Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Disease

Last Updated: September 22, 2017; Last Reviewed: September 22, 2017

Epidemiology

Despite being preventable and curable, tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from infectious disease globally, with nearly 10 million people developing TB and 1.5 million people dying from TB in 2014.1 TB is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV worldwide, with 1.2 million new HIV-infected persons reported with TB and 390,000 deaths in 2014.

TB infection occurs when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis organisms. Usually within 2 to 12 weeks after infection, the immune response limits multiplication of tubercle bacilli. However, viable bacilli persist for years, a condition referred to as latent TB infection (LTBI). Persons with LTBI are asymptomatic and are not infectious. TB disease (defined as clinically active disease, often with positive smears and cultures) can develop soon after exposure to M. tuberculosis organisms (primary disease) or after reactivation of latent infection. 

It is estimated that the annual risk of reactivation with TB disease among persons with untreated HIV infection is 3 to 16% per year, which approximates the lifetime risk among HIV-negative persons with LTBI (~5%).2 TB incidence doubles in the first year following HIV infection3 and can occur at any CD4 cell count, though the risk increases with progressive immunodeficiency.3,4

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) results in a prompt and marked decrease in the incidence of TB disease, and this effect has been documented in settings with low case rates, such as the United States,5 and in settings with very high case rates.6,7 However, even with the beneficial effects of ART, the risk of TB disease among persons with HIV infection remains greater than that of the general population.8

Rates of TB in the United States are declining, with 3.0 new cases of TB disease per 100,000 population (a total of 9,412 cases) reported in 2014, a decline of 2.2% from 2013.9 The prevalence of LTBI in the general population of the United States is 4.7%,10 which has remained unchanged since the last survey in 1999–2000. The incidence of HIV-related TB has declined more rapidly than the rate of active TB in the general population,11 in part due to the widespread use of ART. In 2014, there were 506 reported cases of HIV/TB co-infection in the United States (6.3% of individuals with TB who were tested for HIV).12 Like TB disease in the general population of the United States, HIV-related TB is increasingly a disease of persons born outside of the United States.11 Notably, TB disease has not decreased significantly in recent years among foreign-born persons with HIV disease in the United States.11,13

Despite these favorable epidemiological trends, TB remains an important opportunistic illness in the United States. Unlike most opportunistic infections, TB is transmissible, particularly to other persons with HIV infection. Therefore, clinicians providing care for persons with HIV must remain vigilant in efforts to prevent TB, knowledgeable about the clinical presentation of HIV-related TB, and cognizant of the complexities of the co-treatment of HIV and TB.  

Preventing Exposure

In the United States, the most common predisposing factor for TB infection is birth or residence outside of the United States.10 Therefore, patients with HIV infection who travel or work internationally in settings with a high prevalence of TB should be counseled about the risk of TB acquisition and the advisability of getting tested for LTBI upon return. While there are risks for TB exposure in some healthcare and correctional settings in the United States, there is no need for precautions for persons with HIV infection beyond those taken for all persons in those settings.

Preventing Disease – Diagnosis and Treatment of Latent TB Infection

The estimated annual risk for active TB among HIV-infected persons with LTBI is 3 to 12 times the risk in the general population.14,15 Furthermore, development of HIV-related TB increases viral load,16 and the risk of HIV disease progression16 and death,17 compared to CD4-matched HIV-seropositive controls without TB. Risk of progression from LTBI to TB disease in HIV-infected persons is reduced both by antiretroviral treatment and by treatment of LTBI. Treatment of LTBI (as defined by a positive tuberculin skin test [TST]) decreases the risk of TB disease by 62% and the risk of death by 26% among persons with HIV infection.18-20 Isoniazid preventive therapy and ART independently decrease the risk of death and severe HIV-related illness.21 Among persons receiving ART, isoniazid preventive therapy further decreased the risk of TB by 37% when compared to placebo.22 In Brazil, a country with medium TB burden, the protective effect of isoniazid against TB in HIV-infected persons with a positive TST lasted throughout 7 years of follow-up.23 Therefore, prevention of TB disease by screening and appropriate treatment for LTBI are key components of HIV care.

Diagnosis of LTBI

All persons should be tested for LTBI at the time of HIV diagnosis, regardless of their epidemiological risk of TB exposure (AII). Among HIV-infected persons, the benefit of isoniazid preventive therapy has been seen primarily in persons with evidence of LTBI (e.g., a positive TST).24,25 However, in one study in South Africa, a setting with a high TB burden, isoniazid decreased the TB risk among all persons receiving ART regardless of TST or interferon gamma release assay result.22 Persons with negative diagnostic tests for LTBI, advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell count <200 cells/µL), and without indications for initiating empiric LTBI treatment (i.e., no recent exposure to a culture-confirmed TB case) should be re-tested for LTBI once they start ART and attain a CD4 count ≥200 cells/µL to ensure the initial test was a true negative result.26,27 Annual testing for LTBI using TST is recommended for HIV-infected persons who are at high risk for repeated or ongoing exposure to persons with active TB (AIII).

Traditionally, LTBI has been defined by the presence of a positive TST (≥5 mm of induration at 48 to 72 hours in HIV-infected persons) in persons with no clinical or radiographic evidence of TB disease. Despite the extensive experience with the TST among persons with HIV infection, the test has several disadvantages: the requirement for two visits to place and read the test, decreased specificity (false positive results) among persons who received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination, and decreased sensitivity (false negative results) among persons with advanced immunodeficiency.28 These limitations of the TST have led to interest in interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) for detection of LTBI. 

Current evidence suggests that, compared to the TST, IGRAs have higher specificity (92%–97% vs. 56%–95%), better correlation with surrogate measures of exposure to M. tuberculosis,29 and less cross-reactivity with BCG vaccination and nontuberculous mycobacteria.30,31 Three IGRAs are FDA-approved and available in the United States. Progressive immunodeficiency is associated with decreased sensitivity of IGRAs, though the effect of immunodeficiency on the sensitivity of IGRAs may be less than its effect on the sensitivity of the TST.32 Like the TST, the reproducibility of positive results of IGRAs is limited.33 Among 46 HIV-infected patients having initial positive tests with the IGRA Quantiferon-TB Gold In-Tube assay, 33 (72%) had negative repeat tests, particularly those with responses at the lower range of the manufacturer’s suggested range of positive results.34

Among persons with HIV infection, the correlation between the TST and IGRAs is poor to moderate.35,36 In prospective studies, positive results with either the TST or IGRA were associated with an increased risk of developing TB disease; in some studies, patients with a positive IGRA were at a higher risk of subsequently developing TB disease than were those with a positive TST.39,40 For all of its limitations, a positive TST result remains strongly predictive of decreased risk of TB progression in response to isoniazid preventive therapy among persons with HIV infection.18 Whether the same is true of the IGRAs remains to be demonstrated.  

In programmatic settings in the United States, TB screening based on the TST has been suboptimal, with only 47% to 65% of patients completing screening.41-43 The use of an IGRA for TB screening may increase the proportion of patients who complete TB screening.

There have been no definitive comparisons of the TST and IGRAs for screening persons with HIV infection in low-burden settings like the United States. Both the TST and the approved IGRAs are appropriate for TB screening among HIV-infected persons in the United States.44 Some experts have suggested using both the TST and an IGRA to screen for LTBI, but the predictive value of this approach is not clear, and its adoption would be more expensive and more difficult to implement. The routine use of both TST and IGRAs to screen for LTBI is not recommended in the United States.44

As tests of immune reactivity against M. tuberculosis, the TST and IGRAs are often positive among persons with TB disease. Therefore, all persons with a positive TST or IGRA should be evaluated for the possibility of active TB disease. Most, but not all, HIV-infected persons with TB disease have symptoms (cough, fever, sweats, weight loss, lymphadenopathy); absence of any of these symptoms has a 97% negative predictive value for culture-positive TB, though this varies depending on pre-test probability.45 The addition of a chest radiograph improved sensitivity of this screening algorithm, but decreased specificity. Obtaining a sputum culture is the gold standard for diagnosing pulmonary TB disease, but this is not cost-effective in screening asymptomatic HIV-infected persons, particularly in the United States where the prevalence of TB is very low. Therefore, symptom screening (asking for cough of any duration) coupled with chest radiography is recommended to exclude TB disease in a patient with a positive screening test.

Treatment of LTBI

Once it is established that there is no evidence of TB disease, HIV-infected persons with a positive screening test should receive prophylaxis (AI). Additionally, HIV-infected close contacts of an infectious case of TB should receive prophylaxis, regardless of screening tests for LTBI. HIV-infected persons who have a negative TST and are not recent contacts of a case of infectious TB may not benefit from treatment of LTBI (AI),24,46-48 though at least one study from a high-burden setting in South Africa showed isoniazid decreased TB risk regardless of TST or IGRA result.22 

Preferred and Alternative Drugs for LTBI Treatment, Including Duration of Therapy 

Isoniazid prophylaxis for 9 months remains the preferred therapy, with proven efficacy, good tolerability, and infrequent severe toxicity (AII). Although peripheral neuropathy, hepatitis, and rash may be caused by either isoniazid or various antiretroviral drugs, the risk of hepatitis – the most important of these adverse effects – is not significantly increased when isoniazid is combined with efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimens (BII).22 Isoniazid prophylaxis should be supplemented with pyridoxine at a dose of 25 to 50 mg/day to prevent peripheral neuropathy (AIII). A significant disadvantage of the 9-month regimen is that the majority of patients do not complete all 9 months of therapy.49 Shorter regimens are more likely to be completed.49-52 Alternative regimens for chemoprophylaxis are shown in Table 1. Rifapentine plus isoniazid given by directly observed therapy (DOT) once weekly for 12 weeks is as effective and well-tolerated as 6 to 9 months of daily LTBI treatment with isoniazid, including in persons with HIV infection whose CD4 lymphocyte counts are generally >350 cells/mm3 and who are not yet on ART.53-55 Although individuals taking ART were not included in the Phase 3 trial of once-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of efavirenz with daily rifapentine is favorable.56 In a PK study of 12 HIV-infected adults without TB receiving once-weekly 900 mg rifapentine with efavirenz, there was minimal effect on efavirenz exposure.57 Raltegravir concentrations were modestly increased, not decreased, when it was given with once-weekly rifapentine.58 Thus, despite the lack of clinical trial outcome data, once-weekly rifapentine/isoniazid can be used with efavirenz or raltegravir without dose adjustment based on available PK data. Increased clinical monitoring is not recommended, but should be based on clinical judgment. When using rifampin-containing regimens, either dose adjustment or substitution of key ART drugs may be needed. The regimen of two months rifampin plus pyrazinamide is not recommended due to the risk of severe and sometimes fatal hepatotoxicity (AII).

LTBI treatment and ART act independently to decrease the risk of TB disease.19,22,59,60 Therefore, use of both interventions is recommended for those persons with LTBI and an indication for ART (AI).

Monitoring of Response to Treatment of LTBI

Individuals receiving self-administered daily chemoprophylaxis should be seen by the prescribing clinician on a monthly basis to assess adherence and evaluate for possible drug toxicity; generally, a clinician should not prescribe more than one month’s supply of a drugs. Although HIV-infected persons may not have a higher risk of hepatitis from isoniazid prophylaxis than HIV-uninfected persons, it is recommended that baseline serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin be measured and repeated if abnormal at baseline.14 Persons with concomitant chronic viral hepatitis have an increased risk of isoniazid-related hepatotoxicity, and such patients should be monitored closely when treated for LTBI.61 With isoniazid, liver enzymes typically increase in the first 3 months but then, through the process of hepatic adaptation, liver enzymes return to normal despite continued therapy. If the serum aminotransferase level increases greater than five times the upper limit of normal without symptoms or greater than three times the upper limit of normal with symptoms (or greater than two times the upper limit of normal among patients with baseline abnormal transaminases), chemoprophylaxis should be stopped. Factors that increase the risk of clinical hepatitis include daily alcohol consumption, underlying liver disease, and concurrent treatment with other hepatotoxic drugs. Patients should be reminded at each visit about potential adverse effects (unexplained anorexia, nausea, vomiting, dark urine, icterus, rash, persistent paresthesia of the hands and feet, persistent fatigue, weakness or fever lasting 3 or more days, abdominal tenderness, easy bruising or bleeding, and arthralgia) and told to immediately stop isoniazid and return to the clinic for an assessment should any of these occur. 

The ultimate decision regarding resumption of therapy with the same or a different agent for LTBI treatment should be made after weighing the risk for additional hepatic injury against the benefit of preventing progression to TB disease62 and in consultation with an expert in treating LTBI in persons with HIV infection.

Clinical Manifestations of TB Disease 

The presence of any one of the classic symptoms of TB disease (cough, fever, night sweats, and weight loss) has high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing TB.45 The sensitivity of classic TB symptoms is lower in people on ART.63 Culture-positive TB disease can be subclinical or oligo-symptomatic.64 The duration of symptoms is shorter in HIV-infected patients,65 and in patients who are markedly immune suppressed TB can be a severe systemic disease with high fevers, rapid progression, and sepsis syndrome.66 After initiation of ART, immune reconstitution can unmask subclinical active TB, resulting in pronounced inflammatory reactions at the sites of infection (see section below on “Unmasking TB-IRIS”). 

The presentation of active TB disease is influenced by the degree of immunodeficiency.67,68 In HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts >200 cells/µL, HIV-related TB generally resembles TB among HIV-uninfected persons. The majority of patients have disease limited to the lungs, and common chest radiographic manifestations are upper lobe infiltrates with or without cavitation.69

In patients with CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, the chest radiographic findings of pulmonary TB are markedly different with infiltrates showing no predilection for the upper lobes, and cavitation is uncommon.67,69,70 Normal chest radiographs are not uncommon in patients with respiratory symptoms and positive sputum cultures.71

With increasing degrees of immunodeficiency, extrapulmonary or disseminated TB (e.g., lymphadenitis, genitourinary TB, osteal TB, pleuritis, pericarditis, and meningitis), with or without pulmonary involvement, are more common. Clinical manifestations of extrapulmonary TB are not substantially different from those described in HIV-uninfected persons. TB must be considered in disease processes involving any site in the body,72 but especially those related to central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal symptoms in which early TB treatment is essential to improve outcomes.73-75 

Diagnosis

Initial diagnostic testing is directed at the anatomic site of symptoms or signs (e.g., lungs, lymph nodes, urine, cerebrospinal fluid). The initial evaluation of a patient suspected of having HIV-related TB should always include a chest radiograph, even in the absence of pulmonary symptoms or signs; pulmonary involvement is common at all CD4 counts.64,76 However, chest radiography is an imperfect screen for pulmonary TB, particularly among patients with advanced immunodeficiency who can have TB culture positive sputum despite normal chest radiographs.77,78 Therefore, sputum smear and culture should be considered in symptomatic patients being evaluated for possible TB disease who have a normal chest radiograph as well as in persons with no pulmonary symptoms but evidence of TB disease elsewhere.

Sputum smear-negative TB is common among persons with HIV infection, particularly those with advanced immunodeficiency and non-cavitary disease.79 However, the yield of sputum mycobacterial culture is not affected by HIV or the degree of immunodeficiency. If a sensitive broth culture technique is used, the sensitivity of sputum culture is quite high.80 Smear and culture of three sputum specimens is recommended in that there was a 10% incremental yield for broth culture between the second and third specimens in a recent large study of patients with HIV.81

Extrapulmonary and disseminated TB are more common in persons with HIV infection, particularly with advanced immunosuppression.82,83 Nodal involvement is common in HIV-related TB, and the combined yield of histopathology, smear, and culture from needle aspirates of enlarged lymph nodes is quite high.84 Histopathologic findings also are affected by the degree of immunodeficiency. Persons with relatively intact immune function have typical granulomatous inflammation associated with TB disease. With progressive immunodeficiency, granulomas become poorly formed or can be completely absent.68

Pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, ascites, and cerebrospinal fluid should be sampled if there is clinical evidence of involvement. The yield of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, culture, and nucleic acid amplification (NAA) testing is generally lower from extrapulmonary specimens compared to sputum but nonetheless can be an important diagnostic tool when M. tuberculosis is isolated. The yield of mycobacterial urine and blood cultures depends on the clinical setting; among patients with advanced immunodeficiency, the yield of culture from these two readily-available body fluids can be relatively high68,72 and may allow definitive diagnosis and be a source of an isolate for drug-susceptibility testing.

Nucleic-acid amplification testing: Standard mycobacterial cultures for TB may take weeks to months to grow, but rapid diagnosis is needed in patients with HIV infection given the risk of rapid clinical progression of TB among patients with advanced immunodeficiency. NAA tests provide rapid diagnosis of TB (some assays also provide rapid detection of drug resistance—see below). NAA tests have at least two uses among patients with suspected HIV-related TB. First, these assays are highly predictive of TB among specimens that are AFB smear-positive. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections are relatively common among patients with advanced immunodeficiency, and NAA tests can be used to direct therapy and make decisions about the need for respiratory isolation among patients with a smear-positive specimen. Second, NAA tests are more sensitive than AFB smear, being positive in 50 to 80% of smear-negative, culture-positive specimens85,86 and up to 90% when three NAA tests are performed. Therefore, use of an NAA test is recommended on at least one specimen from all patients with suspected pulmonary TB.87 NAA tests can also be used on extrapulmonary specimens with the caveat that the sensitivity is often lower than in sputum specimens. 

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is an automated NAA test that can detect both M. tuberculosis and mutations associated with rifampin resistance. It has been widely implemented in resource-limited settings with high TB prevalence and as a frontline TB diagnostic test in HIV-infected patients.88 Xpert MTB/RIF was licensed in the United States in 2013 for detection of M. tuberculosis and reporting of rifampin resistance directly from sputum samples89 and as an aid in decisions regarding respiratory isolation in 2015.90 This assay combines simple processing requirements in the laboratory and rapid turnaround (results within 2 hours). In a recent meta-analysis, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 88% (95% confidence interval 83%–92%) and 98% (95% confidence interval 97%–99%), respectively. The assay is somewhat less sensitive among HIV-infected patients (pooled sensitivity of 80%, 95% confidence interval 67%–88%) than among HIV-uninfected patients (pooled sensitivity of 89%, 95% confidence interval 81%–94%);91 however, this may be in part attributed to a higher prevalence of smear negative disease in HIV-infected individuals.92 In some studies, the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF has been related to CD4 cell count, with higher sensitivity among patients with more advanced immunodeficiency.93 

In extrapulmonary specimens, a 2014 meta-analysis reported Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity of up to 95% in smear positive specimens and 69% in smear negative specimens.94 Median sensitivity varied by specimen type, with higher yield from lymph nodes (96%), CSF (85%), and gastric aspirates (78%) and lower yield from pleural fluid (34%) and other non-pleural serous fluids (67%).

Lipoarabinomannan (LAM): LAM is an M. tuberculosis cell wall polysaccharide that can be detected in the urine of TB patients. LAM can be detected using an ELISA or a lateral flow point of care test. The diagnostic utility of LAM is limited by a low sensitivity but has the advantages of being available as a true point of care test that can be performed on urine. LAM has demonstrated the best performance in HIV-infected patients with low CD4 cell counts (<100 cells/mm3) with a sensitivity of 37 to 56% and specificity of up to 95%.95-97 In addition, LAM has higher sensitivity in patients with worse prognoses,98 who are therefore a high priority to identify. Combining LAM with other diagnostic strategies such as Xpert MTB/RIF testing or smear may improve the diagnostic utility.99,100

Immune-based tests: Immunological tests for TB infection, the TST and IGRA, may be helpful in unusual circumstances in which it is difficult to obtain definitive culture evidence for active TB; evidence of prior TB infection increases the likelihood that a clinical illness may be TB disease. However, these tests are not diagnostic of active TB, and a negative TST or IGRA should never be interpreted as ruling out TB disease because TB may cause anergy and these tests may be negative in up to 11 to 30% of patients with active TB.44  

Drug susceptibility testing: Drug-susceptibility testing should be performed on the initial isolates for all patients suspected of having TB, as resistance to isoniazid and/or rifampin is associated with an increased risk of treatment failure, recurrent TB, and amplification of resistance to additional TB medications.101 The presence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR TB; defined as resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampin) or extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR TB; defined as MDR TB with additional resistance to a fluoroquinolone and either kanamycin, amikacin, or capreomycin) is associated with a markedly increased risk of death.102 Thus, early identification of drug resistance, with appropriate adjustment of the treatment regimen based on results, is critical to the successful treatment of TB disease and to curbing transmission of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis

For all patients with TB disease, drug-susceptibility testing to first-line TB drugs (isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide) should be performed, regardless of the source of the specimen. Drug-susceptibility tests (DST) should be repeated if sputum cultures remain positive for M. tuberculosis at or after 4 months of treatment or become positive 1 month or longer after culture conversion to negative. DST for second-line TB medications (fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, capreomycin, ethionamide, and others) should be performed only in reference laboratories with substantial experience in these techniques and should be limited to specimens with resistance to first-line TB medications.

Phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing: Conventional DST is widely used, and has been validated for first-line drugs. The disadvantage of this technique, however, is that the combined turn-around time of conventional broth or agar-based culture followed by DST may be as long as 6 weeks,103 due to the slow growth of M. tuberculosis. During this time, patients with drug-resistant TB may be receiving ineffective, empiric first-line TB therapy, which could allow for ongoing transmission, further clinical deterioration, and death, particularly in HIV-infected individuals.102

NAA testing for drug resistance: Genotypic testing to identify mutations that confer drug resistance allows rapid detection of resistance. The relationship between these mutations and drug resistance has been studied for a number of TB medications.104 Commercial NAA tests such as Xpert MTB/RIF identify resistance mutations associated with rifampin and commercially available line probe assays identify genotypic resistance for rifampin and isoniazid.92,105 Next generation commercial line probe assays such as GenoType MTBDRsl identify genotypic resistance to other TB medications, but results should be confirmed with standard culture-based DST.106 Several assays can be performed on cultured isolates or directly on sputum specimens.

The largest clinical experience with rapid molecular tests for rifampin resistance is with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. In a 2014 meta-analysis, the sensitivity for detection of rifampin resistance was 95% (95% confidence interval 90%–97%) and specificity was 98% (95% confidence interval 97%–99%).91 False-positive results for rifampin resistance with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay can occur, although this appears to be less common with the current version of the assay.107 However, the comparator for most studies – phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing – should not be considered an absolute gold standard.108,109 Some isolates with rifampin resistance by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay have mutations in the rpoB gene, but are susceptible in phenotypic assays. Two recent analyses showed that treatment failure was more common among patients whose isolates had phenotypic susceptibility but mutations in the rpoB gene compared to patients whose isolates had normal rpoB gene sequences.110,111 

In low MDR TB prevalence settings such as the United States, the positive predictive value of any test for rifampin resistance is limited. Therefore, isolates with an initial reading of rifampin resistance with the Xpert MTB/RIF should undergo confirmatory testing (rpoB gene sequencing, phenotypic drug susceptibility testing), and additional specimens should be obtained from such patients. Consultation with an expert in the diagnosis and treatment of MDR TB should be strongly considered. 

Clinicians who suspect drug-resistant TB in an HIV-infected patient should make every effort to expedite their diagnosis. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of TB Elimination, has a Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance (MDDR) service to make rapid molecular testing for first-and second-line TB medications available for persons suspected of having drug-resistant TB (http://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/laboratory/rapidmoleculartesting/moldstreport.pdf).

Drug resistance should be considered in any patient with: 

  • known exposure to a drug-resistant TB case
  • residence in a setting with high rates of primary drug-resistant TB (e.g., a country or area with high rates of drug-resistant TB in new patients
  • persistently positive smear or culture results at or after 4 months of treatment
  • previous TB treatment, particularly if it was not directly observed or was interrupted for any reason 

Treatment of Disease

Preferred and Alternative Drugs for Treatment, Including Duration of Therapy

TB among persons with advanced immunodeficiency can be a rapidly progressive and fatal illness if treatment is delayed. Furthermore, such patients often have smear-negative sputum specimens.80 Therefore, after collection of available specimens for culture and molecular diagnostic tests, empiric treatment for TB is warranted in patients with clinical and radiographic presentation suggestive of HIV-related TB (AIII).

Treatment of suspected TB for HIV-infected individuals is the same as for HIV-uninfected persons, and should include an initial four-drug combination of isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (AI). If rapid DST results indicate resistance to rifampin, with or without resistance to other drugs, an initial MDR TB regimen – including a fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin) and either an aminoglycoside or capreomycin – should be used (BIII) and can be adjusted once complete DST results are available. DOT is recommended for all patients with suspected HIV-related TB (AII). The likelihood of treatment success is further enhanced with comprehensive case management, assistance with housing and other social support, and assistance in establishing or re-engaging with HIV care, if needed (enhanced DOT).

Drug-susceptible TB should be treated with a 2-month intensive phase of the four drugs listed above. Ethambutol can be discontinued when susceptibility to isoniazid and rifampin has been confirmed. Thereafter, isoniazid and a rifamycin are used in the continuation phase of therapy, generally recommended as an additional 4 months of treatment for uncomplicated TB (AI).

Although intermittent dosing (administration less often than daily) of anti-TB treatment facilitates DOT, regimens that included twice- or thrice-weekly dosing during the intensive phase have been associated with an increased risk of treatment failure or relapse with acquired drug resistance to the rifamycin class, particularly in HIV co-infected persons.112-117 Therefore, daily therapy (5–7 days per week) given as DOT is recommended during the intensive treatment phase (AII). Regimens that included once- or twice-weekly dosing during the continuation phase of therapy were also associated with increased risks of treatment failure or relapse with acquired rifamycin resistance.118,119 Therefore, daily (5–7 days per week) dosing is also recommended during the continuation phase of therapy (AII). Although drug-drug interaction studies suggest that thrice-weekly and daily rifampin dosing is associated with similar levels of cytochrome P450 enzyme induction when dosed with raltegravir,120 whether there is a difference between daily and thrice-weekly dosing during the continuation phase of therapy has not been adequately studied in randomized trials. Observational studies and meta-analyses focused primarily on the intensive phase of treatment and thrice-weekly therapy during the continuation phase was not systematically evaluated in the context of the risk of adverse TB outcomes (treatment failure, recurrence, or acquired drug resistance).115 Although earlier recommendations for TB treatment in HIV-uninfected persons indicated that therapy should be based on the number of doses received rather than the duration of therapy, there are no data substantiating the minimum number of doses needed within a specified time interval in HIV-infected individuals. Every effort should be made to assure that patients receive daily therapy as previously described, allowing up to 28 weeks to complete at least 24 weeks (6 months) of treatment to accommodate brief interruptions of therapy for management of adverse drug reactions as described below.  

The optimal duration of TB treatment for patients with HIV infection and drug-susceptible TB disease is not known. In general, the outcomes of 6-month regimens (2 months of isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, followed by 4 months of isoniazid and rifampin) given as DOT to patients with HIV co-infection have been good.1,12 A randomized trial in the United States showed excellent and comparable outcomes of TB therapy among patients assigned to 6 months or 9 months of therapy, but the trial was underpowered.121 Two trials in high-burden settings showed higher risks of recurrent TB among patients treated with 6 months of therapy, compared to those assigned to 9-112 or 12-month regimens.122 However, the applicability of these two trials is uncertain in low-burden settings in which ART is used, such as the United States. 

Three randomized clinical trials have evaluated strategies to reduce the duration of anti-TB treatment from 6 to 4 months in persons with drug-susceptible TB by substituting moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin for either ethambutol or isoniazid in the intensive phase of treatment and adding one of these to a 2-month continuation phase.123-125 A fourth study evaluated the substitution of moxifloxacin for ethambutol and the substitution of rifapentine for rifampin in a 4-month regimen.126 In each of these trials, despite evidence of more rapid sputum culture conversion, overall 2-month culture conversion rates were not significantly different than with the standard 6-month control regimen, and rates of unfavorable outcomes (as defined by treatment failure or relapse after 18 months of follow-up) were higher. The number of HIV-infected participants in these studies was small, but when analyzed by HIV status the results were similar. These findings reinforce the current recommendation to treat drug-susceptible TB in HIV-infected individuals for at least 6 months (BII). Extension of therapy to 9 months is recommended for those with a positive 2-month sputum culture (BII)

Intensified therapy for CNS TB may be beneficial, but there are limited data to support this. A recent randomized trial that compared 9 months of standard therapy that included rifampicin at a dose of 10 mg/kg with an intensified regimen in which levofloxacin was added and rifampicin was given at a higher dose of 15 mg/kg showed similar rates of survival, adverse events, and secondary outcomes in both HIV-uninfected and HIV co-infected individuals with tuberculous meningitis.127 A PK study of 60 participants in Indonesia suggested that rifampicin administered in doses equivalent to 13 mg/kg or higher given intravenously (similar to 26 mg/kg delivered orally) reduced mortality,128 but this finding requires confirmation in a larger trial. Addition of a fluoroquinolone may improve outcomes in patients with isoniazid-monoresistant tuberculous meningitis.127

Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy should be considered in HIV-infected individuals with TB involving the CNS or pericardium (AI).129 Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy increases survival overall for patients with TB and CNS involvement, although studies were underpowered for detecting a statistically significant survival benefit for those with HIV infection.75 Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy reduces the incidence of constrictive pericarditis, although in a randomized trial of adjunctive prednisolone compared with placebo administered for 6 weeks in HIV-uninfected and co-infected individuals with tuberculous pericarditis, prednisolone was not associated with a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of death, cardiac tamponade, or constrictive pericarditis. Those receiving prednisolone also had a higher incidence of some cancers.129 There have been no trials comparing different doses and treatment durations of adjunctive corticosteroids. Dexamethasone was used in trials of adjunctive corticosteroids for CNS disease (0.3–0.4 mg/kg/day for 2–4 weeks, then taper 0.1 mg/kg per week until dose of 0.1 mg/kg, then 4 mg per day and taper by 1 mg/week; total duration of 12 weeks); prednisone or prednisolone was used in trials of pericardial disease (60 mg/day and taper 10 mg per week; total duration of 6 weeks).75,129 

Special Considerations with Regard to Starting ART

Optimal management of HIV-related TB requires that both infections be addressed. Although data are conflicting with regard to whether sequential treatment of TB followed by initiation of ART is acceptable for those with CD4 cell counts >220 to 250 cells/mm3,130,131 recently published results from large, international, randomized trials of immediate versus delayed initiation of ART indicate that substantial personal health benefits accrue at all CD4 cell counts in persons without active TB. When coupled with the preponderance of data from randomized trials in persons with HIV and active TB, these results support the recommendation that ART should not be withheld until completion of TB treatment (AI).21,132,133 Co-treatment of HIV and TB is complex because of the adherence demands of multidrug therapy for two infections, drug-drug interactions between the rifamycins and many antiretroviral drugs, overlapping side effect profiles of anti-TB and antiretroviral drugs, and the development of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), although the rates of IRIS are higher primarily in those with lower CD4 cell counts. Despite these substantial clinical challenges, co-treatment of HIV-related TB improves survival130 (particularly for persons with CD4 cell counts <50 cells/µL), decreases the risk of additional opportunistic illnesses,134 can achieve high rates of viral suppression,135 may improve TB treatment outcomes,136 and, despite higher rates of IRIS at low CD4 cell counts, is not associated with higher rates of other treatment-related adverse events.131

The SAPIT trial randomized 642 South African adults with CD4 cell counts <500 cells/mm3 and AFB smear + TB to start ART at TB treatment initiation, after the intensive phase of TB therapy but before TB treatment completion, or after TB treatment completion.130 The study was stopped early when the mortality of the two integrated treatment arms was 56% lower than the sequential treatment arm, demonstrating that ART should be started before TB completion. Notably, there was a survival benefit across the range of CD4 cell counts among patients enrolled, including within the stratum of baseline CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500/mm3.

The CAMELIA, STRIDE (ACTG A5221), and TB-HAART trials shed further light on the optimal timing of ART during the course of TB treatment. In CAMELIA, 661 adults in Cambodia with confirmed pulmonary TB and a median CD4 cell count of 25 cells/mm3 (IQR, 10, 56) were randomized to receive ART at 2 or 8 weeks after starting TB treatment. The mortality was decreased from 13% in the 2-week arm to 8% in the 8-week arm,137 and viral suppression rates were very high among those who survived (>95%).

The ACTG A5221 STRIDE study randomized 809 patients from North America, South America, Africa, and Asia with confirmed or suspected TB and a median CD4 cell count of 77 cells/mm3 (IQR, 33,146) to immediate ART (within 2 weeks) or early ART (8–12 weeks).138 A new OI or death occurred among 12.9% of patients in the immediate arm and 16.1% in the early arm by week 48 (P = 0.45). In patients with screening CD4 lymphocytes <50 cells/mm3, 15.5% of patients on the immediate arm versus 26.6% on early ART experienced AIDS or death, (P = 0.02). Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) was more common in the immediate ART arm (11%) compared to the early arm (5%), P = 0.002. Viral suppression rates were similar between the arms. 

The TB-HAART trial included 1,538 HIV-infected patients in South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Tanzania who had culture-confirmed pulmonary TB and CD4 cell counts ≥220 cells/mm3 and who had tolerated 2 weeks of TB treatment. Subjects were randomized to early (after 2 weeks of TB treatment initiation) versus delayed (until 6 months after initiation of TB treatment) ART.131 The median CD4 cell count overall was 367 cells/mm3 (IQR 289, 456). The composite primary endpoint of TB treatment failure, recurrence and death within 12 months of starting TB treatment occurred in 8.5% of patients in the early ART group and 9.2% in the delayed group (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.64-1.30; P = 0.9). Mortality, grade 3 and 4 adverse events and IRIS did not differ among the treatment groups. Patients in the early ART group had higher CD4 cell counts at all time points than those in the delayed ART group; no data on viral suppression were available. Unlike SAPIT, STRIDE, and CAMELIA, the TB-HAART study concluded that ART can be delayed until after 6 months of TB treatment for patients with CD4 cell counts >220 cells/mm3.  

The optimal approach for initiation of ART in TB meningitis remains uncertain. A randomized trial conducted in Vietnam compared ART initiation immediately (within 7 days of starting TB treatment) or 2 months after starting TB treatment among 253 patients with HIV-related TB meningitis.139 This study did not show a survival benefit to early ART initiation. On the contrary, early ART was associated with similar mortality and more frequent and severe adverse events (86%) compared to the deferred ART arm (75%). The overall mortality rates in this study were very high (58%), likely at least in part because the majority of participants had advanced AIDS (median baseline CD4 cell count 41 cells/mm3); it is unclear if these findings would generalize to other settings. Nonetheless, caution in the timing of ART initiation with specific monitoring for drug-related toxicities is warranted in patients with TB disease affecting the CNS.

In conclusion, ART is recommended in all HIV-infected persons with TB (AI). For ART-naive patients, ART should be started within 2 weeks after TB treatment initiation when the CD4 cell count is <50 cells/mm3 and, based on the preponderance of data, within 8 weeks of starting anti-TB treatment in those with higher CD4 cell counts (AI). Given the need for the initiation of five to seven new medications in a short time, adherence support should be offered. In patients with TB meningitis and low CD4 cell counts, early ART may pose a risk for severe adverse effects, and an expert should be consulted and careful monitoring provided. Early ART initiation requires close collaboration between HIV and TB care clinics, expertise in management of ART regimen selection, and support and adherence services for clients.  

When TB occurs in patients already on ART, treatment for TB must be started immediately (AIII), and ART should be modified to reduce the risk for drug interactions and maintain virologic suppression. When TB occurs in the setting of virologic failure, ART drug resistance testing should be performed and intensified adherence counseling should be provided. A new ART regimen may be required to achieve virologic suppression and minimize drug interactions with the anti-TB regimen.

Drug-Drug Interactions in the Treatment of HIV-Related TB

The rifamycin class of antibiotics is the key to effective, short-course treatment for drug-sensitive TB. However, the currently available rifamycins (rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine) have clinically significant interactions with a number of antiretroviral drugs (Table 3 [TB Drug Dosing] and the Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents). These drug-drug interactions are complex, but most result from the potent induction by the rifamycin of genes involved in the metabolism and transport of antiretroviral agents.

The preferred co-treatment regimen for HIV-related TB disease is rifampin-based TB therapy with an antiretroviral regimen of efavirenz plus two nucleoside(tide) analogues (AII). Efavirenz-based ART is associated with excellent TB and HIV treatment outcomes and has low rates of serious toxicity.140 Data on the magnitude of the change in efavirenz concentrations when co-administered with rifampin are conflicting. Early studies reported a 26% reduction in efavirenz plasma concentrations,141 but more recent and larger studies in HIV-infected patients with TB (including patients with higher body weight) have not shown a significant effect of rifampin-containing TB treatment on efavirenz plasma concentrations in the majority of patients.142-144 Previous recommendations to increase the dose of efavirenz, especially in patients weighing >60 kg, are thus not supported by good data and have several disadvantages (complexity of dosing, inability to take advantage of the simplicity of the co-formulation of efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine, and the possibility of increased neuropsychiatric side effects). Given the excellent treatment outcomes of co-treatment with standard-dose efavirenz,140,145 the 600 mg daily dose of efavirenz is recommended (BII).

Rifampin has a more significant effect on the concentration of nevirapine. Earlier studies suggested that clinical outcomes were reasonably good among patients on a co-treatment regimen of rifampin-based TB treatment with an antiretroviral regimen of nevirapine plus two nucleoside analogues when nevirapine once-daily lead-in dosing was avoided.140,146-148 However, more recent data and a meta-analysis indicate that co-treatment with nevirapine-based ART is associated with less satisfactory virologic outcomes and increased incidence of drug discontinuation due to adverse events than efavirenz-based ART in patients on TB treatment.149-151 Nevirapine should generally be avoided unless there are no other options (AI). For patients unable to take efavirenz due to intolerance, nevirapine-based ART is a reasonable alternative, but the lead-in dose of nevirapine should be omitted for patients who are established on rifampin.140

Alternatives to efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment for HIV/TB co-infected patients include regimens with integrase inhibitors or protease inhibitors (PIs). One preferred alternative co-treatment regimen is the combination of raltegravir-based antiretroviral treatment, using 400 or 800 mg twice daily, with standard rifampin dosing (BI).152 Another alternative co-treatment regimen is rifabutin-based TB therapy with an antiretroviral regimen including a ritonavir-boosted PI (BIII). While there are no clinical trials specifically comparing rifampin and rifabutin-containing anti-TB regimens among persons with HIV/TB co-infection taking ART, in general, rifabutin is thought to be a reasonable substitute for rifampin for treatment of TB.153,154 Although the dramatic effects of rifampin on serum concentrations of lopinavir may be overcome by doubling the dose of lopinavir/ritonavir,155,156 the safety of this strategy has yet to be firmly established. High rates of hepatotoxicity were reported when adjusted ritonavir-boosted PIs were given with rifampin to healthy volunteers.157-159 In patients with HIV and TB co-infection, double doses of lopinavir/ritonavir are reasonably well tolerated in those on rifampicin-based TB treatment, but the strategy of increasing ritonavir dosing to 400 mg twice daily leads to high rates of hepatotoxicity.156,160,161 Thus, a strategy of first increasing the dose by 50%, then increasing to full double dose is recommended (BIII). Regular monitoring of transaminases is recommended when double dose lopinavir/ritonavir is used (e.g., more frequently initially, then monthly once stable on full dose). 

Use of rifabutin with boosted PI is thus preferred to use of rifampin with double-dose PI in settings where rifabutin is readily available. Rifabutin has little effect on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir162 or atazanavir,163 and its co-administration results in moderate increases in darunavir164 and fosamprenavir concentrations.165 However, all PIs markedly increase serum concentrations of rifabutin (and one of its principal metabolites, desacetyl-rifabutin). Therefore, the dose of rifabutin must be decreased to avoid dose-related toxicity, such as uveitis and neutropenia.166 In studies of HIV-infected people, rifabutin exposures were significantly lower when rifabutin was dosed 150 mg thrice-weekly with lopinavir/ritonavir compared with rifabutin concentrations when given 300 mg daily in the absence of a protease inhibitor, but concentrations of the active desacetyl metabolite were high.167,168 Among individuals co-infected with HIV and TB, there have been case reports of acquired rifamycin resistance with 150 mg thrice-weekly doses of rifabutin in the presence of a boosted PI-based antiretroviral regimen.169,170 A recent study conducted in South Africa in 16 HIV-infected patients on a lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART regimen demonstrated that rifabutin administered in a dose of 150 mg daily in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir was generally safe and associated with rifabutin plasma concentrations similar to those shown to prevent acquired rifamycin resistance (i.e., rifabutin given 300 mg daily in the absence of a boosted PI).168 A randomized clinical trial evaluating rifabutin PK and TB and ART outcomes using this dose with lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART is in progress. Based on available PK data, it is recommended that rifabutin should be dosed 150 mg daily (at least during the first 2 months of TB treatment) in patients who are on a ritonavir-boosted PI-containing antiretroviral regimen (BII). However, given that the risk of adverse events related to high levels of rifabutin’s metabolite with this dosing strategy has not been firmly established, close monitoring for toxicity (especially neutropenia and uveitis) is required until larger studies provide adequate safety data. Close monitoring of adherence to ART is essential as these reduced doses of rifabutin would be inadequate if the patient stopped taking the PI, putting the patient at risk of rifamycin-resistant TB. 

Raltegravir concentrations are significantly decreased when co-administered with rifampin. Increasing the dose of raltegravir to 800 mg twice daily mitigates this PK interaction.171 However, it is unclear whether or not an increase in dose is needed. In a Phase 2 randomized trial in HIV-infected people with TB, virologic responses appeared to be similar in non-comparative analyses of the raltegravir 400 and 800 mg twice daily arms.152 Alternatively, raltegravir can be given with a rifabutin-containing TB regimen without dose adjustment of either drug.172 Dolutegravir may be another reasonable treatment option. A pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers showed that increasing the dose of dolutegravir to 50 mg twice a day with rifampin resulted in similar exposure to dolutegravir dosed 50 mg daily without rifampin, and that rifabutin 300 mg daily did not significantly reduce the area under the concentration curve of dolutegravir.173 Dolutegravir has not yet been studied in a significant number of HIV-infected individuals with TB. Due to the potential for significant drug interactions as detailed above, the following drugs should not be used with rifampin: rilpivirine, etravirine, and elvitegravir co-formulated with cobicistat (AIII). Their use with rifabutin has not been evaluated. Tenofovir alafenamide should not be used with any of the rifamycins.

The breadth and magnitude of drug-drug interactions between the rifamycins and many antiretroviral drugs can be daunting. Nevertheless, every effort should be made to include a rifamycin in the TB treatment regimen; the drug-drug interactions between rifamycins and antiretroviral drugs should be managed, not avoided. Rifamycins remain the most potent drug class for TB treatment, and regimens that included just 2 months of rifampin were associated with increased risks of treatment failure and TB recurrence among patients with HIV-related TB.174,175 If a rifamycin cannot be used, TB treatment duration must be extended substantially, as there is currently no drug substitute with the curative power of rifampin. Thus, patients with rifamycin-susceptible M. tuberculosis isolates should only be treated with a regimen that does not contain a rifamycin when the patient has had a serious adverse event that is highly likely to be due to a rifamycin (AIII).

Monitoring the Response to Therapy

Patients with pulmonary TB should have monthly sputum smears and cultures performed to document culture conversion on therapy (defined as two consecutive negative cultures). Patients with susceptible TB typically convert sputum cultures to negative by 2 months of first-line TB therapy, although patients with advanced disease (i.e., cavitary TB disease) may take longer to convert sputum cultures to negative.176 Patients who have not had sputum culture conversion at or after 4 months of therapy have failed treatment and should have sputum sent for resistance testing. 

Management of Suspected Treatment Failure

The causes of treatment failure include undetected primary drug resistance, inadequate adherence to therapy, incorrect or inadequate regimen prescribed, subtherapeutic drug levels due to malabsorption, super-infection with drug-resistant M. tuberculosis, and acquired drug-resistance. 

Patients with suspected treatment failure should be evaluated with a history, physical exam, and chest radiograph to determine whether the patient has clinically responded to therapy, even though his/her cultures have not converted. The initial culture results and drug-resistance tests, treatment regimen, and adherence should also be reviewed. Samples from all available sites (e.g., sputum, blood, urine, etc.) should be taken for repeat culture and drug-susceptibility testing, and strong consideration should be given to performing rapid resistance testing on direct specimens or positive cultures to identify acquired drug resistance or super-infection with a drug-resistant strain.

While awaiting results of repeat cultures and rapid resistance testing, empiric TB treatment should be broadened using second-line TB drugs, in consultation with an expert in the field (BIII).

Adverse Drug Reactions in TB Patients on ART

HIV-infected patients not on ART are more likely to experience adverse events thought to be drug-related during the course of anti-TB therapy than HIV-uninfected patients.177,178 Many adverse drug reactions are shared between antiretrovirals and anti-TB therapy, including the potentially life-threatening drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). Retrospective observational studies had reported an increased risk of adverse drug reactions in patients treated with concomitant ART and anti-TB therapy,177 but two recent randomized controlled trials of ART commencement during or after anti-TB therapy reported similar rates of adverse events during anti-TB therapy with and without ART.130,131 Therefore, there does not seem to be significant additive toxicity when ART is given together with anti-TB therapy. However, managing suspected adverse drug reactions in this setting is complex, because assigning causality to individual drugs in patients on anti-TB drugs, ART, and cotrimoxazole is very difficult. 

Because alternative drugs are less efficacious and have more toxicities than first-line anti-TB drugs, the first-line drugs (especially isoniazid and rifampin or rifabutin) should not be stopped permanently without strong evidence that the specific anti-TB drug was the cause of the reaction. In such situations, decisions regarding re-challenge with first-line drugs and/or substitution of second-line drugs should be made in consultation with a specialist in treating TB disease in persons with HIV infection.

DILI can be caused by isoniazid, rifamycins, pyrazinamide, many antiretroviral drugs, and cotrimoxazole. Anti-TB DILI is defined as an ALT elevation to ≥3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in the presence of symptoms (e.g., fever, rash, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, jaundice), or ≥5 times the ULN in the absence of symptoms. An increase in ALT concentration occurs in approximately 5 to 30% of patients treated with the standard four-drug anti-TB regimen,62,179 but many of these patients only have transient, mild elevations of ALT.62 If these criteria are fulfilled, all potentially hepatotoxic drugs should be stopped, and the patient should be evaluated immediately. Serologic testing for hepatitis A, B, and C should be performed, and the patient should be questioned regarding symptoms suggestive of biliary tract disease and exposures to alcohol and other hepatotoxins. At least three anti-TB drugs should be started (ethambutol, an aminoglycoside, and moxifloxacin or levofloxacin180) as a “bridging regimen” until the specific cause of hepatotoxicity can be determined and an alternative longer-term regimen constructed (BIII). A re-challenge with the hepatotoxic first-line anti-TB medications can be started by adding them one at a time at intervals of 7 days to the “bridging regimen” after the ALT level returns to <2.5 times the ULN (or to near baseline for patients with pre-existing abnormalities) with frequent monitoring of ALT. Re-challenge was successful in almost 90% of HIV-uninfected patients in one randomized controlled trial of different re-challenge regimens.180 Because the rifamycins are a critical part of the TB regimen, they should be restarted first. Re-challenge with pyrazinamide is controversial, because some studies have reported high rates of recurrent ALT elevations, but this may be considered in severe forms of TB (e.g., meningitis or disseminated TB).181 Depending on the outcome of the re-challenge, the anti-TB therapy regimen and duration may need to be altered—expert consultation is advised. After anti-TB drug re-challenge, if appropriate, relevant antiretroviral drugs and cotrimoxazole may be restarted.

CADRs may occur with all of the first-line anti-TB drugs, notably rifampin and isoniazid,182 many antiretroviral drugs, notably the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and cotrimoxazole. If rash is minor, affects a limited area, and causes pruritus, antihistamines should be administered for symptomatic relief and all anti-TB medications continued. If the rash is generalized, or associated with fever or DILI, or if there is mucous membrane involvement or desquamation, all anti-TB medications, relevant antiretrovirals, and cotrimoxazole should be stopped. When the rash is substantially improved, the TB drug should be restarted as described in the section on DILI above. If the rash recurs, the last drug that had been added should be stopped and the TB regimen modified. Thereafter, if appropriate, relevant antiretroviral drugs and cotrimoxazole may be recommenced.

Management of Drug-Resistant TB

Although drug-resistant TB represents a small fraction of TB cases seen in the United States, the increasing prevalence of drug-resistant TB globally, plus the high proportion of TB cases in the United States in people who are foreign-born, make it increasingly likely that local TB programs will be faced with this complex disease. There is a need for clinical trials to determine the optimal management of patients with drug-resistant TB. The most active and effective TB drugs are those used in first-line TB treatment regimens (isoniazid and rifampin, in particular). When resistance develops to these medications, alternative combinations of first- and second-line TB medications must be used, but their optimal use has not been tested using rigorous clinical trials.

Growing evidence demonstrates that there is an increased risk of treatment failure associated with baseline isoniazid monoresistance,183 particularly in patients with HIV co-infection.112 Substitution of a fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin) for isoniazid is suggested for at least the first 2 months of therapy (BIII) and considered during the continuation phase with rifampin and ethambutol as well (CIII), for a total duration of treatment of 9 months (BII).

Resistance to rifampin alone, or to rifampin and other drugs, substantially increases the complexity and duration of treatment. Treatment of these drug-resistant TB cases requires the use of second-line and often third-line TB medications, which are less effective, more toxic, and require 12 to 24 months of treatment (ATS/CDC/IDSA 2003).184 Treatment outcomes for MDR TB are considerably worse than those for drug-susceptible TB—especially in patients with HIV co-infection.102 Consensus treatment guidelines for MDR TB184 are based on a review of published observational studies185 and recommend use of at least five drugs with known or likely activity against the patient’s isolate (BIII). In general, such regimens will include a later-generation fluoroquinolone, a second-line injectable agent (i.e., kanamycin, amikacin, or capreomycin), ethionamide, pyrazinamide and at least one other second-line drug, such as cycloserine or para-aminosalicylic acid (BIII). Additional resistance to one or more of these drugs (e.g., extensively drug-resistant [XDR] TB), however, may necessitate use of alternate or third-line agents with uncertain anti-TB activity. Whenever possible, treatment should be individualized to the patient’s specific drug-susceptibility testing results or based upon his or her treatment history. An intensive phase of 8 months is then followed by a continuation phase without the injectable agent for an additional 12 to 18 months. Surgery (removal of the TB lesion) should be considered as an adjunctive measure in those with localized disease.186 

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently issued guidance for programs in resource-limited settings on a standardized shorter-course regimen that includes seven anti-TB drugs and a duration of 9 to 12 months of treatment for selected patients with MDR TB.187 The regimen composition is based on combinations evaluated as the Bangladesh regimen,188 and includes kanamycin, moxifloxacin, prothionamide, clofazimine, pyrazinamide, high-dose isoniazid, and ethambutol administered for 4 to 6 months, followed by moxifloxacin, clofazimine, pyrazinamide and ethambutol for 5 months. This approach has not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials among HIV-infected persons on ART or in higher resourced settings with consistent access to DST such as the United States. Based on promising observational data, an additional clinical trial is examining the efficacy of an intensive, shortened, 9-month treatment regimen for MDR TB (NCT02409290) using currently available medications, but at present there are insufficient data to support this approach in HIV-infected individuals.

Current medications for MDR TB carry considerable toxicity, including irreversible hearing loss, hypothyroidism, psychosis, and treatment-limiting gastrointestinal discomfort. Given the prolonged treatment course for MDR TB (20–24 months), patients and family members must be counseled ahead of time about possible side effects and educated regarding the importance of treatment adherence. While on therapy, patients should be monitored closely for the appearance of side effects. Such screening should include serum chemistries, liver function tests, thyroid stimulating hormone, and audiometry. Sputum cultures should be sent monthly, even after culture-conversion, so that any relapse and amplified resistance are detected early.

The treatment of MDR TB is evolving as new drugs for TB treatment are introduced. Bedaquiline, a novel drug in an entirely new class, was recently approved in the United States for treatment of MDR TB. However, late, unexplained higher mortality among the relatively small number of patients who received bedaquiline in randomized trials189 suggests that this drug should be used with caution and only in patients without other MDR TB treatment options while awaiting additional studies.190 Although clinical experience with bedaquiline is still very limited, early studies have revealed several important drug-drug interactions with common antiretroviral agents. Specifically, efavirenz decreases bedaquiline levels and should not be used concurrently.173 Lopinavir/ritonavir, by contrast, increases bedaquiline plasma concentrations approximately 2-fold when given at steady-state, but the clinical significance of this increase is not yet known.191,192

Delamanid, an additional new agent with a mechanism of action distinct from bedaquiline’s, has also shown promise in early phase clinical trials.193 Delamanid has been approved in Europe and Japan but is not yet available in the United States. A Phase 3 trial is currently underway (NCT01424670).  

Given these complexities, treatment of MDR TB should involve an expert with experience in treating drug-resistant TB cases (one option is to contact a CDC Regional Training and Medical Consultation Center at http://www.cdc.gov/tb/education/rtmc/default.htm, if a local expert is not available).

Tuberculosis-Associated Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome

TB-IRIS is a frequent early complication of ART in patients with recently diagnosed or undiagnosed active TB. The condition is thought to result from the recovering immune system driving inflammatory reactions directed at M. tuberculosis antigen present at sites of disease.194-196 TB-IRIS is characterized by excessive local or systemic inflammation. Two forms of TB-IRIS are recognized: paradoxical TB-IRIS and unmasking TB-IRIS. Proposed clinical case definitions for these syndromes have been published.197

Paradoxical TB-IRIS

Paradoxical TB-IRIS occurs in patients who are diagnosed with active TB prior to starting ART. Typically, these patients have had clinical improvement on TB treatment prior to starting ART. Within the first weeks of ART (though sometimes later), they develop new or recurrent symptoms as well as new, worsening, or recurrent clinical and radiologic features of TB. Common and important manifestations of paradoxical TB-IRIS include hectic fevers, new or enlarging lymphadenopathy, and new or worsening pulmonary infiltrates. Mortality due to paradoxical TB-IRIS is uncommon,195,198 but life-threatening manifestations include enlarging cerebral tuberculomas, meningitis, enlargement of pericardial effusions causing cardiac tamponade, extensive pulmonary involvement with respiratory failure, nodal enlargement causing airway obstruction, and splenic rupture due to rapid enlargement.195,199,200 In patients with disseminated TB, hepatic TB-IRIS is common. This manifests with nausea and vomiting, tender hepatic enlargement, cholestatic liver function derangement, and occasionally jaundice.201,202 A liver biopsy reveals a granulomatous hepatitis.203 Hepatic TB-IRIS may be difficult to differentiate from drug-induced liver injury. 

Paradoxical TB-IRIS is relatively common among patients starting ART while on TB treatment (incidence 48%–54%). A recent meta-analysis provided a pooled incidence of 18%, with death attributable to TB-IRIS occurring in 2% of TB-IRIS cases.204 The onset of paradoxical TB-IRIS symptoms is typically between 1 to 4 weeks after ART is initiated.205-210 The syndrome lasts for 2 to 3 months on average,199,211 but some cases may have symptoms for months and rarely local manifestations may persist or recur over a year after onset.197,211,212 Such prolonged TB-IRIS cases usually manifest with suppurative lymphadenitis and abscess formation.

The most consistently identified risk factors for paradoxical TB-IRIS are a low CD4 cell count at start of ART, especially those patients with a CD4 cell count <100 cells/mm3,208,213 high HIV viral load prior to ART,214,215 disseminated or extrapulmonary TB,199,207,209,213 and a short interval between starting TB treatment and ART, particularly if ART is started within the first 1 to 2 months of TB treatment.199,206,208 Even though early ART increases the risk for TB-IRIS, ART should be started within 2 weeks of TB diagnosis in those with CD4 cell counts <50 cells/µL, given that this reduces risk of AIDS progression and death.204

The diagnosis of paradoxical TB-IRIS may be challenging and there is no definitive confirmatory test. Thus, diagnosis relies upon a characteristic clinical presentation: improvement of TB symptoms prior to ART, deterioration with inflammatory features of TB soon after starting ART, demonstration of a response to ART (CD4 rise and/or HIV viral load reduction) and, very importantly, investigations to exclude alternative causes for deterioration, particularly undetected TB drug resistance.202

Management of Paradoxical TB-IRIS

Most cases of paradoxical TB-IRIS are self-limiting. Many patients require symptomatic therapy (analgesia, anti-emetics), and if symptoms are significant, anti-inflammatory therapy should be considered. One randomized, placebo-controlled trial among patients with moderately severe paradoxical TB-IRIS showed that treatment with prednisone (1.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks followed by 0.75 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) resulted in a reduction in a combined endpoint of days hospitalized plus outpatient therapeutic procedures.216 Those on prednisone experienced more rapid symptom and radiographic improvement. No reduction in mortality was demonstrated, but immediately life-threatening cases (e.g., those with neurological involvement) were excluded from this study. The above study,216 observational data,200 and clinical trials of patients treated with corticosteroids at the time of TB meningitis presentation where corticosteroids reduced mortality75 suggest that corticosteroids (either intravenous dexamethasone or oral prednisone) should be used when TB-IRIS involves the CNS (e.g., enlarging tuberculoma, new or recurrent meningeal inflammation). Among all patients developing TB-IRIS, 4 weeks of prednisone treatment was insufficient in a subset, and they may require more gradual tapering of steroids over a few months (BIII).216 Tapering of corticosteroids should be guided by repeated clinical assessment of symptoms (BIII). Corticosteroids should be avoided in patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma, as life-threatening exacerbations can occur,217 and also where the diagnosis of paradoxical TB-IRIS is not certain. There are case reports of patients with steroid-refractory and prolonged IRIS responding to TNF-blockers or thalidomide.218-220

Some clinicians use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to provide symptomatic relief in patients with mild TB-IRIS (CIII). Needle aspiration of enlarging serous effusions, large tuberculous abscesses, or suppurative lymphadenitis may provide symptom relief (CIII). Repeated aspirations may be required as abscesses and effusions often re-accumulate.199

Unmasking TB-IRIS

Unmasking TB-IRIS may occur in patients who have unrecognized TB at the start of ART (because it is oligo-symptomatic or because the diagnosis has been missed). These patients may present with a particularly accelerated and inflammatory presentation of TB in the first weeks of ART.197 A common presentation is pulmonary TB with rapid symptom onset and clinical features similar to bacterial pneumonia with high fever, respiratory distress, sepsis syndrome, and consolidation on chest radiograph.197,216,221-223 Focal inflammatory manifestations such as abscesses and lymphadenitis may also develop.224 The treatment should be standard TB treatment and corticosteroids, if the manifestations are life-threatening, although there is no clinical trial evidence to support steroid use (BIII).

Prevention of Recurrent TB 

The risk of recurrent TB among patients with HIV co-infection appears to be somewhat higher than in HIV-uninfected patients treated with the same TB treatment regimen in the same setting.225 In TB-endemic settings, much of the increased risk of recurrent TB appears to be due to the higher risk of re-infection with a new strain of M. tuberculosis, with subsequent rapid progression to TB disease.226,227 In settings with low rates of TB (such as the United States), recurrent TB due to re-infection is uncommon, even among HIV-infected patients.228

Several interventions have been suggested to decrease the risk of recurrent TB among patients with HIV co-infection: longer TB treatment regimens, more frequent dosing of TB therapy, post-treatment isoniazid therapy, and use of ART. None of these interventions has been adequately evaluated in randomized trials in settings with low TB burdens. Post-treatment isoniazid (6–9 months of daily isoniazid therapy after the completion of standard multidrug therapy) has been shown to be effective in high-burden settings in which the risk of re-exposure is high,229,230 suggesting that this intervention decreases the risk of re-infection. However, post-treatment isoniazid is not recommended in low-burden settings such as the United States. Given its beneficial effects on the risk of initially developing TB disease, it is very likely that ART decreases the risk of re-infection with TB disease.

Special Considerations During Pregnancy

HIV-infected pregnant women who do not have documentation of a prior negative TB screening test result or who are at high risk for repeated or ongoing exposure to individuals with active TB should be tested during pregnancy (AIII). The frequency of anergy is not increased during pregnancy, and routine anergy testing for HIV-infected pregnant women is not recommended.231-234 There are several studies examining the performance of the IGRAs for diagnosis of LTBI in pregnant women. In a study in HIV-infected pregnant women in Kenya, a positive IGRA result was associated with a 4.5-fold increased risk of developing active TB disease; in women with CD4 cell counts <250 cells/μL, a positive IGRA result was associated with a 5-fold increased risk of maternal mortality or active TB and a 3-fold increased risk of either active TB or mortality in infants.235 Antenatal IGRA testing has also been demonstrated to correlate with postpartum IGRA test positivity (i.e., TB infection) in HIV-infected women.236 In women without HIV infection, the test appears to perform well but cost issues for routine screening are an area of debate.237 If LTBI is diagnosed during pregnancy and active TB has been ruled out, preventive treatment should be considered during pregnancy (BIII). The potential risk of isoniazid toxicity must be weighed against the consequences of active TB developing during pregnancy and postpartum. Studies in HIV/TB co-infected individuals who are not receiving ART have found a high risk of progression from LTBI to active TB (10% per year) and there is a high risk of maternal and infant mortality in HIV-infected pregnant women with active TB.238,239 However, the risk of progression from LTBI to active TB in individuals on ART is significantly decreased.240 Given that HIV-infected pregnant women should be receiving ART for prevention of mother-to-child transmission, the risks and benefits of isoniazid therapy should be discussed. The risk of isoniazid-associated hepatotoxicity may be increased in pregnancy and frequent monitoring is needed for women receiving therapy.241 Pregnant women receiving isoniazid should receive daily pyridoxine supplementation as they are at risk of isoniazid-associated peripheral neuropathy.242

The diagnostic evaluation for TB disease in pregnant women is the same as for non-pregnant adults. Chest radiographs with abdominal shielding are recommended and result in minimal fetal radiation exposure. An increase in pregnancy complications and undesirable outcomes including preterm birth, low birthweight, and fetal growth restriction might be observed among pregnant women with either pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB not confined to the lymph nodes, especially when treatment is not begun until late in pregnancy.231-234,243-246 Congenital TB infection of the infant has been reported, although it appears relatively uncommon.247 However, in one study of 107 women with active TB during pregnancy in South Africa, M. tuberculosis was detected in 16% of neonates (12 by culture and 4 by smear microscopy) sampled within the first 3 weeks of life.248

Treatment of TB disease for pregnant women should be the same as for non-pregnant women, but with attention given to the following considerations (BIII)

  • Although isoniazid is not teratogenic in animals or humans, hepatotoxicity caused by isoniazid might occur more frequently in pregnancy and the postpartum period.249 Monthly monitoring of liver transaminases during pregnancy and the postpartum period is recommended (CIII).
  • Rifampin is not teratogenic in humans. 
  • Ethambutol is teratogenic in rodents and rabbits at doses that are much higher than those used in humans. No evidence of teratogenicity has been observed in humans. Ocular toxicity has been reported in adults taking ethambutol, but changes in visual acuity have not been detected in infants born after exposure in utero.
  • Pyrazinamide is not teratogenic in animals. Experience is limited with use in human pregnancy. Although WHO and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases250,251 have made recommendations for the routine use of pyrazinamide in pregnant women, it has not been recommended for general use during pregnancy in the United States because data characterizing its effects in this setting are limited.252 If pyrazinamide is not included in the initial treatment regimen, the minimum duration of TB therapy should be 9 months (CIII). The decision regarding whether to include pyrazinamide for treatment should be made after consultation among obstetricians, TB specialists, and patients, taking into account gestational age and likely susceptibility pattern of the infecting strain.

Considering the information above, the preferred first-line treatment for TB in pregnancy is isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol.253 Experience with using the majority of the second-line drugs for TB during pregnancy is limited.254-257 MDR TB in pregnancy should be managed in consultation with a specialist. Therapy should not be withheld because of pregnancy (AIII). The following concerns should be considered when selecting second-line anti-TB drugs for use in pregnant women: 

  • Streptomycin use has been associated with a 10% rate of vestibulocochlear nerve toxicity in infants exposed in utero; its use during pregnancy should be avoided if possible (AIII).
  • Hearing loss has been detected in approximately 2% of children exposed to long-term kanamycin therapy in utero; like streptomycin, this agent should typically be avoided, if possible (AIII). The fetus is at a theoretical risk for ototoxicity with in utero exposure to amikacin and capreomycin, but this risk has not been documented and these drugs might be alternatives when an aminoglycoside is required for treatment of MDR TB (CIII).
  • Because arthropathy has been noted in immature animals exposed to quinolones in utero, quinolones are typically not recommended for pregnant women or children aged <18 years (CIII). However, studies evaluating quinolone use in pregnant women did not find an increased risk of birth defects or musculoskeletal abnormalities.258,259 Thus, fluoroquinolones can be used in pregnancy for drug-resistant TB if they are required on the basis of susceptibility testing (CIII).260 
  • Para-aminosalicylic acid is not teratogenic in rats or rabbits.252 In one study, a possible increase in limb and ear anomalies was reported among 143 infants delivered by women who were exposed during the first trimester.261 No specific pattern of defects and no increase in rate of defects have been detected in subjects in other human studies, indicating that this agent can be used with caution, if needed (CIII).
  • Ethionamide has been associated with an increased risk for several anomalies in rats after high-dose exposure but not mice and rabbits.262-264 Case reports have documented cases of CNS defects in humans but overall experience is limited with use during human pregnancy.265 Thus, ethionamide should be avoided unless its use is required on the basis of susceptibility testing (CIII).
  • No data are available from animal studies or reports of cycloserine use in humans during pregnancy.

Recommendations for Treating Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection and Disease

Treating LTBI (to prevent TB disease)

Indications:

  • (+) screening testa for LTBI, no evidence of active TB, and no prior history of treatment for active or latent TB (AI);
  • Close contact with a person with infectious TB, regardless of screening test result (AII)

Preferred Therapy (Duration of Therapy = 9 Months):

  • INH 300 mg PO daily + pyridoxine 25-50 mg PO daily (AII) or 
  • INH 900 mg PO twice weekly (by DOT) + pyridoxine 25-50 mg PO daily (BII)

Alternative Therapies:

  • RIF 600 mg PO daily x 4 months (BIII) or
  • RFB (dose adjusted based on concomitant ART) x 4 months (BIII) or
  • RPT (weight-based, 900 mg max) PO weekly + INH 15 mg/kg weekly (900 mg max) + pyridoxine 50 mg weekly x 12 weeks – in patients receiving an EFV- or RAL-based ART regimen (BIII)
    • 32.1–49.9 kg 750 mg 
    • ≥50.0 kg 900 mg
  • For persons exposed to drug-resistant TB, select anti-TB drugs after consultation with experts or with public health authorities (AII) 

Treating Active TB Disease

  • After collecting specimen for culture and molecular diagnostic tests, empiric treatment should be initiated in HIV-infected persons with clinical and radiographic presentation suggestive of HIV-related TB (AIII)
  • DOT is recommended for all patients requiring treatment for HIV-related TB (AII)
  • Please refer to the table below for TB drug dosing recommendations and to the Adult and Adolescent ARV Guidelines for dosing recommendations of ARV drugs when used with RIF or RFB.

For Drug-Sensitive TB

Intensive Phase (2 Months)

  • INH + (RIF or RFB) + PZA + EMB (AI); if drug susceptibility report shows sensitivity to INH & RIF, then EMB may be discontinued.

Continuation Phase (For Drug Susceptible TB)

  • INH + (RIF or RFB) daily (5–7 days per week) (AII)  

Total Duration of Therapy:

  • Pulmonary, drug-susceptible TB—6 months (BII)
  • Pulmonary TB & positive culture at 2 months of TB treatment—9 months (BII) 
  • Extrapulmonary TB w/CNS involvement—9 to 12 months (BII)
  • Extrapulmonary TB w/bone or joint involvement—6 to 9 months (BII)
  • Extrapulmonary TB in other sites—6 months (BII) 

For Drug-Resistant TB

Empiric Therapy for Suspected Resistance to Rifamycin +/- Resistance to Other Drugs:

  • INH + (RIF or RFB) + PZA + EMB + (moxifloxacin or levofloxacin) + (an aminoglycoside or capreomycin)
  • Therapy should be modified based on drug susceptibility results
  • A TB expert should be consulted
Resistant to INH

  • (RIF or RFB) + EMB + PZA + (moxifloxacin or levofloxacin) for 2 months (BIII); followed by (RIF or RFB) + EMB + (moxifloxacin or levofloxacin) for 7 months (BII)
Resistant to Rifamycins +/- Other Antimycobacterial Agents:
  • Therapy and duration of treatment should be individualized based on drug susceptibility, clinical and microbiological responses, and with close consultation with experienced specialists (AIII).

Other Considerations in TB Management

  • Adjunctive corticosteroid improves survival for patients with HIV-related TB involving the CNS and pericardium (AI)
  • Dexamethasone has been used for CNS disease with the following dosing schedule: 0.3–0.4 mg/kg/day for 2–4 weeks, then taper 0.1 mg/kg per week until 0.1 mg/kg, then 4 mg per day and taper by 1 mg/week; total duration of 12 weeks.
  • Prednisone or prednisolone may be used in pericardial disease (e.g., 60 mg PO daily and taper by 10 mg per day weekly; total duration 6 weeks)
  • Despite the potential of drug-drug interactions, a rifamycin remains the most potent TB drug and should remain as part of the TB regimen unless there is rifamycin-resistant isolate or the patient has a severe adverse effect that is likely to be due to the rifamycin (please refer to the table below and to the Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents for dosing recommendations involving concomitant use of RIF or RFB and different antiretroviral drugs).
  • If NVP is to be added to a patient who is receiving RIF, the lead-in dose for NVP should be omitted.
  • RFB is a less potent CYP 3A4 inducer than RIF and is preferred in patients receiving HIV PIs (BIII).
  • Rifamycins administered once or twice weekly can result in development of resistance in HIV-infected patients and is not recommended for patients with TB disease (AI).
  • Paradoxical reaction that is not severe may be treated symptomatically (CIII).
  • For moderately severe paradoxical reaction, use of corticosteroid may be considered.Taper over 4 weeks (or longer) based on clinical symptoms (BIII).

Examples of Prednisone Dosing Strategies

  • In patients on a RIF-based regimen: prednisone 1.5 mg/kg/day x 2 weeks, then 0.75 mg/kg x 2 weeks
  • In patients on a RFB + boosted PI based regimen: prednisone 1.0 mg/kg/day x 2 weeks, then 0.5 mg/kg/day x 2 weeks
  • A more gradual tapering schedule over a few months may be necessary in some patients.

a Screening tests for LTBI include TST or IGRA; please see text for details regarding these tests.

Key to Abbreviations: ART = antiretroviral therapy; ARV = antiretroviral; CNS = central nervous system; DOT = directly observed therapy; EFV = efavirenz; EMB = ethambutol; INH = isoniazid; LTBI = latent tuberculosis infection; NVP = nevirapine; PI = protease inhibitor; PO = per os (oral); PZA = pyrazinamide; RAL = raltegravir; RFB = rifabutin; RIF = rifampin; RPT = rifapentine; TB = tuberculosis; TIW = thrice weekly; TST = tuberculin skin test; IGRA = interferon-gamma release assays

Dosing Recommendations for Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs for Treatment of Active TB
Drug Daily
Isoniazid 5 mg/kg (usual dose 300 mg)
Rifampina
Note: Rifampin is not recommended in patients receiving HIV PIs, ETR, RPV,
EVG/COBI or TAF
10 mg/kg (usual dose 600 mg)
Rifabutina
without HIV PIs, EFV, RPV
5 mg/kg (usual dose 300 mg)
with HIV PIs 150 mgb
with EFV 450–600 mg
withTAF or EVG/COBI containing regimens not recommended
Pyrazinamide
(weight-based dosing)
40–55 kg
1000 mg (18.2–25.0 mg/kg)

56–75 kg 1500 mg (20.0–26.8 mg/kg)
76-90 kg 2000 mg (22.2–26.3 mg/kg)
>90 kg 2000 mgc
Ethambutol

40–55 kg
800 mg (14.5–20.0 mg/kg)

56–75 kg 1200 mg (16.0–21.4 mg/kg)
76-90 kg 1600 mg (17.8–21.1 mg/kg)
>90 kg 1600 mgc

a For more detailed guidelines on use of different antiretroviral drugs with rifamycin, clinicians should refer to the Drug Interactions section of the Adult and Adolescent ARV Guidelines
b Acquired rifamycin resistance has been reported in patients with inadequate rifabutin levels while on 150 mg twice weekly dosing together with ritonavir-boosted PIs. May consider therapeutic drug monitoring when rifabutin is used with a ritonavir-boosted PI and adjust dose accordingly.
c Monitor for therapeutic response and consider therapeutic drug monitoring to assure dosage adequacy in patients who weigh >90 kg.

Key to Acronyms: COBI = cobicistat; EFV = efavirenz; EVG = elvitegravir; FTC = emtricitabine; MVC = maraviroc; NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI = protease inhibitor; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva: World Health Organization;2015. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf.
  2. Selwyn PA, Hartel D, Lewis VA, et al. A prospective study of the risk of tuberculosis among intravenous drug users with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. Mar 2 1989;320(9):545-550. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2915665.
  3. Sonnenberg P, Glynn JR, Fielding K, Murray J, Godfrey-Faussett P, Shearer S. How soon after infection with HIV does the risk of tuberculosis start to increase? A retrospective cohort study in South African gold miners. J Infect Dis. Jan 15 2005;191(2):150-158. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15609223.
  4. Wood R, Maartens G, Lombard CJ. Risk factors for developing tuberculosis in HIV-1-infected adults from communities with a low or very high incidence of tuberculosis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Jan 1 2000;23(1):75-80. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10708059.
  5. Jones JL, Hanson DL, Dworkin MS, DeCock KM, Adult/Adolescent Spectrum of HIVDG. HIV-associated tuberculosis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The Adult/Adolescent Spectrum of HIV Disease Group. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Nov 2000;4(11):1026-1031. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11092714.
  6. Severe P, Juste MA, Ambroise A, et al. Early versus standard antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected adults in Haiti. N Engl J Med. Jul 15 2010;363(3):257-265. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647201.
  7. Badri M, Wilson D, Wood R. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on incidence of tuberculosis in South Africa: a cohort study. Lancet. Jun 15 2002;359(9323):2059-2064. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12086758.
  8. Seyler C, Toure S, Messou E, Bonard D, Gabillard D, Anglaret X. Risk factors for active tuberculosis after antiretroviral treatment initiation in Abidjan. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jul 1 2005;172(1):123-127. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15805184.
  9. Scott C, Kirking HL, Jeffries C, et al. Tuberculosis trends--United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Mar 20 2015;64(10):265-269. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789741.
  10. Miramontes R, Hill AN, Yelk Woodruff RS, et al. Tuberculosis Infection in the United States: Prevalence Estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0140881. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26536035.
  11. Albalak R, O'Brien RJ, Kammerer JS, et al. Trends in tuberculosis/human immunodeficiency virus comorbidity, United States,1993-2004. Arch Intern Med. Dec 10 2007;167(22):2443-2452. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18071166.
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported Tuberculosis in the United States, 2013. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC;2014. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/reports/2013/pdf/report2013.pdf.
  13. Trieu L, Li J, Hanna DB, Harris TG. Tuberculosis rates among HIV-infected persons in New York City, 2001-2005. Am J Public Health. Jun 2010;100(6):1031-1034. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20395574.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. MMWR Recomm Rep. Jun 9 2000;49(RR-6):1-51. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10881762.
  15. Horsburgh CR, Jr. Priorities for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. May 13 2004;350(20):2060-2067. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15141044.
  16. Day JH, Grant AD, Fielding KL, et al. Does tuberculosis increase HIV load? J Infect Dis. Nov 1 2004;190(9):1677-1684. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15478075.
  17. Lopez-Gatell H, Cole SR, Margolick JB, et al. Effect of tuberculosis on the survival of HIV-infected men in a country with low tuberculosis incidence. AIDS. Sep 12 2008;22(14):1869-1873. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18753866.
  18. Akolo C, Adetifa I, Shepperd S, Volmink J. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV infected persons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(1):CD000171. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091503.
  19. Golub JE, Saraceni V, Cavalcante SC, et al. The impact of antiretroviral therapy and isoniazid preventive therapy on tuberculosis incidence in HIV-infected patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS. Jul 11 2007;21(11):1441-1448. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17589190.
  20. Durovni B, Saraceni V, Moulton LH, et al. Effect of improved tuberculosis screening and isoniazid preventive therapy on incidence of tuberculosis and death in patients with HIV in clinics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis. Oct 2013;13(10):852-858. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954450.
  21. Temprano Anrs Study Group, Danel C, Moh R, et al. A Trial of Early Antiretrovirals and Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in Africa. N Engl J Med. Aug 27 2015;373(9):808-822. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26193126.
  22. Rangaka MX, Wilkinson RJ, Boulle A, et al. Isoniazid plus antiretroviral therapy to prevent tuberculosis: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. Aug 23 2014;384(9944):682-690. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24835842.
  23. Golub JE, Cohn S, Saraceni V, et al. Long-term protection from isoniazid preventive therapy for tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients in a medium-burden tuberculosis setting: the TB/HIV in Rio (THRio) study. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 15 2015;60(4):639-645. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365974.
  24. Gordin FM, Matts JP, Miller C, et al. A controlled trial of isoniazid in persons with anergy and human immunodeficiency virus infection who are at high risk for tuberculosis. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS. N Engl J Med. Jul 31 1997;337(5):315-320. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9233868.
  25. Samandari T, Agizew TB, Nyirenda S, et al. 6-month versus 36-month isoniazid preventive treatment for tuberculosis in adults with HIV infection in Botswana: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. May 7 2011;377(9777):1588-1598. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21492926.
  26. Fisk TL, Hon HM, Lennox JL, Fordham von Reyn C, Horsburgh CR, Jr. Detection of latent tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. May 2 2003;17(7):1102-1104. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12700468.
  27. Girardi E, Palmieri F, Zaccarelli M, et al. High incidence of tuberculin skin test conversion among HIV-infected individuals who have a favourable immunological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. Sep 27 2002;16(14):1976-1979. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12351964.
  28. Markowitz N, Hansen NI, Wilcosky TC, et al. Tuberculin and anergy testing in HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative persons. Pulmonary Complications of HIV Infection Study Group. Ann Intern Med. Aug 1 1993;119(3):185-193. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8100692.
  29. Ewer K, Deeks J, Alvarez L, et al. Comparison of T-cell-based assay with tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a school tuberculosis outbreak. Lancet. Apr 5 2003;361(9364):1168-1173. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12686038.
  30. Nahid P, Pai M, Hopewell PC. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(1):103-110. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16493157.
  31. Menzies D, Pai M, Comstock G. Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research. Ann Intern Med. Mar 6 2007;146(5):340-354. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17339619.
  32. Raby E, Moyo M, Devendra A, et al. The effects of HIV on the sensitivity of a whole blood IFN-gamma release assay in Zambian adults with active tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2489. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18560573.
  33. Dorman SE, Belknap R, Graviss EA, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays and tuberculin skin testing for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jan 1 2014;189(1):77-87. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24299555.
  34. Gray J, Reves R, Johnson S, Belknap R. Identification of false-positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assays by repeat testing in HIV-infected patients at low risk for tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2012;54(3):e20-23. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22057704.
  35. Luetkemeyer AF, Charlebois ED, Flores LL, et al. Comparison of an interferon-gamma release assay with tuberculin skin testing in HIV-infected individuals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Apr 1 2007;175(7):737-742. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218620.
  36. Talati NJ, Seybold U, Humphrey B, et al. Poor concordance between interferon-gamma release assays and tuberculin skin tests in diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection among HIV-infected individuals. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:15. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19208218.
  37. Hill PC, Jackson-Sillah DJ, Fox A, et al. Incidence of tuberculosis and the predictive value of ELISPOT and Mantoux tests in Gambian case contacts. PLoS One. 2008;3(1):e1379. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18167540.
  38. Aichelburg MC, Rieger A, Breitenecker F, et al. Detection and prediction of active tuberculosis disease by a whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay in HIV-1-infected individuals. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 1 2009;48(7):954-962. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19245343.
  39. Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Meywald-Walter K, Niemann S, Nienhaus A. Predictive value of a whole blood IFN-gamma assay for the development of active tuberculosis disease after recent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. May 15 2008;177(10):1164-1170. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18276940.
  40. Leung CC, Yam WC, Yew WW, et al. T-Spot.TB outperforms tuberculin skin test in predicting tuberculosis disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Sep 15 2010;182(6):834-840. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20508217.
  41. Wilson IB, Landon BE, Hirschhorn LR, et al. Quality of HIV care provided by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians. Ann Intern Med. Nov 15 2005;143(10):729-736. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16287794.
  42. Backus LI, Boothroyd DB, Phillips BR, et al. National quality forum performance measures for HIV/AIDS care: the Department of Veterans Affairs' experience. Arch Intern Med. Jul 26 2010;170(14):1239-1246. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20660844.
  43. Lee LM, Lobato MN, Buskin SE, Morse A, Costa OS. Low adherence to guidelines for preventing TB among persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection, United States. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Feb 2006;10(2):209-214. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16499263.
  44. Mazurek GH, Jereb J, Vernon A, et al. Updated guidelines for using Interferon Gamma Release Assays to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection - United States, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. Jun 25 2010;59(RR-5):1-25. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20577159.
  45. Getahun H, Kittikraisak W, Heilig CM, et al. Development of a standardized screening rule for tuberculosis in people living with HIV in resource-constrained settings: individual participant data meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000391. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21267059.
  46. Whalen CC, Johnson JL, Okwera A, et al. A trial of three regimens to prevent tuberculosis in Ugandan adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Uganda-Case Western Reserve University Research Collaboration. N Engl J Med. Sep 18 1997;337(12):801-808. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9295239.
  47. Mwinga A, Hosp M, Godfrey-Faussett P, et al. Twice weekly tuberculosis preventive therapy in HIV infection in Zambia. AIDS. Dec 24 1998;12(18):2447-2457. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9875583.
  48. Mohammed A, Myer L, Ehrlich R, Wood R, Cilliers F, Maartens G. Randomised controlled trial of isoniazid preventive therapy in South African adults with advanced HIV disease. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Oct 2007;11(10):1114-1120. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17945069.
  49. Horsburgh CR, Jr., Goldberg S, Bethel J, et al. Latent TB infection treatment acceptance and completion in the United States and Canada. Chest. Feb 2010;137(2):401-409. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793865.
  50. Gordin F, Chaisson RE, Matts JP, et al. Rifampin and pyrazinamide vs isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons: an international randomized trial. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS, the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group, the Pan American Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Study Group. JAMA. Mar 15 2000;283(11):1445-1450. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10732934.
  51. Menzies D, Long R, Trajman A, et al. Adverse events with 4 months of rifampin therapy or 9 months of isoniazid therapy for latent tuberculosis infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. Nov 18 2008;149(10):689-697. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19017587.
  52. Li J, Munsiff SS, Tarantino T, Dorsinville M. Adherence to treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in a clinical population in New York City. Int J Infect Dis. Apr 2010;14(4):e292-297. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19656705.
  53. Sterling TR, Scott NA, Miro JM, et al. Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for treatment of M. tuberculosis infection in HIV co-infected persons. AIDS. Mar 17 2016. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26990624.
  54. Martinson NA, Barnes GL, Moulton LH, et al. New regimens to prevent tuberculosis in adults with HIV infection. N Engl J Med. Jul 7 2011;365(1):11-20. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21732833.
  55. Sterling T, Benson C, Scott N, et al. Three Months of Weekly Rifapentine + INH for M. tuberculosis Infection in HIV-Infected Persons. 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 3-6, 2014, 2014; Boston, Massachusetts.
  56. Podany AT, Bao Y, Swindells S, et al. Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in HIV-Infected Persons Receiving Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Prevention. Clin Infect Dis. Oct 15 2015;61(8):1322-1327. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082504.
  57. Farenc C, Doroumian S, Cantalloube C, et al. Rifapentine Once-Weekly Dosing Effect on Efavirenz Emtricitabine and Tenofovir PKs. 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2014; Boston, MA.
  58. Weiner M, Egelund EF, Engle M, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction of rifapentine and raltegravir in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother. Apr 2014;69(4):1079-1085. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24343893.
  59. Golub JE, Pronyk P, Mohapi L, et al. Isoniazid preventive therapy, HAART and tuberculosis risk in HIV-infected adults in South Africa: a prospective cohort. AIDS. Mar 13 2009;23(5):631-636. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19525621.
  60. Samandari T, Mosimaneotsile B, al. e. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 8 vs. 36 months of isoniazid TB preventative therapy for HIV-infected adults in Botswana. 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2010; San Fransisco, CA.
  61. Bliven-Sizemore EE, Sterling TR, Shang N, et al. Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid is less hepatotoxic than nine months of daily isoniazid for LTBI. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Sep 2015;19(9):1039-1044, i-v. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26260821.
  62. Saukkonen JJ, Cohn DL, Jasmer RM, et al. An official ATS statement: hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Oct 15 2006;174(8):935-952. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17021358.
  63. Rangaka MX, Wilkinson RJ, Glynn JR, et al. Effect of antiretroviral therapy on the diagnostic accuracy of symptom screening for intensified tuberculosis case finding in a South African HIV clinic. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 2012;55(12):1698-1706. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955441.
  64. Cain KP, McCarthy KD, Heilig CM, et al. An algorithm for tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in people with HIV. N Engl J Med. Feb 25 2010;362(8):707-716. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181972.
  65. Corbett EL, Charalambous S, Moloi VM, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus and the prevalence of undiagnosed tuberculosis in African gold miners. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Sep 15 2004;170(6):673-679. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15191919.
  66. Ahuja SS, Ahuja SK, Phelps KR, Thelmo W, Hill AR. Hemodynamic confirmation of septic shock in disseminated tuberculosis. Crit Care Med. Jun 1992;20(6):901-903. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1597048.
  67. Batungwanayo J, Taelman H, Dhote R, Bogaerts J, Allen S, Van de Perre P. Pulmonary tuberculosis in Kigali, Rwanda. Impact of human immunodeficiency virus infection on clinical and radiographic presentation. Am Rev Respir Dis. Jul 1992;146(1):53-56. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1626814.
  68. Jones BE, Young SM, Antoniskis D, Davidson PT, Kramer F, Barnes PF. Relationship of the manifestations of tuberculosis to CD4 cell counts in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. Nov 1993;148(5):1292-1297. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7902049.
  69. Perlman DC, el-Sadr WM, Nelson ET, et al. Variation of chest radiographic patterns in pulmonary tuberculosis by degree of human immunodeficiency virus-related immunosuppression. The Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA). The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG). Clin Infect Dis. Aug 1997;25(2):242-246. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9332519.
  70. Post F, Wood R, Pillay G. Pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV infection: radiographic appearance is related to CD4+ T-lymphocyte count. Tuber Lung Dis. 1995;76:518-21. 
  71. Pepper T, Joseph P, Mwenya C, et al. Normal chest radiography in pulmonary tuberculosis: implications for obtaining respiratory specimen cultures. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Apr 2008;12(4):397-403. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18371265.
  72. Shafer RW, Kim DS, Weiss JP, Quale JM. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Medicine (Baltimore). Nov 1991;70(6):384-397. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1956280.
  73. Whalen C, Horsburgh CR, Jr., Hom D, Lahart C, Simberkoff M, Ellner J. Site of disease and opportunistic infection predict survival in HIV-associated tuberculosis. AIDS. Mar 15 1997;11(4):455-460. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9084792.
  74. Kourbatova EV, Leonard MK, Jr., Romero J, Kraft C, del Rio C, Blumberg HM. Risk factors for mortality among patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis at an academic inner-city hospital in the US. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(9):715-721. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17072539.
  75. Thwaites GE, Nguyen DB, Nguyen HD, et al. Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med. Oct 21 2004;351(17):1741-1751. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15496623.
  76. Lewis JJ, Charalambous S, Day JH, et al. HIV infection does not affect active case finding of tuberculosis in South African gold miners. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Dec 15 2009;180(12):1271-1278. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19745207.
  77. Cavanaugh JS, Modi S, Musau S, et al. Comparative Yield of Different Diagnostic Tests for Tuberculosis among People Living with HIV in Western Kenya. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152364. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27023213.
  78. Henostroza G, Harris JB, Chitambi R, et al. High prevalence of tuberculosis in newly enrolled HIV patients in Zambia: need for enhanced screening approach. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Aug 2016;20(8):1033-1039. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27393536.
  79. Elliott AM, Halwiindi B, Hayes RJ, et al. The impact of human immunodeficiency virus on presentation and diagnosis of tuberculosis in a cohort study in Zambia. J Trop Med Hyg. Feb 1993;96(1):1-11. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8429569.
  80. Reid MJ, Shah NS. Approaches to tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in people with HIV in resource-limited settings. Lancet Infect Dis. Mar 2009;9(3):173-184. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246021.
  81. Monkongdee P, McCarthy KD, Cain KP, et al. Yield of acid-fast smear and mycobacterial culture for tuberculosis diagnosis in people with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Nov 1 2009;180(9):903-908. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19628775.
  82. Leeds IL, Magee MJ, Kurbatova EV, et al. Site of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is associated with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 2012;55(1):75-81. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423123.
  83. Naing C, Mak JW, Maung M, Wong SF, Kassim AI. Meta-analysis: the association between HIV infection and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Lung. Feb 2013;191(1):27-34. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180033.
  84. Shriner KA, Mathisen GE, Goetz MB. Comparison of mycobacterial lymphadenitis among persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus and seronegative controls. Clin Infect Dis. Oct 1992;15(4):601-605. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1420673.
  85. Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. Sep 9 2010;363(11):1005-1015. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20825313.
  86. Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kunst H, et al. A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection. Health Technol Assess. Jan 2007;11(3):1-196. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17266837.
  87. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Updated guidelines for the use of nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Jan 16 2009;58(1):7-10. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19145221.
  88. World Health Organization. Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF system. Policy statement. 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501545_eng.pdf. Accessed 2/18/2016.
  89. Food and Drug Adminstration. FDA permits marketing of first U.S. test labeled for simultaneous detection of tuberculosis bacteria and resistance to the antibiotic rifampin. 2013. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm362602.htm.
  90. Food and Drug Adminstration. New data shows test can help physicians remove patients with suspected TB from isolation earlier. 2015. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm434226.htm.
  91. Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert(R) MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD009593. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24448973.
  92. Luetkemeyer AF, Kendall MA, Wu X, et al. Evaluation of two line probe assays for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, tuberculosis (TB) drug resistance, and non-TB Mycobacteria in HIV-infected individuals with suspected TB. J Clin Microbiol. Apr 2014;52(4):1052-1059. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24430455.
  93. Lawn SD, Kerkhoff AD, Vogt M, Wood R. HIV-associated tuberculosis: relationship between disease severity and the sensitivity of new sputum-based and urine-based diagnostic assays. BMC Med. 2013;11:231. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24168211.
  94. Maynard-Smith L, Larke N, Peters JA, Lawn SD. Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis when testing non-respiratory samples: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:709. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25599808.
  95. Drain PK, Losina E, Coleman SM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care urine test for tuberculosis screening among newly-diagnosed HIV-infected adults: a prospective, clinic-based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:110. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571362.
  96. Drain PK, Losina E, Coleman SM, et al. Value of urine lipoarabinomannan grade and second test for optimizing clinic-based screening for HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Mar 1 2015;68(3):274-280. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25415288.
  97. Lawn SD, Dheda K, Kerkhoff AD, et al. Determine TB-LAM lateral flow urine antigen assay for HIV-associated tuberculosis: recommendations on the design and reporting of clinical studies. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:407. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004840.
  98. Kerkhoff AD, Wood R, Vogt M, Lawn SD. Prognostic value of a quantitative analysis of lipoarabinomannan in urine from patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103285. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075867.
  99. Peter JG, Theron G, van Zyl-Smit R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a urine lipoarabinomannan strip-test for TB detection in HIV-infected hospitalised patients. Eur Respir J. Nov 2012;40(5):1211-1220. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22362849.
  100. Shah M, Ssengooba W, Armstrong D, et al. Comparative performance of urinary lipoarabinomannan assays and Xpert MTB/RIF in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS. Jun 1 2014;28(9):1307-1314. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637544.
  101. Lew W, Pai M, Oxlade O, Martin D, Menzies D. Initial drug resistance and tuberculosis treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. Jul 15 2008;149(2):123-134. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18626051.
  102. Gandhi NR, Shah NS, Andrews JR, et al. HIV coinfection in multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis results in high early mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jan 1 2010;181(1):80-86. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833824.
  103. Moore DA, Evans CA, Gilman RH, et al. Microscopic-observation drug-susceptibility assay for the diagnosis of TB. N Engl J Med. Oct 12 2006;355(15):1539-1550. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17035648.
  104. Mathema B, Kurepina NE, Bifani PJ, Kreiswirth BN. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: current insights. Clin Microbiol Rev. Oct 2006;19(4):658-685. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17041139.
  105. Barnard M, Warren R, Gey Van Pittius N, et al. Genotype MTBDRsl line probe assay shortens time to diagnosis of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-throughput diagnostic laboratory. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Dec 15 2012;186(12):1298-1305. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23087027.
  106. World Health Organization. The Use of Molecular Line Probe Assay for the Detection of Resistance to Second-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs. Geneva2013. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78099/1/WHO_HTM_TB_2013.01.eng.pdf.
  107. Osman M, Simpson JA, Caldwell J, Bosman M, Nicol MP. GeneXpert MTB/RIF version G4 for identification of rifampin-resistant tuberculosis in a programmatic setting. J Clin Microbiol. Feb 2014;52(2):635-637. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478501.
  108. Van Deun A, Aung KJ, Bola V, et al. Rifampin drug resistance tests for tuberculosis: challenging the gold standard. J Clin Microbiol. Aug 2013;51(8):2633-2640. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761144.
  109. Rigouts L, Gumusboga M, de Rijk WB, et al. Rifampin resistance missed in automated liquid culture system for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with specific rpoB mutations. J Clin Microbiol. Aug 2013;51(8):2641-2645. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761146.
  110. Williamson DA, Roberts SA, Bower JE, et al. Clinical failures associated with rpoB mutations in phenotypically occult multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Feb 2012;16(2):216-220. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22137551.
  111. Ho J, Jelfs P, Sintchencko V. Phenotypically occult multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: dilemmas in diagnosis and treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother. Dec 2013;68(12):2915-2920. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23838950.
  112. Swaminathan S, Narendran G, Venkatesan P, et al. Efficacy of a 6-month versus 9-month intermittent treatment regimen in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Apr 1 2010;181(7):743-751. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19965813.
  113. Nettles RE, Mazo D, Alwood K, et al. Risk factors for relapse and acquired rifamycin resistance after directly observed tuberculosis treatment: a comparison by HIV serostatus and rifamycin use. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2004;38(5):731-736. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14986259.
  114. Li J, Munsiff SS, Driver CR, Sackoff J. Relapse and acquired rifampin resistance in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin- or rifabutin-based regimens in New York City, 1997-2000. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 1 2005;41(1):83-91. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15937767.
  115. Khan FA, Minion J, Pai M, et al. Treatment of active tuberculosis in HIV-coinfected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. May 1 2010;50(9):1288-1299. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353364.
  116. Vashishtha R, Mohan K, Singh B, et al. Efficacy and safety of thrice weekly DOTS in tuberculosis patients with and without HIV co-infection: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:468. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099345.
  117. Narendran G, Menon PA, Venkatesan P, et al. Acquired rifampicin resistance in thrice-weekly antituberculosis therapy: impact of HIV and antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 15 2014;59(12):1798-1804. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25156114.
  118. Vernon A, Burman W, Benator D, Khan A, Bozeman L. Acquired rifamycin monoresistance in patients with HIV-related tuberculosis treated with once-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid. Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Lancet. May 29 1999;353(9167):1843-1847. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10359410.
  119. Burman W, Benator D, Vernon A, et al. Acquired rifamycin resistance with twice-weekly treatment of HIV-related tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Feb 1 2006;173(3):350-356. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16109981.
  120. Reynolds HE, Chrdle A, Egan D, et al. Effect of intermittent rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of raltegravir. J Antimicrob Chemother. Feb 2015;70(2):550-554. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25261424.
  121. el-Sadr WM, Perlman DC, Matts JP, et al. Evaluation of an intensive intermittent-induction regimen and duration of short-course treatment for human immunodeficiency virus-related pulmonary tuberculosis. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG). Clin Infect Dis. May 1998;26(5):1148-1158. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9597244.
  122. Perriens JH, St Louis ME, Mukadi YB, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients in Zaire. A controlled trial of treatment for either 6 or 12 months. N Engl J Med. Mar 23 1995;332(12):779-784. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7862181.
  123. Jawahar MS, Banurekha VV, Paramasivan CN, et al. Randomized clinical trial of thrice-weekly 4-month moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin containing regimens in the treatment of new sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e67030. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23843980.
  124. Merle CS, Fielding K, Sow OB, et al. A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Oct 23 2014;371(17):1588-1598. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337748.
  125. Gillespie SH, Crook AM, McHugh TD, et al. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Oct 23 2014;371(17):1577-1587. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25196020.
  126. Jindani A, Harrison TS, Nunn AJ, et al. High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Oct 23 2014;371(17):1599-1608. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337749.
  127. Heemskerk AD, Bang ND, Mai NT, et al. Intensified Antituberculosis Therapy in Adults with Tuberculous Meningitis. N Engl J Med. Jan 14 2016;374(2):124-134. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26760084.
  128. Ruslami R, Ganiem AR, Aarnoutse RE, van Crevel R, study t. Rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis--authors' reply. Lancet Infect Dis. Jul 2013;13(7):570. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23809224.
  129. Mayosi BM, Ntsekhe M, Bosch J, et al. Prednisolone and Mycobacterium indicus pranii in tuberculous pericarditis. N Engl J Med. Sep 18 2014;371(12):1121-1130. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25178809.
  130. Abdool Karim SS, Naidoo K, Grobler A, et al. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral drugs during tuberculosis therapy. N Engl J Med. Feb 25 2010;362(8):697-706. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181971.
  131. Mfinanga SG, Kirenga BJ, Chanda DM, et al. Early versus delayed initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV-positive adults with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis (TB-HAART): a prospective, international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. Jul 2014;14(7):563-571. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24810491.
  132. INSIGHT START Study Group, Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, et al. Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection. N Engl J Med. Aug 27 2015;373(9):795-807. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26192873.
  133. Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Ribaudo HJ, et al. Effects of early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infection: results from the phase 3 HPTN 052 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. Apr 2014;14(4):281-290. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602844.
  134. Havlir DV, Ive P, al. e. International randomized trial of immediate vs. early antiretroviral therapy in HIV+ patients treated for tuberculosis: ACTG 5221 "STRIDE" study. Paper presented at: 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections2011; Boston, MA.
  135. Blanc FX, Sok T, et al. Significant enhancement in survival with early (2 weeks) vs. late (8 weeks) initiation of higly active antiretrotherapy (HAART) in severely immunosuppresed HIV-infected adults with newly diagnosed tuberculosis. 18th International AIDS Conference; 2010; Vienna, Austria.
  136. Nahid P, Gonzalez LC, Rudoy I, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients with HIV and tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jun 1 2007;175(11):1199-1206. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17290042.
  137. Blanc FX, Sok T, Laureillard D, et al. Earlier versus later start of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults with tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Oct 20 2011;365(16):1471-1481. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22010913.
  138. Havlir DV, Kendall MA, Ive P, et al. Timing of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection and tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Oct 20 2011;365(16):1482-1491. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22010914.
  139. Torok ME, Yen NT, Chau TT, et al. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)--associated tuberculous meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 2011;52(11):1374-1383. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21596680.
  140. Boulle A, Van Cutsem G, Cohen K, et al. Outcomes of nevirapine- and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy when coadministered with rifampicin-based antitubercular therapy. JAMA. Aug 6 2008;300(5):530-539. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18677025.
  141. Lopez-Cortes LF, Ruiz-Valderas R, Viciana P, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between efavirenz and rifampicin in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(9):681-690. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12126459.
  142. Cohen K, Grant A, Dandara C, et al. Effect of rifampicin-based antitubercular therapy and the cytochrome P450 2B6 516G>T polymorphism on efavirenz concentrations in adults in South Africa. Antivir Ther. 2009;14(5):687-695. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19704172.
  143. Ramachandran G, Hemanth Kumar AK, Rajasekaran S, et al. CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism but not rifampin coadministration influences steady-state pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in South India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Mar 2009;53(3):863-868. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19124658.
  144. Luetkemeyer AF, Rosenkranz SL, Lu D, et al. Relationship between weight, efavirenz exposure, and virologic suppression in HIV-infected patients on rifampin-based tuberculosis treatment in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5221 STRIDE Study. Clin Infect Dis. Aug 2013;57(4):586-593. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23592830.
  145. Manosuthi W, Kiertiburanakul S, Sungkanuparph S, et al. Efavirenz 600 mg/day versus efavirenz 800 mg/day in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis receiving rifampicin: 48 weeks results. AIDS. Jan 2 2006;20(1):131-132. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16327334.
  146. Manosuthi W, Sungkanuparph S, Thakkinstian A, et al. Plasma nevirapine levels and 24-week efficacy in HIV-infected patients receiving nevirapine-based highly active antiretroviral therapy with or without rifampicin. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 15 2006;43(2):253-255. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16779754.
  147. Shipton LK, Wester CW, Stock S, et al. Safety and efficacy of nevirapine- and efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment in adults treated for TB-HIV co-infection in Botswana. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Mar 2009;13(3):360-366. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19275797.
  148. Bonnet M, Bhatt N, Baudin E, et al. Nevirapine versus efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. Apr 2013;13(4):303-312. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23433590.
  149. Swaminathan S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Venkatesan P, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily nevirapine- or efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-associated tuberculosis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. Oct 2011;53(7):716-724. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21890776.
  150. Bhatt NB, Baudin E, Meggi B, et al. Nevirapine or efavirenz for tuberculosis and HIV coinfected patients: exposure and virological failure relationship. J Antimicrob Chemother. Jan 2015;70(1):225-232. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25239466.
  151. Jiang HY, Zhang MN, Chen HJ, Yang Y, Deng M, Ruan B. Nevirapine versus efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. Aug 2014;25:130-135. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24911886.
  152. Grinsztejn B, De Castro N, Arnold V, et al. Raltegravir for the treatment of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis (ANRS 12 180 Reflate TB): a multicentre, phase 2, non-comparative, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis. Jun 2014;14(6):459-467. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24726095.
  153. Davies G, Cerri S, Richeldi L. Rifabutin for treating pulmonary tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(4):CD005159. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17943842.
  154. Singh R, Marshall N, Smith CJ, et al. No impact of rifamycin selection on tuberculosis treatment outcome in HIV coinfected patients. AIDS. Jan 28 2013;27(3):481-484. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23014518.
  155. la Porte CJ, Colbers EP, Bertz R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of adjusted-dose lopinavir-ritonavir combined with rifampin in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. May 2004;48(5):1553-1560. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15105105.
  156. Decloedt EH, McIlleron H, Smith P, Merry C, Orrell C, Maartens G. Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in HIV-infected adults receiving rifampin with adjusted doses of lopinavir-ritonavir tablets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jul 2011;55(7):3195-3200. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21537021.
  157. Nijland HM, L'Homme R F, Rongen GA, et al. High incidence of adverse events in healthy volunteers receiving rifampicin and adjusted doses of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets. AIDS. May 11 2008;22(8):931-935. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18453852.
  158. Haas DW, Koletar SL, Laughlin L, et al. Hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal intolerance when healthy volunteers taking rifampin add twice-daily atazanavir and ritonavir. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Mar 1 2009;50(3):290-293. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19194314.
  159. Schmitt C, Riek M, Winters K, Schutz M, Grange S. Unexpected Hepatotoxicity of Rifampin and Saquinavir/Ritonavir in Healthy Male Volunteers. Arch Drug Inf. Mar 2009;2(1):8-16. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19381336.
  160. Decloedt EH, Maartens G, Smith P, Merry C, Bango F, McIlleron H. The safety, effectiveness and concentrations of adjusted lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected adults on rifampicin-based antitubercular therapy. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32173. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22412856.
  161. Sunpath H, Winternheimer P, Cohen S, et al. Double-dose lopinavir-ritonavir in combination with rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis treatment in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Jun 2014;18(6):689-693. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24903940.
  162. Abbott. Lopinavir/ritonavir package insert. 2011.
  163. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Atazanavir package insert. 2011.
  164. Sekar V, Lavreys L, Van de Casteele T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and rifabutin coadministered in HIV-negative healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Oct 2010;54(10):4440-4445. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20660678.
  165. Ford SL, Chen YC, Lou Y, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between fosamprenavir-ritonavir and rifabutin in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Feb 2008;52(2):534-538. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18056271.
  166. Lin HC, Lu PL, Chang CH. Uveitis associated with concurrent administration of rifabutin and lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra). Eye (Lond). Dec 2007;21(12):1540-1541. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17962822.
  167. Lan NT, Thu NT, Barrail-Tran A, et al. Randomised pharmacokinetic trial of rifabutin with lopinavir/ritonavir-antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84866. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465443.
  168. Naiker S, Connolly C, Wiesner L, et al. Randomized pharmacokinetic evaluation of different rifabutin doses in African HIV- infected tuberculosis patients on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;15:61. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25406657.
  169. Jenny-Avital ER, Joseph K. Rifamycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: a report of 3 relapses with acquired rifampin resistance following alternate-day rifabutin and boosted protease inhibitor therapy. Clin Infect Dis. May 15 2009;48(10):1471-1474. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19368504.
  170. Boulanger C, Hollender E, Farrell K, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of rifabutin in combination with lopinavir-ritonavir in patients with HIV infection and active tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. Nov 1 2009;49(9):1305-1311. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19807276.
  171. Wenning LA, Hanley WD, Brainard DM, et al. Effect of rifampin, a potent inducer of drug-metabolizing enzymes, on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jul 2009;53(7):2852-2856. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19433563.
  172. Brainard DM, Wenning LA, Stone JA, Wagner JA, Iwamoto M. Clinical pharmacology profile of raltegravir, an HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol. Oct 2011;51(10):1376-1402. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21209233.
  173. Dooley KE, Sayre P, Borland J, et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir given twice daily with rifampin or once daily with rifabutin: results of a phase 1 study among healthy subjects. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Jan 1 2013;62(1):21-27. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23075918.
  174. Johnson JL, Okwera A, Nsubuga P, et al. Efficacy of an unsupervised 8-month rifampicin-containing regimen for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected adults. Uganda-Case Western Reserve University Research Collaboration. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Nov 2000;4(11):1032-1040. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11092715.
  175. Jindani A, Nunn AJ, Enarson DA. Two 8-month regimens of chemotherapy for treatment of newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis: international multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. Oct 2-8 2004;364(9441):1244-1251. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15464185.
  176. Benator D, Bhattacharya M, Bozeman L, et al. Rifapentine and isoniazid once a week versus rifampicin and isoniazid twice a week for treatment of drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative patients: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. Aug 17 2002;360(9332):528-534. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12241657.
  177. McIlleron H, Meintjes G, Burman WJ, Maartens G. Complications of antiretroviral therapy in patients with tuberculosis: drug interactions, toxicity, and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis. Aug 15 2007;196 Suppl 1:S63-75. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17624828.
  178. Bliven-Sizemore EE, Johnson JL, Goldberg S, et al. Effect of HIV infection on tolerability and bacteriologic outcomes of tuberculosis treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Apr 2012;16(4):473-479. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22325844.
  179. Steele MA, Burk RF, DesPrez RM. Toxic hepatitis with isoniazid and rifampin. A meta-analysis. Chest. Feb 1991;99(2):465-471. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1824929.
  180. Sharma SK, Singla R, Sarda P, et al. Safety of 3 different reintroduction regimens of antituberculosis drugs after development of antituberculosis treatment-induced hepatotoxicity. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 15 2010;50(6):833-839. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20156055.
  181. Tahaoglu K, Atac G, Sevim T, et al. The management of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Jan 2001;5(1):65-69. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11263519.
  182. Lehloenya RJ, Todd G, Badri M, Dheda K. Outcomes of reintroducing anti-tuberculosis drugs following cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Dec 2011;15(12):1649-1657. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22118173.
  183. Menzies D, Benedetti A, Paydar A, et al. Standardized treatment of active tuberculosis in patients with previous treatment and/or with mono-resistance to isoniazid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. Sep 2009;6(9):e1000150. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20101802.
  184. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Geneva2011. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44597/1/9789241501583_eng.pdf?ua=1.
  185. Ahuja SD, Ashkin D, Avendano M, et al. Multidrug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treatment regimens and patient outcomes: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 9,153 patients. PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001300. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952439.
  186. Kempker RR, Vashakidze S, Solomonia N, Dzidzikashvili N, Blumberg HM. Surgical treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. Feb 2012;12(2):157-166. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22281142.
  187. World Health Organization. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis – 2016 Update. 2016. Available at http://www.who.int/tb/areas-of-work/drug-resistant-tb/MDRTBguidelines2016.pdf.
  188. Aung KJ, Van Deun A, Declercq E, et al. Successful '9-month Bangladesh regimen' for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among over 500 consecutive patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Oct 2014;18(10):1180-1187. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216831.
  189. Sirturo [package insert]; Janssen Therapeutics; Titusville, NJ; 2012. Available at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/204384s000lbl.pdf. Available at 
  190. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Provisional CDC Guidelines for the Use and Safety Monitoring of Bedaquiline Fumarate (Sirturo) for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. MMWR Recomm Rep. Oct 25 2013;62(RR-09):1-12. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24157696.
  191. Svensson EM, Dooley KE, Karlsson MO. Impact of lopinavir-ritonavir or nevirapine on bedaquiline exposures and potential implications for patients with tuberculosis-HIV coinfection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov 2014;58(11):6406-6412. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114140.
  192. Pandie M, Wiesner L, McIlleron H, et al. Drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and the antiretrovirals lopinavir/ritonavir and nevirapine in HIV-infected patients with drug-resistant TB. J Antimicrob Chemother. Apr 2016;71(4):1037-1040. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26747099.
  193. Gler MT, Skripconoka V, Sanchez-Garavito E, et al. Delamanid for multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Jun 7 2012;366(23):2151-2160. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22670901.
  194. French MA, Price P, Stone SF. Immune restoration disease after antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. Aug 20 2004;18(12):1615-1627. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15280772.
  195. Lawn SD, Bekker LG, Miller RF. Immune reconstitution disease associated with mycobacterial infections in HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretrovirals. Lancet Infect Dis. Jun 2005;5(6):361-373. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15919622.
  196. Meintjes G, Rabie H, Wilkinson RJ, Cotton MF. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and unmasking of tuberculosis by antiretroviral therapy. Clin Chest Med. Dec 2009;30(4):797-810, x. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19925968.
  197. Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Scano F, et al. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: case definitions for use in resource-limited settings. Lancet Infect Dis. Aug 2008;8(8):516-523. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18652998.
  198. Muller M, Wandel S, Colebunders R, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients starting antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. Apr 2010;10(4):251-261. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334848.
  199. Burman W, Weis S, Vernon A, et al. Frequency, severity and duration of immune reconstitution events in HIV-related tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Dec 2007;11(12):1282-1289. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18229435.
  200. Pepper DJ, Marais S, Maartens G, et al. Neurologic manifestations of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a case series. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1 2009;48(11):e96-107. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19405867.
  201. Lawn SD, Wood R. Hepatic involvement with tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution disease. AIDS. Nov 12 2007;21(17):2362-2363. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18090294.
  202. Meintjes G, Rangaka MX, Maartens G, et al. Novel relationship between tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and antitubercular drug resistance. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2009;48(5):667-676. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19191655.
  203. Sonderup MW, Wainwright H, Hall P, Hairwadzi H, Spearman CW. A clinicopathological cohort study of liver pathology in 301 patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Hepatology. May 2015;61(5):1721-1729. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644940.
  204. Namale PE, Abdullahi LH, Fine S, Kamkuemah M, Wilkinson RJ, Meintjes G. Paradoxical TB-IRIS in HIV-infected adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Microbiol. 2015;10(6):1077-1099. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26059627.
  205. Narita M, Ashkin D, Hollender ES, Pitchenik AE. Paradoxical worsening of tuberculosis following antiretroviral therapy in patients with AIDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jul 1998;158(1):157-161. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9655723.
  206. Breen RA, Smith CJ, Bettinson H, et al. Paradoxical reactions during tuberculosis treatment in patients with and without HIV co-infection. Thorax. Aug 2004;59(8):704-707. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15282393.
  207. Breton G, Duval X, Estellat C, et al. Determinants of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV type 1-infected patients with tuberculosis after initiation of antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 1 2004;39(11):1709-1712. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15578375.
  208. Lawn SD, Myer L, Bekker LG, Wood R. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution disease: incidence, risk factors and impact in an antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa. AIDS. Jan 30 2007;21(3):335-341. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17255740.
  209. Manosuthi W, Kiertiburanakul S, Phoorisri T, Sungkanuparph S. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome of tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients receiving antituberculous and antiretroviral therapy. J Infect. Dec 2006;53(6):357-363. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16487593.
  210. Serra FC, Hadad D, Orofino RL, et al. Immune reconstitution syndrome in patients treated for HIV and tuberculosis in Rio de Janeiro. Braz J Infect Dis. Oct 2007;11(5):462-465. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17962870.
  211. Olalla J, Pulido F, Rubio R, et al. Paradoxical responses in a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients with mycobacterial disease. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Jan 2002;6(1):71-75. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11931404.
  212. Huyst V, Lynen L, Bottieau E, Zolfo M, Kestens L, Colebunders R. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in an HIV/TB co-infected patient four years after starting antiretroviral therapy. Acta Clin Belg. Mar-Apr 2007;62(2):126-129. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17547295.
  213. Michailidis C, Pozniak AL, Mandalia S, Basnayake S, Nelson MR, Gazzard BG. Clinical characteristics of IRIS syndrome in patients with HIV and tuberculosis. Antivir Ther. 2005;10(3):417-422. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15918332.
  214. Luetkemeyer AF, Kendall MA, Nyirenda M, et al. Tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in A5221 STRIDE: timing, severity, and implications for HIV-TB programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Apr 1 2014;65(4):423-428. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24226057.
  215. Narendran G, Andrade BB, Porter BO, et al. Paradoxical tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) in HIV patients with culture confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis in India and the potential role of IL-6 in prediction. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63541. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691062.
  216. Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Morroni C, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisone for paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. AIDS. Sep 24 2010;24(15):2381-2390. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20808204.
  217. Volkow PF, Cornejo P, Zinser JW, Ormsby CE, Reyes-Teran G. Life-threatening exacerbation of Kaposi's sarcoma after prednisone treatment for immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. AIDS. Mar 12 2008;22(5):663-665. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18317012.
  218. Brunel AS, Reynes J, Tuaillon E, et al. Thalidomide for steroid-dependent immune reconstitution inflammatory syndromes during AIDS. AIDS. Oct 23 2012;26(16):2110-2112. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22874513.
  219. Hsu DC, Faldetta KF, Pei L, et al. A Paradoxical Treatment for a Paradoxical Condition: Infliximab Use in Three Cases of Mycobacterial IRIS. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 22 2015. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26394669.
  220. Fourcade C, Mauboussin JM, Lechiche C, Lavigne JP, Sotto A. Thalidomide in the treatment of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV patients with neurological tuberculosis. AIDS Patient Care STDS. Nov 2014;28(11):567-569. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25285462.
  221. John L, Baalwa J, Kalimugogo P, et al. Response to 'Does immune reconstitution promote active tuberculosis in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy?' AIDS, 22 July 2005. AIDS. Nov 18 2005;19(17):2049-2050. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16260919.
  222. Goldsack NR, Allen S, Lipman MC. Adult respiratory distress syndrome as a severe immune reconstitution disease following the commencement of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Sex Transm Infect. Aug 2003;79(4):337-338. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12902592.
  223. Lawn SD, Wainwright H, Orrell C. Fatal unmasking tuberculosis immune reconstitution disease with bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia: the role of macrophages. AIDS. Jan 2 2009;23(1):143-145. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19050399.
  224. Chen WL, Lin YF, Tsai WC, Tsao YT. Unveiling tuberculous pyomyositis: an emerging role of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. Feb 2009;27(2):251 e251-252. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19371548.
  225. Korenromp EL, Scano F, Williams BG, Dye C, Nunn P. Effects of human immunodeficiency virus infection on recurrence of tuberculosis after rifampin-based treatment: an analytical review. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 1 2003;37(1):101-112. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12830415.
  226. Sonnenberg P, Murray J, Glynn JR, Shearer S, Kambashi B, Godfrey-Faussett P. HIV-1 and recurrence, relapse, and reinfection of tuberculosis after cure: a cohort study in South African mineworkers. Lancet. Nov 17 2001;358(9294):1687-1693. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11728545.
  227. Narayanan S, Swaminathan S, Supply P, et al. Impact of HIV infection on the recurrence of tuberculosis in South India. J Infect Dis. Mar 2010;201(5):691-703. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20121433.
  228. Jasmer RM, Bozeman L, Schwartzman K, et al. Recurrent tuberculosis in the United States and Canada: relapse or reinfection? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Dec 15 2004;170(12):1360-1366. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15477492.
  229. Fitzgerald DW, Desvarieux M, Severe P, Joseph P, Johnson WD, Jr., Pape JW. Effect of post-treatment isoniazid on prevention of recurrent tuberculosis in HIV-1-infected individuals: a randomised trial. Lancet. Oct 28 2000;356(9240):1470-1474. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11081529.
  230. Haller L, Sossouhounto R, Coulibaly IM, Dosso M, al e. Isoniazid plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine can reduce morbidity of HIV-positive patients treated for tuberculosis in Africa: a controlled clinical trial. Chemotherapy. 1999;45(6):452-465. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=10567776&query_hl=182&itool=pubmed_docsum.
  231. Mofenson LM, Rodriguez EM, Hershow R, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in pregnant and nonpregnant women infected with HIV in the Women and Infants Transmission Study. Arch Intern Med. May 22 1995;155(10):1066-1072. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7748050.
  232. Eriksen NL, Helfgott AW. Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6(1):13-17. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9678142.
  233. Jana N, Vasishta K, Jindal SK, Khunnu B, Ghosh K. Perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Feb 1994;44(2):119-124. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7911094.
  234. Jana N, Vasishta K, Saha SC, Ghosh K. Obstetrical outcomes among women with extrapulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. Aug 26 1999;341(9):645-649. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10460815.
  235. Jonnalagadda S, Lohman Payne B, Brown E, et al. Latent tuberculosis detection by interferon gamma release assay during pregnancy predicts active tuberculosis and mortality in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected women and their children. J Infect Dis. Dec 15 2010;202(12):1826-1835. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21067370.
  236. Jonnalagadda SR, Brown E, Lohman-Payne B, et al. Consistency of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific interferon-gamma responses in HIV-1-infected women during pregnancy and postpartum. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:950650. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22496602.
  237. Lighter-Fisher J, Surette AM. Performance of an interferon-gamma release assay to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2012;119(6):1088-1095. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22569120.
  238. Lawn SD, Wood R, De Cock KM, Kranzer K, Lewis JJ, Churchyard GJ. Antiretrovirals and isoniazid preventive therapy in the prevention of HIV-associated tuberculosis in settings with limited health-care resources. Lancet Infect Dis. Jul 2010;10(7):489-498. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20610331.
  239. Gupta A, Nayak U, Ram M, et al. Postpartum tuberculosis incidence and mortality among HIV-infected women and their infants in Pune, India, 2002-2005. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 15 2007;45(2):241-249. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17578786.
  240. Middelkoop K, Bekker LG, Myer L, et al. Antiretroviral program associated with reduction in untreated prevalent tuberculosis in a South African township. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Oct 15 2010;182(8):1080-1085. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20558626.
  241. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Guide for Primary Health Care Providers. 2013. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/ltbi/treatment.htm.
  242. Mnyani CN, McIntyre JA. Tuberculosis in pregnancy. BJOG. Jan 2011;118(2):226-231. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21083862.
  243. Brost BC, Newman RB. The maternal and fetal effects of tuberculosis therapy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. Sep 1997;24(3):659-673. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9266585.
  244. Bothamley G. Drug treatment for tuberculosis during pregnancy: safety considerations. Drug Saf. 2001;24(7):553-565. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11444726.
  245. Czeizel AE, Rockenbauer M, Olsen J, Sorensen HT. A population-based case-control study of the safety of oral anti-tuberculosis drug treatment during pregnancy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Jun 2001;5(6):564-568. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11409585.
  246. Efferen LS. Tuberculosis and pregnancy. Curr Opin Pulm Med. May 2007;13(3):205-211. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17414128.
  247. Vilarinho LC. Congenital tuberculosis: a case report. Braz J Infect Dis. Oct 2006;10(5):368-370. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17293929.
  248. Pillay T, Sturm AW, Khan M, et al. Vertical transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in KwaZulu Natal: impact of HIV-1 co-infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. Jan 2004;8(1):59-69. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14974747.
  249. Franks AL, Binkin NJ, Snider DE, Jr., Rokaw WM, Becker S. Isoniazid hepatitis among pregnant and postpartum Hispanic patients. Public Health Rep. Mar-Apr 1989;104(2):151-155. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2495549.
  250. World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis:guidelines for national programs. Paper presented at: WHO/TB/97.2201997; Geneva, Switzerland.
  251. Enarson D, Rieder H, Arnodottir T, Trebucq A. Management of tuberculosis: a guide for low income countries. 4th ed. Paris, France: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; 1996.
  252. Dluzniewski A, Gastol-Lewinska L. The search for teratogenic activity of some tuberlostatic drugs. Diss Pharm Pharmacol. 1971;23:383-392. 
  253. American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Treatment of Tuberculosis. MMWR. 2003;52(RR-11). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5211a1.htm.
  254. Shin S, Guerra D, Rich M, et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: a report of 7 cases. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 15 2003;36(8):996-1003. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12684912.
  255. Lessnau KD, Qarah S. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in pregnancy: case report and review of the literature. Chest. Mar 2003;123(3):953-956. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12628902.
  256. Drobac PC, del Castillo H, Sweetland A, et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: long-term follow-up of 6 children with intrauterine exposure to second-line agents. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1 2005;40(11):1689-1692. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15889370.
  257. Palacios E, Dallman R, Munoz M, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis and pregnancy: treatment outcomes of 38 cases in Lima, Peru. Clin Infect Dis. May 15 2009;48(10):1413-1419. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19361302.
  258. Schaefer C, Amoura-Elefant E, Vial T, et al. Pregnancy outcome after prenatal quinolone exposure. Evaluation of a case registry of the European Network of Teratology Information Services (ENTIS). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Nov 1996;69(2):83-89. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8902438.
  259. Loebstein R, Addis A, Ho E, et al. Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to fluoroquinolones: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jun 1998;42(6):1336-1339. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9624471.
  260. Nahum GG, Uhl K, Kennedy DL. Antibiotic use in pregnancy and lactation: what is and is not known about teratogenic and toxic risks. Obstet Gynecol. May 2006;107(5):1120-1138. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16648419.
  261. Varpela E. On the Effect Exerted by First-Line Tuberculosis Medicines on the Foetus. Acta Tuberc Pneumol Scand. 1964;45:53-69. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14209270.
  262. Fujimori H et al., The effect of tuberculostatics on the fetus: An experimental production of congenital anomaly in rats by ethionamide. Proc Congen Anom Res Assoc Jpn. 1965;5:34-35. 
  263. Takekoshi S. Effects of hydroxymethylpyrimidine on isoniazid- and ethionamide-induced teratosis. Gunma J Med Sci. 1965;14:233-244. 
  264. Khan I AA. Study of teratogenic activity of trifluoperazine, amitriptyline, ethionamide and thalidomide in pregnant rabbits and mice. Proc Eur Soc Study Drug Toxic. 1969;10:235-242. 
  265. Potworowska M S-EE, Szufladowica R. Treatment with ethionamide in pregnancy. Gruzlica. 1966;34:341-347. 

Download Guidelines