a lifetime, both long-term and short-term ART toxicities must be anticipated and overcome. The clinician must consider potential adverse effects when selecting an ARV regimen, as well as the individual patient’s comorbidities, concomitant medications, and prior history of drug intolerances.
Several factors may predispose individuals to adverse effects of ARV medications, such as:
- Concomitant use of medications with overlapping and additive toxicities.
- Comorbid conditions that increase the risk of or exacerbate adverse effects. For example, underlying liver disease from alcohol use, co-infection with viral hepatitis, and/or liver steatosis2,3 may increase the risk of hepatotoxicity when drugs such as efavirenz (EFV) or protease inhibitors are used; psychiatric disorders may be exacerbated by EFV, rilpivirine, and, infrequently, by integrase strand transfer inhibitors;4,5 and borderline or mild renal dysfunction increases the risk of nephrotoxicity from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
- Drug-drug interactions that may increase toxicities of ARV drugs or concomitant medications.
- Genetic factors that predispose patients to abacavir (ABC) hypersensitivity reaction,6,7 EFV neuropsychiatric toxicity and QTc prolongation,8,9 and atazanavir (ATV)-associated hyperbilirubinemia.10
Information on the adverse effects of ARVs is outlined in several tables in the guidelines. Table 15 provides clinicians with a list of the most common and/or severe ARV-associated adverse events for each drug class. The most common adverse effects of individual ARV agents are summarized in Appendix B, Tables 1–6.
Switching Antiretroviral Drugs Due to Adverse Effects
Some patients experience treatment-limiting toxicities associated with ART. In these cases, ART must be modified. ART-associated adverse events can range from acute and potentially life-threatening to chronic and insidious. Serious life-threatening events (e.g., hypersensitivity reaction due to ABC, symptomatic hepatotoxicity, or severe cutaneous reactions) require the immediate discontinuation of all ARV drugs and re-initiation of an alternative regimen without overlapping toxicity. Toxicities that are not life-threatening (e.g., urolithiasis with ATV or renal tubulopathy with TDF) can usually be managed by substituting another ARV agent for the presumed causative agent without interrupting ART. Other chronic, non–life-threatening adverse events (e.g., dyslipidemia) can be addressed either by switching the potentially causative agent for another agent or by managing the adverse event with additional pharmacological or nonpharmacological interventions. Management strategies must be individualized for each patient.
Switching from an effective ARV regimen (or agent) to a new regimen (or agent) must be done carefully and only when the potential benefits of the change outweigh the potential complications of altering treatment. The fundamental principle of regimen switching is to maintain viral suppression. When selecting a new agent or regimen, providers should be aware that resistance mutations are archived in HIV reservoirs, regardless of when the mutations were identified by genotypic resistance testing. Even if resistance mutations are absent from subsequent resistance test results, they may reappear under selective drug pressure. It is critical that providers review the following information before implementing any treatment switch:
- The patient’s medical and complete ARV history, including prior virologic responses to ART;
- All previous resistance test results;
- Viral tropism (if MVC is being considered);
- HLA-B*5701 status (if ABC is being considered);
- The patient’s pregnancy status, ability to use effective contraceptives, and desire for pregnancy (if DTG is being considered for patients of child-bearing potential);
- HBV status, since patients with evidence of chronic HBV infection should not discontinue TDF or TAF unless a regimen contains another agent that is active against HBV;
- Adherence history;
- Prior intolerances to any ARVs; and
- Concomitant medications and supplements, taking into consideration any potential drug interactions with ARVs.
A patient’s willingness to accept new requirements for food or dosing must also be assessed. In some cases, medication costs may also be a factor to consider before switching treatment. Signs and symptoms of comorbidities, adverse effects of concomitant medications, or HIV itself may mimic adverse effects caused by ART. Therefore, clinicians should investigate all potential causes for an adverse event. In the case of a severe adverse event, it may be necessary to discontinue or switch ARVs pending the outcome of such an investigation. For the first few months after an ART switch, the patient should be closely monitored for any new adverse events. The patient’s viral load should also be monitored to assure continued viral suppression.
Table 16 lists several major ART-associated adverse events and the options for appropriate switches between agents in an ARV regimen. The table focuses on the ARVs most commonly used in the United States and lists substitutions that are supported by ARV switch studies, the findings of comparative ARV trials and observational cohort studies, or expert opinion. Switching agents in a successful ARV regimen should be done carefully and only when the potential benefits of the change outweigh the potential complications of altering treatment.
|Adverse Event||ARV Agent(s) or Drug Class||Comments|
|Switch from||Switch to|
|Bone Density Effects||TDFa||TAF or ABCb
NRTI-sparing regimens or regimens using only 3TC or FTC as the NRTI may be considered, if appropriate.
|Declines in BMD have been observed upon initiation of most ART regimens. Switching from TDF to alternative ARV agents has been shown to increase bone density, but the clinical significance of this increase remains uncertain.
TAF is associated with smaller declines in BMD than TDF, and patients show improvement in BMD upon switching to TAF. The long-term impact of TAF on patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis is unknown; close clinical monitoring is recommended in this setting.
|Bone Marrow Suppression||ZDV||TDF, TAF, or ABCb||ZDV has been associated with neutropenia and macrocytic anemia.|
|Cardiac QTc Interval Prolongation||EFV, RPV||A PI- or INSTI-based regimen||High EFV and RPV exposures may cause QT prolongation.
Consider switching from EFV- or RPV-based regimens if patient is taking other medications with known risk of Torsades de Pointes, or in patients at higher risk of Torsades de Pointes.
Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke
|ABC||TDF, TAF, FTC, or 3TC||ABC use has been associated with CV disease and cardiac events in some, but not all, observational studies.
TDF has been associated with lower lipid levels than TAF.
|RTV- or COBI-boosted PI regimens, EFV, EVG/c||RAL, DTG, BIC, or RPV||RAL, DTG, BIC, and RPV have less effect on lipids than RTV- or COBI-boosted PI regimens, EFV, and EVG/c.
Large observation cohorts have found an association between some PIs (DRV, FPV, IDV, LPV/r) and an increased risk of CV events. However, this association has not been seen with ATV. Further study is needed.
|Central Nervous System, Neuropsychiatric Side Effects
Dizziness, suicidal ideation, abnormal dreams, depression
|EFV, RPV||ETR, PI/c, or PI/r
INSTIs may be used, but monitoring is recommended (see Comments column).
|In most patients, EFV-related CNS effects subside within 4 weeks after initiation of the drug. Persistent or intolerable effects should prompt substitution of EFV.
INSTIs are associated with insomnia. Depression and suicidality have been infrequently reported with INSTI use, primarily in patients with pre-existing psychiatric conditions.
Hypertriglyceridemia (with or without elevated LDL level)
|RTV- or COBI-boosted regimens, and EFV||RAL, DTG, BIC, or RPV||Elevated TG and LDL levels are more common with LPV/r and FPV/r than with other RTV-boosted PIs. Improvements in TG and LDL levels have been observed with switch from LPV/r to ATV or ATV/r.c|
|LPV/r||ATV/c, ATV/r, DRV/c, DRV/r, RAL, DTG, BIC, or EVG/c||GI intolerance is common with boosted PIs and is linked to the total dose of RTV. More GI toxicity is seen with LPV/r than with ATV/r or DRV/r. GI effects are often transient and do not warrant substitution unless they are persistent and intolerable.|
|Other RTV- or COBI-boosted regimens||RAL, DTG, BIC, or NNRTIs||In a trial of treatment-naive patients, rates of diarrhea and nausea were similar for EVG/c/TDF/FTC and ATV/r plus TDF/FTC.|
|Hypersensitivity Reaction||ABC||TDF or TAF||Never rechallenge with ABC following a suspected HSR, regardless of the patient’s HLA-B*5701 status.|
|NVP, EFV, ETR, RPV||Non-NNRTI ART||Risk of HSR with NVP is higher for women and those with high CD4 cell counts.|
|DTG, RAL||Non-INSTI ART||Reactions to NVP, ETR, RAL, DTG, and MVC may be accompanied by elevated liver transaminases.|
|MVC||Suitable alternative ART|
|Insulin Resistance||LPV/r, FPV/r||INSTI, NNRTI||Results of switch studies have been inconsistent. Studies in HIV-negative patients suggest a direct causal effect of LPV/r (and IDV) on insulin resistance. However, traditional risk factors may be stronger risk factors for insulin resistance than the use of any PI.|
|Jaundice and Icterus||ATV, ATV/c, ATV/r||DRV/c, DRV/r, INSTI, or NNRTI||Increases in unconjugated bilirubin are common with ATV and generally do not require modification of therapy unless resultant symptoms are distressing to the patient.|
Subcutaneous fat wasting of limbs, face, buttocks
|d4T, ZDV||TDF, TAF, or ABCb||Peripheral lipoatrophy is associated with prior thymidine analog (d4T and ZDV) use. Switching from these ARVs prevents worsening lipoatrophy, but fat recovery is typically slow (may take years) and incomplete.|
|Lipohypertrophy||Accumulation of visceral, truncal, dorsocervical, and breast fat has been observed during ART, particularly during use of older PI-based regimens (e.g., IDV), but whether ART directly causes fat accumulation remains unclear. There is no clinical evidence that switching to another first line regimen will reverse weight or visceral fat gain.|
|Rash||NNRTIs (especially NVP and EFV)||PI- or INSTI-based regimen||Mild rashes that develop after initiation of NNRTIs other than NVP rarely require treatment switch. When serious rash develops due to any NNRTI, switch to another drug class.|
|DRV/c, DRV/r||ATV/c, ATV/r, or another drug class (e.g., INSTI)||Mild rashes following DRV/r use may resolve without modification of therapy. For more severe reactions, change to an alternative boosted PI or an agent from another drug class.|
Including proximal renal tubulopathy and elevated creatinine
|TDFa||ABC,b TAF (for patients with CrCl >30 mL/min), NRTI-sparing regimens, or regimens using only 3TC or FTC as the NRTI may be considered if appropriate||TDF may cause tubulopathy.
Switching from TDF to TAF is associated with improvement in proteinuria and renal biomarkers. The long-term impact of TAF on patients with pre-existing renal disease, including overt proximal tubulopathy, is unknown, and close clinical monitoring is recommended in this setting.
|ATV/c, ATV/r, LPV/r||DTG, BIC, RAL, or NNRTI||COBI, DTG, BIC, and, to a lesser extent, RPV, can increase SCr through inhibition of creatinine secretion. This effect does not affect glomerular filtration. However, assess patient for renal dysfunction if SCr increases by >0.4 mg/dL.|
Nephrolithiasis and cholelithiasis
|ATV, ATV/c, ATV/r||DRV/c, DRV/r, INSTI, or NNRTI||This switch should be made if the clinician believes ATV is the cause of the stones.|
|a In patients with chronic active HBV infection, another agent that is active against HBV should be substituted for TDF.
b ABC should be used only in patients known to be HLA-B*5701 negative.
c TDF reduces ATV levels; therefore, unboosted ATV should not be coadministered with TDF.
Key to Abbreviations: 3TC = lamivudine; ABC = abacavir; ART = antiretroviral therapy; ARV = antiretroviral; ATV = atazanavir; ATV/c = atazanavir/cobicistat; ATV/r = atazanavir/ritonavir; BIC = bictegravir; BMD = bone mineral density; CD4 = CD4 T lymphocyte; CNS = central nervous system; COBI = cobicistat; CrCl = creatine clearance; CV = cardiovascular; d4T = stavudine; DOR = doravirine; DRV = darunavir; DRV/c = darunavir/cobicistat; DRV/r = darunavir/ritonavir; DTG = dolutegravir; EFV = efavirenz; ETR = etravirine; EVG/c = elvitegravir/cobicistat; FPV = fosamprenavir; FPV/r = fosamprenavir/ritonavir; FTC = emtricitabine; GI = gastrointestinal; HBV = hepatitis B virus; HSR = hypersensitivity reaction; IDV = indinavir; INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir; MVC = maraviroc; NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI = nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NVP = nevirapine; PI = protease inhibitor; PI/c = protease inhibitor/cobicistat; PI/r = protease inhibitor/ritonavir; RAL = raltegravir; RPV = rilpivirine; RTV = ritonavir; SCr = serum creatinine; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide; TC = total cholesterol; TDF = tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TG = triglycerides; ZDV = zidovudine
- O'Brien ME, Clark RA, Besch CL, et al. Patterns and correlates of discontinuation of the initial HAART regimen in an urban outpatient cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34(4):407-414. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14615659.
- den Brinker M, Wit FW, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus co-infection and the risk for hepatotoxicity of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2000;14(18):2895-2902. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11153671.
- Saves M, Raffi F, Clevenbergh P, et al. Hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus infection is a risk factor for severe hepatic cytolysis after initiation of a protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. The APROCO Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(12):3451-3455. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11083658.
- Harris M, Larsen G, Montaner JS. Exacerbation of depression associated with starting raltegravir: a report of four cases. AIDS. 2008;22(14):1890-1892. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18753871.
- Kheloufi F, Allemand J, Mokhtari S, Default A. Psychiatric disorders after starting dolutegravir: report of four cases. AIDS. 2015;29(13):1723-1725. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26372287.
- Mallal S, Phillips E, Carosi G, et al. HLA-B*5701 screening for hypersensitivity to abacavir. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(6):568-579. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18256392.
- Saag M, Balu R, Phillips E, et al. High sensitivity of human leukocyte antigen-b*5701 as a marker for immunologically confirmed abacavir hypersensitivity in white and black patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(7):1111-1118. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18444831.
- Gounden V, van Niekerk C, Snyman T, George JA. Presence of the CYP2B6 516G> T polymorphism, increased plasma efavirenz concentrations and early neuropsychiatric side effects in South African HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Ther. 2010;7:32. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20723261.
- Abdelhady AM, Shugg T, Thong N, et al. Efavirenz inhibits the human ether-a-go-go related current (hERG) and induces QT interval prolongation in CYP2B6*6*6 allele carriers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(10):1206-1213. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27333947.
- Rodriguez-Novoa S, Martin-Carbonero L, Barreiro P, et al. Genetic factors influencing atazanavir plasma concentrations and the risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia. AIDS. 2007;21(1):41-46. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17148966.