Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection
The information in the brief version is excerpted directly from the full-text guidelines. The brief version is a compilation of the tables and boxed recommendations.
Non-Nucleoside Analogue Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)
Last Updated: April 14, 2020; Last Reviewed: April 14, 2020
|Etravirine (ETR, Intelence)|
|Tablets: 25 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg|
|Dosing Recommendations||Selected Adverse Events|
|Neonate and Infant Dose:
Adult Dose for Antiretroviral Therapy-Experienced Patients:
- Etravirine (ETR) is associated with multiple drug interactions. A patient’s medication profile should be carefully reviewed for potential drug interactions before ETR is administered.
- ETR should not be administered with tipranavir/ritonavir, fosamprenavir/ritonavir, and unboosted protease inhibitors (PIs).
- ETR should not be administered with other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) (i.e., nevirapine [NVP], efavirenz [EFV], rilpivirine, doravirine).
- Limited data in adults suggest that ETR may reduce the trough concentration of raltegravir (RAL),1 but no dose adjustment is currently recommended when ETR and RAL are used together. ETR significantly reduces plasma concentrations of dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/c), and darunavir/cobicistat.2 DTG should only be used with ETR when these drugs are coadministered with atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), or lopinavir/ritonavir. ETR should not be coadministered with EVG/c.
- More common: Nausea, diarrhea, and mild rash. Rash occurs most commonly during the first 6 weeks of therapy. Rash generally resolves after 1 to 2 weeks on continued therapy. A history of NNRTI-related rash does not appear to increase the risk of developing rash with ETR. However, patients who have a history of severe rash with prior NNRTI use should not receive ETR.
- Less common (more severe): Peripheral neuropathy, severe rash, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), and erythema multiforme have all been reported. Instances of severe rash have included Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and HSRs have included constitutional findings and organ dysfunction, including hepatic failure. Discontinue ETR immediately if signs or symptoms of severe skin reactions or HSRs develop (including severe rash or rash accompanied by fever, general malaise, fatigue, muscle or joint aches, blisters, oral lesions, conjunctivitis, facial edema, hepatitis, and eosinophilia). Clinicians should monitor a patient’s clinical status, including levels of liver transaminases, and initiate appropriate therapy when necessary. Continuing to use ETR after the onset of severe rash may result in a life-threatening reaction. People who have a history of severe rash while using NVP or EFV should not receive ETR.
ETR is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced children and adolescents aged 2 to 18 years.
Efficacy in Clinical Trials
In the PIANO study,3 ART-experienced children aged 6 years to <18 years received ETR with a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted PI as part of an optimized background regimen. At Week 24, 67% of these participants had plasma HIV RNA concentrations <400 copies/mL and 52% had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. At Week 48, 56% of the participants had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL and a mean increase in their CD4 T lymphocyte (CD4) cell counts of 156 cells/mm3 from baseline. At Week 48, 68% of children aged 6 years to <12 years had plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL, while only 48% of adolescents aged 12 years to <18 years achieved a plasma viral load of <50 copies/mL.
In a retrospective study of 23 adolescents and young adults in Spain receiving ETR-based therapy, 78% of participants achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at a median of 48.4 weeks of follow-up.4
In a Phase 1 dose-finding study that involved children aged 6 to 17 years, 17 children were given ETR 4 mg/kg twice daily. The study reported that two pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters—area under the curve for 12 hours post-dose (AUC0-12h) and minimum plasma concentration (Cmin)—were lower than the corresponding parameters observed in adults during previous studies.5 However, a higher dose (ETR 5.2 mg/kg twice daily; maximum 200 mg per dose) yielded acceptable parameters and was chosen for evaluation in the Phase 2 PIANO study. Exposures (mean AUC0-12h) remained lower in older adolescents than in adults and younger children, and exposures were lower in Asian participants than in either white or black participants. In the PIANO study, children and adolescents with ETR concentrations in the lowest quartile (<2,704 ng·h/mL or C0h <145 ng/mL) were less likely to achieve sustained virologic responses (defined as plasma viral loads <50 copies/mL) after 48 weeks of treatment than those with ETR concentrations in the upper three quartiles.6
|Population||Mean ETR AUC0-12h (ng·h/mL)||Mean ETR C0h (ng/mL)|
|Children Aged 6–11 Years
(n = 41)
|Adolescents Aged 12–17 Years
(n = 60)
(n = 575)
|Key: AUC0-12h = area under the curve for 12 hours post-dose; C0h = pre-dose concentration during chronic administration; ETR = etravirine|
IMPAACT P1090 examined the PKs and safety of ETR in treatment-experienced children with HIV aged ≥2 years to <6 years.7 ETR was initially given at a dose of 5.2 mg/kg twice daily to a cohort of six children; however, at this dose the geometric mean ETR AUC0-12h values fell below the target range of 60% of the values seen in adults. Subsequent participants were given twice-daily doses of ETR that were determined by weight band: children weighing 10 kg to <20 kg were given 100 mg per dose and children weighing 20 kg to <25 kg were given 125 mg per dose.
The tablets were swallowed whole or dispersed in liquid. The protocol-specified PK targets for ETR were achieved at these doses; the geometric mean AUC0-12h was 3,504 ng·hr/mL, which was within the target range of 2,713 ng·hr/mL to 6,783 ng·hr/mL (60% to 150% of the AUC0-12h value seen in adults). However, considerable intersubject variability was observed, with five of 14 participants (36%) having AUC0-12h values that were below the tenth percentile for the adult AUC0-12h range (<2,350 ng·hr/mL).The ETR AUC0-12h values were significantly lower in children who received dispersed tablets than in children who swallowed intact tablets: 2,841 ng·hr/mL versus 10,721 ng·hr/mL, respectively (P < 0.0001). In light of the increased risk of virologic failure that was observed during the PIANO study among children with lower drug exposures, the Panel on Antiretroviral Therapy and Medical Management of Children Living with HIV (the Panel) does not generally recommend dispersing the ETR tablet. If ETR is administered in this fashion, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered.
Five children with HIV aged 1 year to <2 years were also enrolled in P1090. The ETR exposure in these children was lower than the ETR exposure reported in adults; the AUC0-12h geometric mean ratio was 0.59 (90% confidence interval, 0.34–1.01). Virologic failure, which was defined as a confirmed viral load ≥400 copies/mL, occurred in three of four evaluable children by Week 24.
ETR is often combined with DRV/r for treatment of adults with HIV who have previously experienced virologic failure. Cressey et al. examined PK data from 36 adolescents and young adults receiving ETR 200 mg twice daily in combination with DRV/r 600 mg/100 mg twice daily. The PK exposures of both agents were similar to those seen in adults, although interindividual variability was high.8 The PKs of ETR and DRV were also studied in adolescents and young adults who received DRV/r 800 mg/100 mg once daily with either ETR 200 mg twice daily or ETR 400 mg once daily.9 DRV concentrations were higher when DRV was coadministered with ETR, particularly when the latter was given in doses of 200 mg twice daily. ETR exposures were lower when ETR was given with DRV/r, particularly when ETR was given twice daily; however, the authors noted that these studies had limited sample sizes. While the combination of ETR and DRV/r was effective in a small cohort of adolescents with HIV10 and in 51% of participants in the PIANO study,3,6 these data suggest a need for additional data on the PK interactions for ETR and other antiretroviral (ARV) agents in pediatric patients. Most notably, data is needed on regimens that do not include RTV-boosted PIs. Until such data become available, the Panel recommends using ETR as part of a regimen that includes a RTV-boosted PI.
P1090 evaluated the antiviral activity of ETR in treatment-experienced pediatric patients with HIV aged ≥2 years to <6 years. At baseline, the mean plasma HIV RNA viral load was approximately 247,000 copies/mL, the median CD4 count was 818 cells/mm3, and the mean CD4 percentage was 26%. At Week 24, ETR administered in combination with other ARV drugs produced a virologic response (defined as HIV RNA <400 copies/mL) in 15 of 16 evaluable participants (94%). The median increase in CD4 count from baseline to Week 24 was 298 cells/mm3, and the median increase in CD4 percentage was 5%.
In the PIANO study, rash and diarrhea were the most common adverse drug reactions that were deemed to be possibly related to the use of ETR. Rash (Grade 2 or higher) occurred in 13% of pediatric subjects and emerged at a median of 10 days, lasting a median of 7 days. Rash was observed more frequently in female patients (13 of 64 patients; 20.3%) than in male patients (two of 37 patients; 5.4%). In P1090, adverse drug reactions that were reported for children aged ≥2 years to <6 years were comparable in frequency, type, and severity to those reported for adults. Ten participants (50%) developed rashes within 4 weeks of beginning the study, but these rashes were not attributed to the use of ETR. In this study, rash occurred in 6% of female patients and 7% of male patients, and no subjects discontinued the study prematurely due to rash. Diarrhea occurred in five of 20 patients (25%).
- Do VT, Higginson RT, Fulco PP. Raltegravir dosage adjustment in HIV-infected patients receiving etravirine. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(21):2049-2054. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22011983.
- Molto J, Curran A, Miranda C, et al. Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/cobicistat and etravirine alone and co-administered in HIV-infected patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29237008.
- Tudor-Williams G, Cahn P, Chokephaibulkit K, et al. Etravirine in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected children and adolescents: 48-week safety, efficacy and resistance analysis of the phase II PIANO study. HIV Med. 2014. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589294.
- Briz V, Palladino C, Navarro M, et al. Etravirine-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected paediatric patients. HIV Med. 2011;12(7):442-446. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21395964.
- Konigs C, Feiterna-Sperling C, Esposito S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and short-term safety and tolerability of etravirine in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children and adolescents. AIDS. 2012;26(4):447-455. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22156961.
- Kakuda TN, Brochot A, Green B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of etravirine in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced children and adolescents in PIANO. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(11):1395-1405. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060341.
- MacBrayne CE, Rutstein R, Yogev R, et al. Etravirine pharmacokinetics in treatment-experienced children ages 1- <6 years. Abstract 465. Presentedt at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. 2018. Boston, Massachusetts. Available at: http://www.croiconference.org/sessions/etravirine-pharmacokinetics-treatment-experienced-children-ages-1.
- Cressey TR, Yogev R, Wiznia A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir with etravirine both twice daily in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adolescents and young adults. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017;6(3):294-296. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103489.
- Larson KB, Cressey TR, Yogev R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir with and without etravirine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children, adolescents, and young adults. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2016;5(2):131-137. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27199469.
- Thuret I, Chaix ML, Tamalet C, et al. Raltegravir, etravirine and r-darunavir combination in adolescents with multidrug-resistant virus. AIDS. 2009;23(17):2364-2366. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19823069.