Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV
The information in the brief version is excerpted directly from the full-text guidelines. The brief version is a compilation of the tables and boxed recommendations.
Bacterial Enteric Infections
Last Updated: August 10, 2017; Last Reviewed: June 26, 2019
NOTE: Update in Progress
Rates of Gram-negative bacterial enteric infections are at least 10-fold higher among HIV-infected adults than in the general population, but these rates decline when patients are treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART).1-7 The risk of bacterial diarrhea varies according to CD4 T lymphocyte (CD4) count and is greatest in individuals with clinical AIDS or <200 CD4 cells/mm3.5 The bacteria most frequently isolated by culture from HIV-infected adults in the United States are Salmonella (particularly Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhimurium and Enteritidis), Shigella, and Campylobacter. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, particularly enteroaggregative E. coli, may contribute to the burden of diarrheal disease,8 but their role is poorly understood because diagnosis remains a research-only test. Clostridium difficile-associated infection (CDI) is common in HIV-infected patients; recent data9 suggest that low CD4 count (<50 cells/mm3) is an independent disease risk factor in addition to the traditional risk factors such as exposure to a health care facility or to antibiotics. Incidence of community-onset CDI is increasing and health care providers should also consider CDI in the evaluation of outpatient diarrheal illnesses in HIV-infected individuals. Data on Helicobacter pylori infection in HIV infection are limited and do not suggest excess risk in HIV-infected individuals. Other enteric infections that may cause diarrhea, such as Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and cytomegalovirus, are discussed elsewhere in these guidelines.
As with bacterial enteric infections in HIV-uninfected persons, the probable source for most enteric infections in HIV-infected patients is ingestion of contaminated food or water.3 Sexual activity with the potential for direct or indirect fecal-oral exposure also increases risk of infections, especially with Shigella10 and Campylobacter11 (see Appendix for further details). HIV-associated alterations in mucosal immunity or intestinal integrity and treatment with acid-suppressive agents may increase risk of enteric bacterial infections.
The three major clinical syndromes of infection with Gram-negative enteric bacteria among HIV-infected patients are:
- Self-limited gastroenteritis;
- More severe and prolonged diarrheal disease, potentially associated with fever, bloody diarrhea, and weight loss; and
- Bacteremia associated with extra-intestinal involvement, with or without concurrent or preceding gastrointestinal (GI) illness.12-15
Severe community-associated diarrhea is often defined as ≥6 loose stools (loose stool is defined as defecated material that takes the shape of a container) per day with or without other signs of disease such as fecal blood, orthostatic hypotension, or fever. In HIV-infected patients, the risk of more profound illness increases with the degree of immunosuppression.1,3,4,16 Relapses in infection with Salmonella and other Gram-negative bacterial enteric pathogens after appropriate treatment have been well documented in HIV-infected patients.17-19
Assessment of patients with diarrhea should include a complete exposure history (see below); a medication review, because diarrhea is a common side effect of some ART and antibiotics; quantification of the diarrheal illness by stool frequency, volume, duration, and presence of blood; and associated signs and symptoms, such as presence and duration of fever. Physical examination should include measurement of temperature and assessment of volume and nutritional status.
The diagnosis of Gram-negative bacterial enteric infection is established through cultures of stool and blood. Stool cultures are required to obtain antibiotic sensitivity testing for isolated enteric pathogens. Thus, stool cultures are preferred over or in addition to molecular diagnostics in HIV-infected patients given increasing resistance detected in enteric bacterial infections. Because incidence of bacteremia associated with Salmonella gastroenteritis is high in HIV-infected individuals, particularly those with advanced disease, blood cultures should be obtained from any patient with diarrhea and fever. For shigellosis, blood cultures may be helpful but are less likely to be positive than in salmonellosis.
Other infections for which HIV-infected patients are at risk, albeit at a lower rate, are non-jejuni non-coli Campylobacter species, such as Campylobacter fetus, Campylobacter upsaliensis, and Campylobacter lari, and the enterohepatic Helicobacter spp. (Helicobacter cineadi and Helicobacter fennelliae), which were originally described as Campylobacter spp. Blood culture systems will typically grow these bacteria, but they are unlikely to be identified on routine stool cultures performed by most laboratories because growing these fastidious organisms requires special stool culture conditions.
A stool sample for C. difficile toxin or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay should be routinely performed for patients with diarrhea who have recently received or are currently receiving antibiotics (including antimicrobial prophylaxis) or cancer chemotherapy, those who have been hospitalized in the past 4 to 6 weeks (or are currently hospitalized), those who reside in a long-term care facility, those with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3, those taking acid-suppressive medications, and those with moderate-to-severe community-acquired diarrhea.20 The most commonly used toxin tests are enzyme immunoassays that suffer from low sensitivity. PCR assays or glutamate dehydrogenase antigen enzyme immunoassays (which must be combined with a second confirmatory test for stool toxin) are recommended for testing.21 However, only diarrheal stool samples should be tested for C. difficile to limit detection of asymptomatic colonization. Regardless of the test used, the diagnosis of CDI can only be made through careful selection of the correct population for testing and a correlation of clinical and laboratory findings.
Endoscopy should generally be reserved for patients in whom stool culture, microscopy, C. difficile toxin assay, and blood culture fail to reveal an etiology or in whom treatment for an established diagnosis fails. Endoscopy with biopsy may be required for diagnosing etiologies other than bacterial enteric infections, including cryptosporidiosis, microsporidiosis, cytomegalovirus or MAC gastroenteritis, and noninfectious causes of GI symptoms.
Clinicians should remain alert to the possibility of sexually transmitted disease (STD). Some sexually transmitted rectal infections (e.g., proctitis due to lymphogranuloma venereum or Neisseria gonorrhoeae) can produce symptoms similar to those seen with colitis due to Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter spp. If stool cultures fail to yield enteric bacterial pathogens in patients with symptoms of proctitis or colitis, diagnostic evaluation for STDs with anoscopy, culture, and biopsy should be considered.
Multiple epidemiologic exposures can place patients at risk of enteric illnesses. The most common are ingestion of contaminated food or water and fecal-oral exposures (detailed prevention recommendations related to food and water exposures, pet exposures, and travel-related exposures can be found in the Appendix). Providing advice and education about such exposures is the responsibility of the health care provider. A patient’s clinical condition and CD4 count can help the provider determine what prevention recommendations are most appropriate. Patients with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3 or a history of AIDS-defining illness22 are at the greatest risk of enteric illnesses;5 however, excess risk of undetermined magnitude or duration may persist in those with lesser degrees of immune impairment, including individuals treated with ART.
Patients should be advised to regularly wash their hands with soap and water or alcohol-based cleansers to reduce the risk of enteric infection (AIII). With regard to preventing enteric infection, soap and water are preferred over alcohol-based cleansers, which do not kill C. difficile spores and are only partially active against norovirus and Cryptosporidium (AIII). HIV-infected patients should be advised to wash their hands after potential contact with human feces (e.g., as through defecation, cleaning feces from infants, or contact with a person who has diarrhea), after handling pets or other animals, after gardening or other contact with soil, before preparing food and eating, and before and after sex (AIII). HIV-infected patients should avoid unprotected sex practices, such as anal sex and oral-anal contact that could result in oral exposure to feces and, in addition to handwashing, they should be advised to use barriers such as dental dams during sex to reduce exposures when possible (AIII).
Antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent bacterial enteric illness is usually not recommended, including for travelers (AIII). Prophylactic antimicrobial treatment can elicit adverse reactions, promote the emergence of resistant organisms, and increase risk of CDI. In rare cases, however, antimicrobial prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones or rifaximin can be considered, such as for immunosuppressed travelers, depending on their level of immunosuppression, the region of travel, and the trip’s duration (CIII). For pregnant women and patients already taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (such as for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis), TMP-SMX may offer limited protection against travelers’ diarrhea as an alternative to fluoroquinolones or rifaximin (BIII). Risk of toxicity should be considered before prophylaxis with TMP-SMX is initiated solely because of travel.
In most situations, treatment of diarrheal disease in HIV-infected patients does not differ significantly from that in immunocompetent individuals. Decisions on therapy are based on an assessment of diarrhea severity and hydration status. Patients should be informed of the importance of maintaining hydration and be given oral or intravenous (IV) rehydration, if indicated (AIII). Because diarrheal disease can produce temporary malabsorption or lactose intolerance, consuming a bland diet and avoiding fat, dairy, and complex carbohydrates also are likely to be useful (BIII). The effectiveness and safety of probiotics or antimotility agents have not been adequately studied in HIV-infected patients with diarrheal illnesses.23 Antimotility agents should be avoided if there is concern about inflammatory diarrhea, including CDI (BIII).
After obtaining stool samples for diagnostic evaluation, initiation and duration of empiric antimicrobial therapy depend upon the patient’s CD4 count and clinical appearance. If stool samples are obtained, antibiotic susceptibility testing should be performed to confirm and inform antibiotic choice. No further work-up may be necessary and no treatment other than oral rehydration may be required, for example, in patients with CD4 counts >500 cells/mm3 who have had 1 to 2 days of loose stools without fever or blood. However, a short course of antibiotics may be indicated in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200 to 500 cells/mm3 who have diarrhea severe enough to compromise quality of life or ability to work. Patients with advanced HIV disease (i.e., CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3 or concomitant AIDS-defining illness) and clinically severe diarrhea (i.e., ≥6 liquid stools per day or bloody stools or a lower number of liquid stools per day but accompanied by fever or chills concerning for invasive bacterial disease) should undergo diagnostic evaluation to determine the etiology of the diarrheal illness and receive antimicrobial treatment. Empiric therapy with ciprofloxacin is reasonable (AIII). IV ceftriaxone or IV cefotaxime are reasonable alternatives (BIII). Therapy should be adjusted subsequently based on the results of the diagnostic work-up. Diarrhea that is persistent (i.e., lasting >14 days) in the absence of other clinical signs of severity, such as bloody stool or dehydration, should be evaluated and directed therapy should be started once a diagnosis is confirmed.
Diarrhea is one of the most common illnesses affecting international travelers. Antimicrobial resistance among enteric bacterial pathogens outside the United States is an important public health problem. For example, traveler’s diarrhea caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in Southeast Asia is common.24 Clinicians should consider the possibility of a resistant infection when prescribing empiric therapy for HIV-infected travelers who experience diarrhea or a syndrome consistent with a systemic infection while traveling or upon returning to the United States, given reports of multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae acquisition during travel.25-29
Immunocompetent hosts who are not HIV-infected often do not require treatment for Salmonella gastroenteritis, as the condition is usually self-limited and treatment may prolong the carrier state. In contrast, all HIV-infected patients with salmonellosis should be treated (AIII), although no clinical trials have compared antimicrobial therapy with placebo. Notably, HIV infection increases the risk of Salmonella bacteremia 20- to 100-fold and mortality as much as 7-fold compared with that in patients who are not HIV-infected.1,30
The initial treatment of choice for Salmonella infection is a fluoroquinolone (AIII). Ciprofloxacin is the preferred agent (AIII).31 Other fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, would likely be effective in treating salmonellosis in HIV-infected patients but they have not been well evaluated in clinical studies (BIII). Depending on antibiotic susceptibility, alternatives to the fluoroquinolones might include TMP-SMX or expanded-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone or cefotaxime (BIII).
The optimal duration of therapy for HIV-related Salmonella infection has not been defined. For patients with CD4 counts ≥200 cells/mm3 who have mild gastroenteritis without bacteremia, 7 to 14 days of treatment is reasonable. For the same patients with bacteremia, 14 days is appropriate, provided clearance of bacteremia is documented. Longer treatment is suggested if bacteremia persists or if the infection is complicated, that is, if metastatic foci are present (BIII). For patients with advanced HIV disease (CD4 count <200 cells/mm3), 2 to 6 weeks of antibiotics is often recommended (CIII).32 Some patients with Salmonella bacteremia may remain febrile for 5 to 7 days despite effective therapy.
HIV-infected patients with Salmonella bacteremia, which typically occurs in those with advanced HIV disease, should be monitored clinically for recurrence after treatment (BIII). Recurrence may present as bacteremia or as an anatomically localized infection, including intra-abdominal, endothelial, urinary tract, soft tissue, bone and joint, lung, or meningeal foci. Secondary prophylaxis should be considered for patients with recurrent Salmonella bacteremia (BIII) and it might also be considered for patients with recurrent gastroenteritis (with or without bacteremia) and in those with CD4 counts <200 cell/mm3 with severe diarrhea (BIII). The value of this secondary prophylaxis has not been established and must be weighed against the risks of long-term antibiotic exposure. Recurrent Salmonella bacteremia constitutes an AIDS-defining illness33 and suppression of HIV replication with ART appears to decrease the risk of recurrent illnesses.34 In patients whose Salmonella infection is resolved and who have responded to ART with sustained viral suppression and CD4 counts >200 cells/mm3, secondary prophylaxis for salmonellosis can probably be stopped (CII).7 Clinicians also should be aware that recurrence may represent development of antimicrobial resistance during therapy.
Therapy for Shigella infections is recommended both to shorten the duration of illness and to possibly prevent spread of the infection to others (AIII).31 The recommended treatment for shigellosis is with a fluoroquinolone, preferably ciprofloxacin, for 7 to 10 days (AIII). Although current CLSI criteria categorizes Shigella isolates with MIC 0.12-1 ug/ml as susceptible, these isolates may harbor plasmid-mediated resistance genes. Until the clinical significance of these findings can be determined, fluoroquinolones should only be used to treat isolates with MIC <0.12 ug/ml.35 Ciprofloxacin-resistant S. sonnei and S. flexneri have been reported in the United States and are associated with international travel, homelessness, and being a man who has sex with men (MSM); ciprofloxacin-resistant shigellosis among MSM appears to be acquired predominantly within the United States, rather than during travel.29 Depending on antibiotic susceptibilities, alternative agents might include TMP-SMX (7–10 days) or azithromycin (5 days) (BIII). Azithromycin has not been evaluated in HIV-infected patients with shigellosis, and the therapy suggested is extrapolated from limited data in immunocompetent hosts.36 Recently, azithromycin-resistant Shigella spp in HIV-infected MSM have been reported.37-39 Treatment for patients with Shigella bacteremia is less well defined, but extending treatment to at least 14 days is reasonable (BIII). Azithromycin is not recommended for treatment of Shigella spp. bacteremia (AIII). Chronic suppressive or maintenance therapy is not recommended for first-time Shigella infections (BIII). Recurrent infections can occur, particularly in individuals with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3, in which case extending antimicrobial therapy for up to 6 weeks is reasonable (BIII). As with Salmonella infections, suppression of HIV replication with ART is expected to decrease the risk of recurrent shigellosis.
The optimal treatment of Campylobacteriosis in HIV-infected patients is poorly defined. Culture and testing for the antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter isolates is recommended (BIII). Rates of resistance to antimicrobial agents differs by Campylobacter species. In the United States in 2013, 22% of C. jejuni isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolone and 2% were resistant to azithromycin; among C. coli isolates, 35% of isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones and 17% were resistant to azithromycin.40 For patients with mild disease and CD4 counts >200 cells/mm3, some clinicians opt to withhold therapy unless symptoms persist for more than several days (CIII). For mild-to-moderate Campylobacteriosis, initiating therapy with a fluoroquinolone such as ciprofloxacin for 7 to 10 days (if the organism is sensitive) or azithromycin for 5 days is a reasonable approach (BIII). Azithromycin has not been evaluated in HIV-infected patients with Campylobacteriosis and the therapy suggested is extrapolated from limited data in immunocompetent hosts.41 Patients with Campylobacter bacteremia should be treated for at least 14 days using a fluoroquinolone if the isolate is sensitive (BIII). Azithromycin is not recommended for treatment of Campylobacter bacteremia (AIII). Adding a second active agent, such as an aminoglycoside, may be prudent in these patients to limit the emergence of antibiotic resistance (BIII). Antibiotic choice should be guided by antibiotic susceptibility tests. Chronic suppressive or maintenance therapy is not recommended for first-time Campylobacter infections in HIV-infected patients (BIII). However, recurrent infections can occur, particularly in patients with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm3. In recurrent disease, extending the length of antimicrobial therapy for 2 to 6 weeks is reasonable (BIII). As with Salmonella infections, suppression of HIV replication with ART is expected to decrease the risk of recurrent Campylobacter spp. infections.
Available data suggest that HIV-infected patients respond to treatment of CDI similarly to HIV-uninfected patients. Guidelines and subsequent updates to guide the treatment of CDI have been published42-45 and can be consulted for further information. Multivariate analysis of 2 recent identical, multicenter (91 sites in United States, Canada; 109 sites in Europe), randomized, double-blind studies involving 537 non-HIV-infected patients with CDI (278 and 259 treated with metronidazole and vancomycin, respectively) found vancomycin to be superior to metronidazole for clinical success [OR 1.575 (1.035, 2.396), P = 0.034]. Stratification by CDI disease severity found 4.0% (mild), 8.3% (moderate), and 12.2% (severe) improved clinical success rates with vancomycin therapy compared to metronidazole therapy.46 Given this trial and earlier data,47 vancomycin (AI) is recommended for treatment of HIV-infected persons with CDI with the possible exception of mild CDI where treatment with metronidazole (CII) may yield clinical success. Treatment of recurrent CDI in HIV-infected patients is the same as in patients who are not HIV-infected. Limited case reports suggest that fecal microbiota therapy (aka fecal transplant) may be successful and safe to treat recurrent CDI in HIV-infected patients (CIII).48 The impact of ART on recurrence of CDI is unknown.
Special Considerations with Regard to Starting ART
ART initiation should follow standard guidelines. The presence of a diarrheal illness is relevant only in terms of a patient’s ability to ingest and absorb ART. If recurrent enteric infections are documented or Salmonella bacteremia occurs, prompt initiation of ART should be considered regardless of CD4 count; in other words, the presence of an enteric infection should not delay ART initiation (BIII).
Monitoring of Response to Therapy and Adverse Events (Including IRIS)
Patients should be monitored closely for response to treatment, defined clinically by improvement in systemic signs and symptoms, resolution of diarrhea, and sterilization of infected tissues or body fluids such as blood. A follow-up stool culture to demonstrate clearance of the organism is not required if clinical symptoms and diarrhea resolve. Follow-up stool culture may be required when public health considerations and state law dictate the need to ensure micro¬biologic cure, such as in health care or food service workers.
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome has not been described in association with treatment for bacterial enteric pathogens.
Managing Treatment Failure
Follow-up stool culture should be considered for patients who fail to respond clinically to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In patients with persistent or recurrent diarrhea despite therapy, clinicians should consider other enteric infections in the context of the patient’s immune status and, in all cases, the possibility of C. difficile or the development of antimicrobial resistance.
Observational studies suggest that plasma drug concentrations (e.g., of ciprofloxacin) in HIV-infected patients may be decreased as a result of diarrhea or malabsorption.49,50 Coadministration of quinolones with magnesium- or aluminum-containing antacids or with calcium, zinc, or iron should be avoided because these interfere with drug absorption. Although larger prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of severe diarrhea on antibiotic absorption, it is prudent to use IV antibiotics in clinically unstable patients (AIII).
The pharmacologic approach to recurrent enteric infections is covered in the section on directed therapy for each bacterial species. As noted above, secondary prophylaxis should be considered for patients with recurrent Salmonella bacteremia (BIII) and, in some circumstances, for those with recurrent shigellosis (BIII) or Campylobacteriosis (BIII).
Special Considerations During Pregnancy
The diagnosis of bacterial enteric infection in pregnant women is the same as in women who are not pregnant. Bacterial enteric infections in pregnant women should be managed the same as in women who are not pregnant, with several considerations. Based on the safety profile, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins or azithromycin should be the first-line therapy for bacterial enteric infections during pregnancy if antimicrobials are required, depending on the organism and the results of susceptibility testing (BIII).51 Arthropathy has been noted in the offspring of animals treated with quinolones during pregnancy. However, studies evaluating quinolone use in pregnant women did not find an increased risk of birth defects or musculoskeletal abnormalities.52-54 Thus, quinolones can be used in pregnancy for bacterial enteric infections in HIV-infected pregnant women if indicated by susceptibility testing or failure of first-line therapy, as listed above (BIII). TMP-SMX use in the first trimester should be avoided, if possible, because of an association with an increased risk of birth defects, specifically neural tube, cardiovascular, and urinary tract defects (BIII).55,56,57 However, a recent review of potential risks related to TMP-SMX use cites the low quality of current data and supports use of TMP-SMX in HIV-infected pregnant women as clinically indicated.58 Neonatal care providers should be informed if maternal sulfa therapy was used near delivery because of the theoretical increased risk of hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus in the newborn. Since rifaximin is not systemically absorbed, it can be used in pregnancy as in non-pregnant individuals. Limited data are available on the risks of vancomycin use during pregnancy, however minimal absorption is expected with oral therapy. With intravenous use, vancomycin readily crosses the placenta.59 A study of 10 infants evaluated after second or third trimester in utero exposure from maternal intravenous vancomycin therapy for serious staphylococcal infections found no hearing loss or renal toxicity attributed to vancomycin.60 A recent review of metronidazole use in pregnancy for treatment of trichomoniasis or bacterial vaginosis found no increase in risk of birth defects.61 Studies on use for CDI in pregnancy were not found.
|Preventing Bacterial Enteric Illness
|General Considerations when Managing Patients with Bacterial Enteric Infections
Empiric Treatment of Bacterial Enteric Infections (Pending Diagnostic Studies)
Note: IV antibiotic therapy with hospitalization should be considered in patients with marked nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, electrolyte abnormalities, acidosis, blood pressure instability, and/or when clinical judgment indicates severity of disease.
For patients with persistent diarrhea (>14 days) but no other severe clinical signs (e.g., dehydration, blood in stool), antibiotic therapy can be withheld until a diagnosis is confirmed.
Diarrhea is a common illness of international travelers. Antimicrobial resistance among enteric bacterial pathogens outside the United States is common. Clinicians should consider the possibility of resistant infections when prescribing empiric antibiotic therapy for HIV-infected travelers while traveling or upon return to the United States, particularly among travelers to South and Southeast Asia.
All HIV-infected patients with salmonellosis should receive antibiotic treatment due to the increased risk of bacteremia (by 20 to 100-fold) and mortality (by as much as 7-fold) compared with HIV-negative individuals (AIII).
If susceptible, alternatives to fluoroquinolone may include 1 of the following:
Duration of Therapy for Gastroenteritis Without Bacteremia
Duration of Therapy for Gastroenteritis With Bacteremia
The role of long-term, secondary prophylaxis for patients with recurrent bacteremia or gastroenteritis is not well established. Clinicians must weigh the benefit against the risks of long-term antibiotic exposure (BIII). Antibiotic choices for secondary prophylaxis are the same as for primary treatment and are dependent on the sensitivity of the Salmonella isolate.
When to Stop Secondary Prophylaxis:
Alternative Therapy (Depending on Susceptibility Results):
Duration of Therapy:
Chronic Maintenance or Suppressive Therapy:
Mild Disease if CD4 Count >500 cells/mm3:
Mild to Moderate Disease
Alternative Therapy (Depending on Susceptibility Results):
Duration of Therapy:
Chronic Maintenance or Suppressive Therapy:
Treating Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI)
Alternative Therapy for Mild CDI:
Key to Acronyms: CD4 = CD4 T lymphocyte cell; IV = intravenously; PO = orally; q(n)h = every “n” hours.
- Celum CL, Chaisson RE, Rutherford GW, Barnhart JL, Echenberg DF. Incidence of salmonellosis in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis. Dec 1987;156(6):998-1002. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3680999.
- Sorvillo FJ, Lieb LE, Waterman SH. Incidence of campylobacteriosis among patients with AIDS in Los Angeles County. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1991;4(6):598-602. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2023099.
- Angulo FJ, Swerdlow DL. Bacterial enteric infections in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. Aug 1995;21 Suppl 1:S84-93. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8547518.
- Nelson MR, Shanson DC, Hawkins DA, Gazzard BG. Salmonella, Campylobacter and Shigella in HIV-seropositive patients. AIDS. Dec 1992;6(12):1495-1498. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1362879.
- Sanchez TH, Brooks JT, Sullivan PS, et al. Bacterial diarrhea in persons with HIV infection, United States, 1992-2002. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 1 2005;41(11):1621-1627. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16267735.
- Wilcox CM, Saag MS. Gastrointestinal complications of HIV infection: changing priorities in the HAART era. Gut. Jun 2008;57(6):861-870. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18203808.
- Hung CC, Hung MN, Hsueh PR, et al. Risk of recurrent nontyphoid Salmonella bacteremia in HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy and an increasing trend of fluoroquinolone resistance. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1 2007;45(5):e60-67. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17682981.
- Huang DB, Mohanty A, DuPont HL, Okhuysen PC, Chiang T. A review of an emerging enteric pathogen: enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. Oct 2006;55(Pt 10):1303-1311. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17005776.
- Haines CF, Moore RD, Bartlett JG, et al. Clostridium difficile in a HIV-infected cohort: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. AIDS. Nov 13 2013;27(17):2799-2807. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23842125.
- Aragon TJ, Vugia DJ, Shallow S, et al. Case-control study of shigellosis in San Francisco: the role of sexual transmission and HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2007;44(3):327-334. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17205436.
- Quinn TC, Goodell SE, Fennell C, et al. Infections with Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter-like organisms in homosexual men. Ann Intern Med. Aug 1984;101(2):187-192. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6547580.
- Snijders F, Kuijper EJ, de Wever B, van der Hoek L, Danner SA, Dankert J. Prevalence of Campylobacter-associated diarrhea among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1997;24(6):1107-1113. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9195065.
- Tee W, Mijch A. Campylobacter jejuni bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and non-HIV-infected patients: comparison of clinical features and review. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 1998;26(1):91-96. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9455515.
- Tee W, Mijch A, Wright E, Yung A. Emergence of multidrug resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolates from three patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1995;21(3):634-638. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8527556.
- Meier PA, Dooley DP, Jorgensen JH, Sanders CC, Huang WM, Patterson JE. Development of quinolone-resistant Campylobacter fetus bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Infect Dis. Apr 1998;177(4):951-954. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9534967.
- Casado JL, Valdezate S, Calderon C, et al. Zidovudine therapy protects against Salmonella bacteremia recurrence in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Infect Dis. Jun 1999;179(6):1553-1556. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10228081.
- Kristjansson M, Viner B, Maslow JN. Polymicrobial and recurrent bacteremia with Shigella in a patient with AIDS. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(4):411-416. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7984973.
- Mayer KH, Hanson E. Recurrent salmonella infection with a single strain in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Confirmation by plasmid fingerprinting. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. Jan 1986;4(1):71-76. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3510806.
- Rubino S, Spanu L, Mannazzu M, et al. Molecular typing of non-typhoid Salmonella strains isolated from HIV-infected patients with recurrent salmonellosis. AIDS. Jan 14 1999;13(1):137-139. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10207558.
- Pulvirenti JJ, Mehra T, Hafiz I, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection and diarrhea in HIV infected inpatients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. Dec 2002;44(4):325-330. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12543536.
- Brecher SM, Novak-Weekley SM, Nagy E. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: there is light at the end of the colon. Clin Infect Dis. Oct 2013;57(8):1175-1181. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23788237.
- Schneider E, Whitmore S, Glynn KM, et al. Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection among adults, adolescents, and children aged <18 months and for HIV infection and AIDS among children aged 18 months to <13 years--United States, 2008. MMWR Recomm Rep. Dec 5 2008;57(RR-10):1-12. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19052530.
- Nwachukwu CE, Okebe JU. Antimotility agents for chronic diarrhoea in people with HIV/AIDS. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(4):CD005644. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18843696.
- Tribble DR, Sanders JW, Pang LW, et al. Traveler's diarrhea in Thailand: randomized, double-blind trial comparing single-dose and 3-day azithromycin-based regimens with a 3-day levofloxacin regimen. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2007;44(3):338-346. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17205438.
- Lubbert C, Straube L, Stein C, et al. Colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in international travelers returning to Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. Jan 2015;305(1):148-156. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25547265.
- Kantele A, Laaveri T, Mero S, et al. Antimicrobials increase travelers' risk of colonization by extended-spectrum betalactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 15 2015;60(6):837-846. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25613287.
- Johnning A, Kristiansson E, Angelin M, et al. Quinolone resistance mutations in the faecal microbiota of Swedish travellers to India. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:235. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498929.
- Barlow RS, Debess EE, Winthrop KL, Lapidus JA, Vega R, Cieslak PR. Travel-associated antimicrobial drug-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonellae, 2004-2009. Emerg Infect Dis. Apr 2014;20(4):603-611. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655581.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Importation and Domestic Transmission of Shigella sonnei Resistant to Ciprofloxacin — United States, May 2014–February 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(12):318-320. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6412a2.htm?s_cid=mm6412a2_w.
- Cummings PL, Sorvillo F, Kuo T. Salmonellosis-related mortality in the United States, 1990-2006. Foodborne Pathog Dis. Nov 2010;7(11):1393-1399. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20617938.
- Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2001;32(3):331-351. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11170940.
- Gordon MA, Banda HT, Gondwe M, et al. Non-typhoidal salmonella bacteraemia among HIV-infected Malawian adults: high mortality and frequent recrudescence. AIDS. Aug 16 2002;16(12):1633-1641. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12172085.
- 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Recomm Rep. Dec 18 1992;41(RR-17):1-19. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1361652.
- Chou YJ, Lin HW, Yang CJ, et al. Risk of recurrent nontyphoid Salmonella bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with short-term secondary prophylaxis in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. Jul 31 2015. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26316009.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). CDC Recommendations for Diagnosing and Managing Shigella Strains with Possible Reduced Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin. Available at: https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/han00401.asp. Accessed [5/4/2017]
- Khan WA, Seas C, Dhar U, Salam MA, Bennish ML. Treatment of shigellosis: V. Comparison of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. May 1 1997;126(9):697-703. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9139555.
- Heiman KE, Karlsson M, Grass J, et al. Notes from the field: Shigella with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin among men who have sex with men - United States, 2002-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Feb 14 2014;63(6):132-133. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24522098.
- Hassing RJ, Melles DC, Goessens WH, Rijnders BJ. Case of Shigella flexneri infection with treatment failure due to azithromycin resistance in an HIV-positive patient. Infection. Feb 2 2014. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24488332.
- Baker KS, Dallman TJ, Ashton PM, et al. Intercontinental dissemination of azithromycin-resistant shigellosis through sexual transmission: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. Aug 2015;15(8):913-921. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25936611.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013 Human Isolates Final Report. 2015. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/narms/pdf/2013-annual-report-narms-508c.pdf.
- Kuschner RA, Trofa AF, Thomas RJ, et al. Use of azithromycin for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis in travelers to Thailand, an area where ciprofloxacin resistance is prevalent. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1995;21(3):536-541. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8527539.
- Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. May 2010;31(5):431-455. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20307191.
- Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. Apr 2013;108(4):478-498; quiz 499. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23439232.
- Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. Jan 27 2015;313(4):398-408. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25626036.
- Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. Apr 16 2015;372(16):1539-1548. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875259.
- Johnson S, Louie TJ, Gerding DN, et al. Vancomycin, metronidazole, or tolevamer for Clostridium difficile infection: results from two multinational, randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. Aug 2014;59(3):345-354. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799326.
- Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. Aug 1 2007;45(3):302-307. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17599306.
- Di Bella S, Gouliouris T, Petrosillo N. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for Clostridium difficile infection: Focus on immunocompromised patients. J Infect Chemother. Apr 2015;21(4):230-237. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25703532.
- Gurumurthy P, Ramachandran G, Hemanth Kumar AK, et al. Malabsorption of rifampin and isoniazid in HIV-infected patients with and without tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 15 2004;38(2):280-283. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14699462.
- Peloquin CA, MacPhee AA, Berning SE. Malabsorption of antimycobacterial medications. N Engl J Med. Oct 7 1993;329(15):1122-1123. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8371737.
- Bérard A, Sheehy O, Zhao J, Nordeng H. Use of macrolides during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects: a population-based study. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2015;24(12):1241-1248. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26513406.
- Padberg S, Wacker E, Meister R, et al. Observational cohort study of pregnancy outcome after first-trimester exposure to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Aug 2014;58(8):4392-4398. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24841264.
- Schaefer C, Amoura-Elefant E, Vial T, et al. Pregnancy outcome after prenatal quinolone exposure. Evaluation of a case registry of the European Network of Teratology Information Services (ENTIS). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Nov 1996;69(2):83-89. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8902438.
- Loebstein R, Addis A, Ho E, et al. Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to fluoroquinolones: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jun 1998;42(6):1336-1339. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9624471.
- Czeizel AE, Rockenbauer M, Sorensen HT, Olsen J. The teratogenic risk of trimethoprim-sulfonamides: a population based case-control study. Reprod Toxicol. Nov-Dec 2001;15(6):637-646. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11738517.
- Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, Mitchell AA. Folic acid antagonists during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. Nov 30 2000;343(22):1608-1614. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11096168.
- Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, Mitchell AA. Neural tube defects in relation to use of folic acid antagonists during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. May 15 2001;153(10):961-968. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11384952.
- Ford N, Shubber Z, Jao J, Abrams EJ, Frigati L, Mofenson L. Safety of cotrimoxazole in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Aug 15 2014;66(5):512-521. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853309.
- Bourget P, Fernandez H, Delouis C, Ribou F. Transplacental passage of vancomycin during the second trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1991;78(5 Pt 2):908-911. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1923224.
- Reyes MP, Ostrea EM, Jr., Cabinian AE, Schmitt C, Rintelmann W. Vancomycin during pregnancy: does it cause hearing loss or nephrotoxicity in the infant? Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1989;161(4):977-981. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2801848.
- Sheehy O, Santos F, Ferreira E, Berard A. The use of metronidazole during pregnancy: a review of evidence. Curr Drug Saf. 2015;10(2):170-179. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986038.
- CDC | 2015 STD Treatment Guidelines
- HCV Guidance: Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C
- AIDSinfo Patient Materials: What is an Opportunistic Infection?
- AIDSource | HIV-Related Conditions
- AETC National HIV Curriculum
- How to Cite These Guidelines
- Adult and Adolescent OI Guidelines Archive