Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Exposed and HIV-Infected Children
The information in the brief version is excerpted directly from the full-text guidelines. The brief version is a compilation of the tables and boxed recommendations.
Last Updated: April 2, 2014; Last Reviewed: November 6, 2013
|Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional
Rating of Evidence: I = One or more randomized trials in children† with clinical outcomes and/or validated endpoints; I* = One or more randomized trials in adults with clinical outcomes and/or validated laboratory endpoints with accompanying data in children† from one or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; II = One or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies in children† with long-term outcomes; II* = One or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational studies in adults with long-term clinical outcomes with accompanying data in children† from one or more similar nonrandomized trials or cohort studies with clinical outcome data; III = Expert opinion
†Studies that include children or children/adolescents, but not studies limited to post-pubertal adolescents
EpidemiologyThe most common fungal infections in HIV-infected children are caused by Candida spp. Localized disease caused by Candida is characterized by limited tissue invasion to the skin or mucosa. Examples of localized candidiasis include oropharyngeal and esophageal disease, vulvovaginitis, and diaper dermatitis. Once the organism penetrates the mucosal surface and widespread hematogenous dissemination occurs, invasive candidiasis ensues. This can result in candidemia, meningitis, endocarditis, renal disease, endophthalmitis, and hepatosplenic disease.
Oral thrush and diaper dermatitis occur in 50% to 85% of HIV-infected children. Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) continues to be one of the most frequent opportunistic infections in HIV-infected children during the combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) era (28% of children), with an incidence rate of 0.93 per 100 child-years.1 The incidence of esophageal or tracheobronchial candidiasis has decreased from 1.2 per 100 child-years before the pre-cART era to 0.08 per 100 child-years during the cART era (2001–2004).2 However, Candida esophagitis continues to be seen in children who are not responding to antiretroviral therapy.3,4 Children who develop esophageal candidiasis despite cART may be less likely to have typical symptoms (e.g., odynophagia, retrosternal pain) or have concomitant OPC;5 during the pre-cART era, concomitant OPC occurred in 94% of children with Candida esophagitis.3 Risk factors for esophageal candidiasis include low CD4 T lymphocyte (CD4) cell count (<100 cells/mm3), high viral load, and neutropenia (<500 cells/mm3).1-4
Disseminated candidiasis is infrequent in HIV-infected children, but Candida can disseminate from the esophagus particularly when coinfection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) is present.3,6 Candidemia occurs in up to 12% of HIV-infected children with chronically indwelling central venous catheters for total parental nutrition or intravenous (IV) antibiotics.4,7 Candida albicans is the most common cause of mucosal, esophageal, and invasive candidiasis, but approximately 50% of reported cases of Candida bloodstream infections in HIV-infected children are caused by non-albicans Candida spp., including Candida tropicalis, Candida pseudotropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, and Candida dubliniensis. The non-albicans Candida species are important to recognize because several are resistant to fluconazole and other antifungals. In one study of Cambodian HIV-infected children on cART who had candidiasis, seven (75%) of nine isolated C. glabrata were resistant to fluconazole, and three (40%) of seven C. parapsilosis isolated were resistant to more than three azole agents.8 Species-specific epidemiology also varies widely by geographic location and hospital. Many children who develop candidemia have received systemically absorbed oral antifungal azole compounds (e.g., ketoconazole, fluconazole) for control of oral and esophageal candidiasis, which may predispose to resistant isolates.4
Clinical ManifestationsClinical manifestations of OPC vary and include pseudomembranous (thrush) and erythematous (atrophic), hyperplastic (hypertrophic), and angular cheilitis. Thrush appears as creamy white, curd-like patches with inflamed underlying mucosa that is exposed after removal of the exudate. It can be found on the oropharyngeal mucosa, palate, and tonsils. Erythematous OPC is characterized by flat erythematous lesions on the mucosal surface. Hyperplastic candidiasis comprises raised white plaques on the lower surface of the tongue, palate, and buccal mucosa and cannot be removed. Angular cheilitis occurs as red fissured lesions in the corners of the mouth.
Esophageal candidiasis often presents with odynophagia, dysphagia, or retrosternal pain, and unlike adults, many children experience nausea and vomiting. Therefore, children with esophageal candidiasis may present with dehydration and weight loss. Evidence of OPC can be absent in children with esophageal candidiasis, particularly those receiving cART.
New-onset fever in an HIV-infected child with advanced disease and a central venous catheter is the most common clinical manifestation of candidemia. Renal candidiasis presents with candiduria and ultrasonographically demonstrated renal parenchymal lesions, often without symptoms related to renal disease.4
DiagnosisOral candidiasis can be diagnosed with a potassium hydroxide preparation and culture with microscopic demonstration of budding yeast cells in wet mounts or biopsy specimens. Esophageal candidiasis has a classic cobblestoning appearance on barium swallow. Findings on endoscopy may range from few, small, white, raised plaques to elevated confluent plaques with hyperemia and extensive ulceration. Endoscopy is also helpful for ruling out other causes of refractory esophagitis, such as HSV, CMV, and Mycobacterium avium complex.
Candidemia is best diagnosed with blood cultures using lysis-centrifugation techniques4 or automated broth-based systems.9 When candidemia is present, retinal examination for endophthalmitis, cardiac echocardiogram for endocarditis, abdominal computed tomography or ultrasound for hepatic or renal involvement, and bone scans for osteomyelitis (if suspected by symptoms) should be considered.
New diagnostic techniques such as the urine D-arabinitol/L-arabinitol ratio,10,11 serum D-arabinitol/creatinine ratio,12,13 Candida antigen mannan,14,15 (1,3)-beta-D-gulcan assay,16,17 and real-time polymerase chain reaction18,19 are promising diagnostic alternatives under development for early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Although several of these assays are helpful in diagnosing adult patients, none of them have been validated for use in children.
Preventing ExposureCandida organisms are common commensals on mucosal surfaces in healthy individuals, and no measures are available to reduce exposure to these fungi except reducing exposure to unneeded antibiotic exposure that may predispose to Candida colonization.
Preventing First Episode of DiseaseRoutine primary prophylaxis of candidiasis in HIV-infected infants and children is not indicated, given the low prevalence of serious Candida infections (e.g., esophageal, tracheobronchial, disseminated) during the cART era and the availability of effective treatment. Concerns exist about the potential for resistant Candida strains, drug interactions between antifungal and antiretroviral (ARV) agents, and lack of randomized controlled trials in children.20
Discontinuing Primary ProphylaxisNot applicable.
Oropharyngeal CandidiasisEarly, uncomplicated infection can be effectively treated with topical therapy using clotrimazole troches or oral nystatin suspension for 7 to 14 days (BII).21-24 Debridement can be considered as adjunctive therapy in OPC. Resistance to clotrimazole can develop as a consequence of previous exposure to clotrimazole itself or to other azole drugs; resistance correlates with refractory mucosal candidiasis.25
Systemic therapy with 1 of the oral azoles (e.g., fluconazole, itraconazole) for 7 to 14 days is recommended for moderate to severe OPC.21-23 Oral fluconazole is more effective than nystatin suspension for initial treatment of OPC in infants, easier to administer to children than the topical therapies, and the recommended treatment if systemic therapy is used (AI*).22,26
For fluconazole-refractory OPC, itraconazole oral solution should be used. Itraconazole solution has efficacy comparable to fluconazole and can be used to treat OPC, although it is less well tolerated than fluconazole (AI).27 Gastric acid enhances absorption of itraconazole solution; itraconazole solution should be taken without food when possible. Itraconazole capsules and oral solution should not be used interchangeably because, at the same dose, drug exposure is greater with the oral solution than with capsules and absorption of the capsule formulation varies. Ketoconazole absorption also varies, and therefore neither itraconazole capsules nor ketoconazole are recommended for treating OPC if fluconazole or itraconazole solutions are available (BII*). Additional choices for fluconazole-refractory OPC include voriconazole or posaconazole or IV treatment with amphotericin B or an echinocandin (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin) if required. Chronic suppressive therapy is usually unnecessary for HIV-infected patients (AI*).
Esophageal DiseaseSystemic therapy is essential for esophageal disease (AI*) and should be initiated empirically in HIV-infected children who have OPC and esophageal symptoms. In most patients, symptoms should resolve within days after the start of effective therapy. Oral fluconazole for 14 to 21 days is recommended highly effective for treatment of Candida esophagitis (AI*).21,28 IV fluconazole, amphotericin B, or an echinocandin should be used for patients who cannot tolerate oral therapy. For fluconazole-refractory disease, itraconazole solution, voriconazole, amphotericin B, or an echinocandin are alternatives. Suppressive therapy with fluconazole three times weekly is recommended for recurrent infections.
Invasive DiseaseCentral venous catheters should always be removed when feasible in HIV-infected children with candidemia (AI).4,29 Among children with persistent candidemia despite appropriate therapy, investigation for a deep tissue focus of infection, such as with echocardiogram, renal or abdominal ultrasound, should be conducted. The treatment of choice for invasive disease in HIV-infected children depends on severity of disease, previous azole exposure, and Candida isolate obtained (if known). An echinocandin is recommended for most severely ill children with candidiasis because of the fungicidal nature of these agents as well as the lack of adverse events (AI*). Fluconazole is a reasonable alternative for patients who are less critically ill and who have no recent fluconazole exposure. Voriconazole can be used in situations in which mold coverage is also warranted. For infections with C. glabrata, an echinocandin is recommended because of the increasing resistance seen against fluconazole for this species (AII). However, for patients already receiving fluconazole or voriconazole who are clinically improving despite C. glabrata infection, continuing use of the azole is reasonable. In addition, infection with C. krusei should be treated with an echinocandin because of the inherent resistance to fluconazole. Amphotericin B is an effective but less attractive alternative (BII). Amphotericin B lipid formulations have a role in children who are intolerant of conventional amphotericin B (deoxycholate), have disseminated candidal infection that is refractory to conventional amphotericin B, or are at high risk of nephrotoxicity because of preexisting renal disease or use of other nephrotoxic drugs (BII). For infection with C. parapsilosis, fluconazole or amphotericin B is recommended (AII) because of data showing a decreased response from this species to the echinocandins.30 However, if a patient is receiving empiric therapy with an echinocandin and showing clinical improvement when culture of C. parapsilosis returns, continuing with this therapy is reasonable. Recommended duration of therapy for candidemia is 14 days after documented clearance from the blood and resolution of neutropenia and of clinical signs and symptoms of candidemia.
Conventional amphotericin B (sodium deoxycholate complex) pharmacokinetics (PK) in children are very similar to adults. In children who have azotemia or hyperkalemia or who are receiving high doses (≥1 mg/kg), a longer infusion time of 3 to 6 hours is recommended (BIII).31 In children with life-threatening disease, the target daily dose of amphotericin B should be administered from the beginning of therapy (BIII). Flucytosine has been used in combination with amphotericin B in some children with severe invasive candidiasis, particularly in those with central nervous system disease (CIII), but it has a narrow therapeutic index and should no longer be used for this purpose.
Fluconazole PK vary significantly with age, and fluconazole is rapidly cleared in children. Daily fluconazole dose needs to be 6 to 12 mg/kg daily for children, and treatment of invasive candidiasis requires higher doses of fluconazole than are used for mucocutaneous disease. Alternatively, an initial course of amphotericin B can be administered and then carefully followed by completion of a course of fluconazole therapy (BIII). Species identification is necessary when using fluconazole because of intrinsic drug resistance among certain Candida spp. (e.g., C. krusei, C. glabrata). Because of more rapid clearance in children, fluconazole administered to children at 12 mg/kg/day provides exposure similar to standard 400-mg daily dosing in adults. Dosing of fluconazole for invasive candidiasis in children and adolescents should generally not exceed 600 mg/day.32
Itraconazole oral solution provides levels lower than those seen in adults; therefore, dosing should be 2.5 mg/kg per dose twice daily (BII*).
Experience with voriconazole in children is growing, both in dosing and efficacy, including esophageal candidiasis or candidemia.3,21,33,34
Usually children are started on voriconazole IV and then switched to oral administration to complete therapy after stabilization. The optimal pediatric dose of voriconazole is higher than used in adults due to differing PK. Voriconazole has been shown to be tolerated to a similar degree regardless of dosage and age; a dosage approaching 8 mg/kg in children aged 2 to 11 years was needed to attain voriconazole plasma levels achieved in adults with a 4-mg/kg IV dosage. Also, the oral bioavailability of voriconazole in children compared to adults is lower, therefore there is a need for higher weight-adjusted oral dosages than dosages used for IV therapy.33,34 The recommended voriconazole dosage for children is 9 mg/kg every 12 hours IV loading on day 1, followed by 8 mg/kg IV every 12 hours. Conversion to oral voriconazole should be at 9 mg/kg orally every 12 hours (BII).35 In addition, therapeutic voriconazole drug levels should be monitored because of significant interpatient variation in PK of voriconazole in children with invasive fungal infection.36 For example, voriconazole clearance depends on allelic polymporphisms of CYP2C19, resulting in poor and extensive metabolizers of voriconazole.37,38 For example, it is estimated that 15% to 20% of Asian compared with 3% to 5% of Caucasian and African populations are poor metabolizers, further underscoring the importance of monitoring voriconazole levels to ensure proper dosing.37
Data from studies using echinocandins including caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin are now sufficient to recommend these agents as alternatives to fluconazole for esophageal candidiasis and as first-line therapy for disseminated candidiasis (AII).39-53 Caspofungin was effective in treating candidemia, renal candidiasis, and endocardial infection in 10 infants, including 1 term and 9 premature infant(s) who were unresponsive to or intolerant of deoxycholate amphotericin B.40 A PK study of caspofungin in immunocompromised HIV-uninfected children aged 2 to 17 years demonstrated that 50 mg/m2 body surface area/day (70 mg/day maximum) provides comparable exposure to that obtained in adults receiving a standard 50-mg daily regimen.41 A retrospective report in which caspofungin was administered to 20 children aged ≤16 years who had invasive fungal infections (seven had invasive candidiasis) but not HIV infection, found the drug to be efficacious and well tolerated.42 In a prospective open-label study of children aged 6 months to 17 years, primary or salvage treatment with caspofungin was well tolerated and successful in 81% of Candida infections, including 30 of 37 patients with invasive candidiasis, and 1 of 1 patient with esophageal candidiasis.43 The first pediatric double-blind, randomized controlled trial of empiric antifungal therapy comparing liposomal amphotericin B with caspofungin in children aged 2 to 12 years with cancer, neutropenia, and persistent fever, found comparable efficacy between the 2 treatment arms.44
Micafungin has been studied in children treated with 2 to 4 mg/kg daily, but neonates require doses as high as 10 to 12 mg/kg daily (AII).45-49 Micafungin demonstrates dose-proportional PK and an inverse relationship between age and clearance, suggesting a need for increased dosage in young children.50 Clearance of the drug in neonates was more than double that in older children and adults.51 Dosages of 10 to 15 mg/kg/day have been studied in premature neonates, resulting in area-under-the-curve values consistent with an adult dosage of 100 to 150 mg/day. In a clinical trial comparing micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B(L-AmB) using an intent-to-treat analysis of children and adults with candidiasis/candidemia and with or without cancer, 42 children with or without neutropenia (13 with malignancies/29 without malignancies) received 2 mg/kg/day of micafungin and 3 mg/kg/day of L-AmB. Micafungin was as effective as L-AmB in treating candidiasis/candidemia and well tolerated in these patients.49
One PK study of anidulafungin in 25 HIV-uninfected neutropenic children aged 2 to 17 years, including 12 aged 2 to 11 years and 13 aged 12 to 17 years, showed drug concentrations at 0.75 mg/kg per dose and 1.5 mg/kg per dose were similar to drug concentrations in adults with 50 mg per dose and 100 mg per dose, respectively.52 In a case report of a term 11-day infant with peritoneal candidiasis and failure of L-AmB therapy, an IV dose of 1.5 mg/kg/day of anidulafungin was successful in treating the infection.53
Data in adults are limited on use of combination antifungal therapy for invasive candidal infections; combination amphotericin B and fluconazole resulted in more rapid clearance of Candida from the bloodstream but no difference in mortality.21 Data are insufficient to support routine use of combination therapy in children with invasive candidiasis (BIII).54
Monitoring and Adverse Events, Including IRISNo adverse effects have been reported with use of oral nystatin for treatment of oral candidiasis, but bitter taste may contribute to poor adherence.
The azole drugs have relatively low rates of toxicity, but because of their ability to inhibit the cytochrome P450 (CYP450)-dependent hepatic enzymes (ketoconazole has the strongest inhibitory effect) and their metabolism by these enzymes, they can interact substantially with other drugs undergoing hepatic metabolism. These interactions can result in decreased plasma concentration of the azole because of increased metabolism induced by the co-administered drug or development of unexpected toxicity from the co-administered drug because of increased plasma concentrations secondary to azole-induced alterations in hepatic metabolism. The potential for drug interactions, particularly with ARV drugs such as protease inhibitors, should be carefully evaluated before initiation of therapy (AIII).
The most frequent adverse effects of the azole drugs are gastrointestinal, including nausea and vomiting (10%–40% of patients). Skin rash and pruritus can occur with all azoles; rare cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and alopecia have been reported with fluconazole therapy. All drugs are associated with asymptomatic increases in transaminases (1%–13% of patients). Hematologic abnormalities have been reported with itraconazole, including thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Of the azoles, ketoconazole is associated with the highest frequency of side effects. Its use has been associated with endocrinologic abnormalities related to steroid metabolism, including adrenal insufficiency and gynecomastia, hemolytic anemia, and transaminitis. Dose-related, reversible visual changes such as photophobia and blurry vision have been reported in approximately 30% of patients receiving voriconazole.55 Cardiac arrhythmias and renal abnormalities including nephritis and acute tubular necrosis also have been reported with voriconazole use.
Amphotericin B deoxycholate undergoes renal excretion as inactive drug. Adverse effects of amphotericin B are primarily nephrotoxicity, defined by substantial azotemia from glomerular damage, and can be accompanied by hypokalemia from tubular damage. Nephrotoxicity is exacerbated by use of concomitant nephrotoxic drugs. Permanent nephrotoxicity is related to cumulative dose. Nephrotoxicity can be ameliorated by hydration before amphotericin B infusion. Infusion-related fevers, chills, nausea, and vomiting occur less frequently in children than in adults. Onset occurs usually within 1 to 3 hours after the infusion is started, typical duration is <1 hour, and the febrile reactions tend to decrease in frequency over time. Pre-treatment with acetaminophen or diphenhydramine may alleviate febrile reactions. Idiosyncratic reactions, such as hypotension, arrhythmias, and allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, occur less frequently. Hepatic toxicity, thrombophlebitis, anemia, and rarely neurotoxicity (manifested as confusion or delirium, hearing loss, blurred vision, or seizures) also can occur.
Lipid formulations of amphotericin B have less acute and chronic toxicity than amphotericin B deoxycholate. In approximately 20% of children, lipid formulations of amphotericin B can cause acute, infusion-related reactions, including chest pain; dyspnea; hypoxia; severe pain in the abdomen, flank, or leg; or flushing and urticaria. Compared with infusion reactions with conventional amphotericin B, most (85%) of the reactions to the lipid formulations occur within the first 5 minutes after infusion and rapidly resolve with temporary interruption of the amphotericin B infusion and administration of IV diphenhydramine. Premedication with diphenhydramine can reduce the incidence of these reactions.
The echinocandins have an excellent safety profile. In a retrospective evaluation of 25 immunocompromised children who received caspofungin, the drug was well tolerated, although 3 patients had adverse events potentially related to the drug (hypokalemia in all 3 children, elevated bilirubin in 2, and decreased hemoglobin and elevated alanine aminotransferase in 1).41 In this study, children weighing <50 kg received 0.8 to 1.6 mg/kg body weight daily, and those weighing >50 kg received the adult dosage. In the PK study of 39 children who received caspofungin at 50 mg/m2 body surface area/day, 5 (13%) patients experienced one or more drug-related clinical adverse events, including 1 patient each with fever, diarrhea, phlebitis, proteinuria, and transient extremity rash. Two patients reported one or more drug-related laboratory adverse events, including one patient each with hypokalemia and increased serum aspartate transaminase. None of the drug-related adverse events in this study were considered serious or led to discontinuation of caspofungin.41 In a prospective multicenter trial for primary or salvage treatment of Candida and Aspergillus infections in 48 children aged 6 months to 17 years, a caspofungin dose of 50 mg/m2 per day (maximum: 70 mg/day; after 70 mg/m2 on day 1) was generally well tolerated with drug-related clinical and laboratory adverse events occurring in 26.5% and 34.7% of patients, respectively, similar to rates seen in adults. Drug-related clinical adverse events were typically mild and did not lead to therapy discontinuation. An increased level of hepatic transaminase, often occurring in the context of other medical conditions or concomitant therapies that may have contributed to elevations in hepatic enzymes, represented the most common drug-related laboratory adverse event. None of the drug-related laboratory adverse events led to therapy interruption or discontinuation.43
In a double-blind randomized trial comparing micafungin with liposomal amphotericin B (L-amB) in 48 children aged <16 years with clinical signs of systemic Candida infection or culture confirmation of Candida infection, a micafungin daily dose of 2 mg/kg of body weight for patients who weighed 40 kg and 100 mg for patients who weighed >40 kg was well tolerated. Adverse events were similar for both treatment arms and reflected those experienced by patients with comorbid conditions. These included sepsis, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia. Patients in the micafungin group experienced significantly fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation than those in the amphotericin B group (2/25 [3.8%] versus 9/54 [16.7%], respectively), suggesting a safety advantage for micafungin in this population. Two patients receiving micafungin experienced serious adverse events, including a worsening of renal failure, a preexisting condition, and a moderate increase in serum creatine resulting in discontinuation of therapy. Patients rarely experienced clinically meaningful changes in creatinine, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, or bilirubin during treatment. Children aged ≥2 years in the micafungin treatment arm experienced a smaller mean peak decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate than those in the L-amB arm.46
A multicenter, ascending-dosage study of anidulafungin in 25 HIV-uninfected neutropenic children aged 2 to 17 years showed anidulafungin to be well tolerated and observed no drug-related serious adverse events. Fever was observed in one patient with a National Cancer Institute toxicity grade of 3 and facial erythema was observed in another patient, which resolved after slowing the infusion rate.52
Immune reconstitution inflammatory response syndrome associated with Candida infection has not been described in HIV-infected children. However, evidence suggests that candidiasis (other than Candida esophagitis) occurs with increased frequency in adults during the first 2 months after initiation of cART.56
Managing Treatment Failure
Oropharyngeal and Esophageal CandidiasisIf OPC initially is treated topically, failure or relapse should be treated with oral fluconazole or itraconazole oral solution (AI*).27,57
Approximately 50% to 60% of patients with fluconazole-refractory OPC and 80% of patients with fluconazole-refractory esophageal candidiasis will respond to itraconazole solution (AII*).58,59 Posaconazole is a second-generation orally bioavailable triazole that has been effective in HIV-infected adults with azole-refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis.60 However, experience in children is limited, and an appropriate pediatric dosage has not been defined; thus data in children are insufficient to recommend its use in HIV-infected children (CIII).61,62
Amphotericin B (oral suspension at 1 mL four times daily of a 100-mg/mL suspension) sometimes has been effective in patients with OPC who do not respond to itraconazole solution; however, this product is not available in the United States (CIII).59 Low-dose IV amphotericin B (0.3–0.5 mg/kg/day) has been effective in children with refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis (BII).21,59,63,64
Experience is limited with use of echinocandins in treatment of azole-refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis in children (HIV-infected or -uninfected); however, given their excellent safety profile, the echinocandins61 could be considered for treatment of azole-refractory esophageal candidiasis (BIII).
Invasive DiseaseAlthough lipid formulations appear to be at least as effective as conventional amphotericin B for treating serious fungal infections,65,66 the drugs are considerably more expensive than conventional amphotericin B. However, the lipid formulations have less acute and chronic toxicity. Two lipid formulations are used: amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B lipid complex. Experience with these preparations in children is limited.67-69
For invasive candidiasis, amphotericin B lipid complex is administered as 5 mg/kg body weight IV once daily over 2 hours.67,68,70 Liposomal amphotericin B is administered IV as 3 to 5 mg/kg body weight once daily over 1 to 2 hours. The role of the echinocandins in invasive candidiasis has not been well studied in HIV-infected children. However, invasive candidiasis associated with neutropenia in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation has been treated successfully with this class of antifungals. These agents should be considered in treatment of invasive candidiasis but reserved as alternative, second-line therapy to currently available treatment modalities (CIII).
Preventing RecurrenceSecondary prophylaxis of recurrent OPC usually is not recommended because treatment of recurrence is typically effective, potential exists for development of resistance and drug interactions, and additional rounds of prophylaxis are costly (BIII). Immune reconstitution with cART in immunocompromised children should be a priority (AIII). However, if recurrences are severe, data from studies of HIV-infected adults with advanced disease on cART suggest that suppressive therapy with systemic azoles, either with oral fluconazole (BII*) or voriconazole or itraconazole solution (BII), can be considered.27,71-73 Potential azole resistance should be considered when long-term prophylaxis with azoles is used.
Experience with HIV-infected adults suggests that, in children with fluconazole-refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis who responded to voriconazole or posaconazole therapy or to echinocandins, continuing the effective drug as secondary prophylaxis can be considered because of the high relapse rate until cART produces immune reconstitution (BIII).
Discontinuing Secondary ProphylaxisIn situations when secondary prophylaxis is instituted, no data exist on which to base a recommendation regarding discontinuation. On the basis of experience with HIV-infected adults with other opportunistic infections, discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis can be considered when a patient’s CD4 count or percentage has risen to CDC Immunologic Category 2 or 1 (CIII).74
- Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, et al. Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. JAMA. Jul 19 2006;296(3):292-300. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16849662.
- Dankner WM, Lindsey JC, Levin MJ, Pediatric ACTGPT. Correlates of opportunistic infections in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus managed before highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Jan 2001;20(1):40-48. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11176565.
- Chiou CC, Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: clinical manifestations and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Aug 2000;19(8):729-734. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10959741.
- Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 1995;20(4):900-906. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7795092.
- Chiou CC, Groll AH, Mavrogiorgos N, Wood LV, Walsh TJ. Esophageal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pediatric patients after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. May 2002;21(5):388-392. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12150174.
- Leibovitz E, Rigaud M, Chandwani S, et al. Disseminated fungal infections in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Dec 1991;10(12):888-894. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1766703.
- Gonzalez CE, Venzon D, Lee S, Mueller BU, Pizzo PA, Walsh TJ. Risk factors for fungemia in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1996;23(3):515-521. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8991477.
- Krcmery V, Augustinova A, Babelova O, Doczeova A, Liskova A. Fungal resistance in Cambodian children with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. May 2006;25(5):470. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16645523.
- Stevens DA. Diagnosis of fungal infections: current status. J Antimicrob Chemother. Feb 2002;49 Suppl 1:11-19. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11801576.
- Sigmundsdottir G, Larsson L, Wiebe T, Bjorklund LJ, Christensson B. Clinical experience of urine D-arabinitol/L-arabinitol ratio in the early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in paediatric high risk populations. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(2):146-151. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17366032.
- Stradomska TJ, Sobielarska D, Mielniczuk Z, Jagiellowicz D, Syczewska M, Dzierzanowska D. Determination of urinary D-/L-arabinitol ratios as a biomarker for invasive candidiasis in children with cardiac diseases. J Med Microbiol. Dec 2010;59(Pt 12):1490-1496. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20724507.
- Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Invasive mycoses: diagnostic challenges. Am J Med. Jan 2012;125(1 Suppl):S14-24. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196205.
- Yeo SF, Huie S, Sofair AN, Campbell S, Durante A, Wong B. Measurement of serum D-arabinitol/creatinine ratios for initial diagnosis and for predicting outcome in an unselected, population-based sample of patients with Candida fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. Nov 2006;44(11):3894-3899. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16957030.
- Verduyn Lunel FM, Voss A, Kuijper EJ, et al. Detection of the Candida antigen mannan in cerebrospinal fluid specimens from patients suspected of having Candida meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. Feb 2004;42(2):867-870. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14766875.
- Mikulska M, Calandra T, Sanguinetti M, Poulain D, Viscoli C, Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia G. The use of mannan antigen and anti-mannan antibodies in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: recommendations from the Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Critical care. 2010;14(6):R222. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21143834.
- Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Alexander BD, Kett DH, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1-->3) beta-D-glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1 2005;41(5):654-659. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16080087.
- Del Bono V, Delfino E, Furfaro E, et al. Clinical performance of the (1,3)-beta-D-glucan assay in early diagnosis of nosocomial Candida bloodstream infections. Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI. Dec 2011;18(12):2113-2117. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21994353.
- Klingspor L, Jalal S. Molecular detection and identification of Candida and Aspergillus spp. from clinical samples using real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect. Aug 2006;12(8):745-753. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16842569.
- Avni T, Leibovici L, Paul M. PCR diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. Feb 2011;49(2):665-670. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106797.
- Pienaar ED, Young T, Holmes H. Interventions for the prevention and management of oropharyngeal candidiasis associated with HIV infection in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3(3):CD003940. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16856025.
- Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2009;48(5):503-535. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19191635.
- Pons V, Greenspan D, Debruin M. Therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: a randomized, prospective multicenter study of oral fluconazole versus clotrimazole troches. The Multicenter Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Dec 1993;6(12):1311-1316. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8254467.
- Pons V, Greenspan D, Lozada-Nur F, et al. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS: randomized comparison of fluconazole versus nystatin oral suspensions. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1997;24(6):1204-1207. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9195083.
- Lumbreras C, Cuervas-Mons V, Jara P, et al. Randomized trial of fluconazole versus nystatin for the prophylaxis of Candida infection following liver transplantation. J Infect Dis. Sep 1996;174(3):583-588. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8769617.
- Pelletier R, Peter J, Antin C, Gonzalez C, Wood L, Walsh TJ. Emergence of resistance of Candida albicans to clotrimazole in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children: in vitro and clinical correlations. J Clin Microbiol. Apr 2000;38(4):1563-1568. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10747144.
- Goins RA, Ascher D, Waecker N, Arnold J, Moorefield E. Comparison of fluconazole and nystatin oral suspensions for treatment of oral candidiasis in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Dec 2002;21(12):1165-1167. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12506950.
- Phillips P, De Beule K, Frechette G, et al. A double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole capsules for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1998;26(6):1368-1373. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9636865.
- Wilcox CM, Darouiche RO, Laine L, Moskovitz BL, Mallegol I, Wu J. A randomized, double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. J Infect Dis. Jul 1997;176(1):227-232. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9207371.
- Muller FM, Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections in children infected with human immuno deficiency virus. Eur J Pediatr. Mar 1999;158(3):187-199. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10094436.
- Reboli AC, Rotstein C, Pappas PG, et al. Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med. Jun 14 2007;356(24):2472-2482. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17568028.
- Dismukes WE. Introduction to antifungal drugs. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 2000;30(4):653-657. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10770726.
- Brammer KW, Coates PE. Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in pediatric patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Apr 1994;13(4):325-329. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8070441.
- Walsh TJ, Lutsar I, Driscoll T, et al. Voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis, scedosporiosis and other invasive fungal infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Mar 2002;21(3):240-248. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12005089.
- Walsh TJ, Karlsson MO, Driscoll T, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous voriconazole in children after single- or multiple-dose administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jun 2004;48(6):2166-2172. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15155217.
- Walsh TJ, Driscoll T, Milligan PA, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of voriconazole in immunocompromised children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Oct 2010;54(10):4116-4123. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20660687.
- Andes D, Pascual A, Marchetti O. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jan 2009;53(1):24-34. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18955533.
- Goldstein JA, de Morais SM. Biochemistry and molecular biology of the human CYP2C subfamily. Pharmacogenetics. Dec 1994;4(6):285-299. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7704034.
- Hyland R, Jones BC, Smith DA. Identification of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the N-oxidation of voriconazole. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals. May 2003;31(5):540-547. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12695341.
- Hoffman JA, Walsh TJ. Echinocandins in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Jun 2011;30(6):508-509. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21587028.
- Odio CM, Araya R, Pinto LE, et al. Caspofungin therapy of neonates with invasive candidiasis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Dec 2004;23(12):1093-1097. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15626944.
- Walsh TJ, Adamson PC, Seibel NL, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov 2005;49(11):4536-4545. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16251293.
- Merlin E, Galambrun C, Ribaud P, et al. Efficacy and safety of caspofungin therapy in children with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Dec 2006;25(12):1186-1188. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17133169.
- Zaoutis TE, Jafri HS, Huang LM, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of caspofungin for the treatment of documented Candida or Aspergillus infections in pediatric patients. Pediatrics. Mar 2009;123(3):877-884. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19255017.
- Maertens JA, Madero L, Reilly AF, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy in pediatric patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. May 2010;29(5):415-420. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20431381.
- Lehrnbecher T, Groll AH. Micafungin: a brief review of pharmacology, safety, and antifungal efficacy in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Aug 2010;55(2):229-232. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20583216.
- Queiroz-Telles F, Berezin E, Leverger G, et al. Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for pediatric patients with invasive candidiasis: substudy of a randomized double-blind trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Sep 2008;27(9):820-826. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18679151.
- Smith PB, Walsh TJ, Hope W, et al. Pharmacokinetics of an elevated dosage of micafungin in premature neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J. May 2009;28(5):412-415. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19319022.
- Benjamin DK, Jr., Smith PB, Arrieta A, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of repeat-dose micafungin in young infants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. Jan 2010;87(1):93-99. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19890251.
- Cornely OA, Marty FM, Stucker F, Pappas PG, Ullmann AJ. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for treatment of serious Candida infections in patients with or without malignant disease. Mycoses. Nov 2011;54(6):e838-847. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21668522.
- Hope WW, Smith PB, Arrieta A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in neonates and young infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jun 2010;54(6):2633-2637. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20308367.
- Heresi GP, Gerstmann DR, Reed MD, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Dec 2006;25(12):1110-1115. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17133155.
- Benjamin DK, Jr., Driscoll T, Seibel NL, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in children with neutropenia at high risk for invasive fungal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Feb 2006;50(2):632-638. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16436720.
- Varisco BM, Benner KW, Prabhakaran P. Neonatal peritoneal candidiasis successfully treated with anidulafungin add-on therapy. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. Nov 2009;43(11):1907-1910. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826094.
- Blyth CC, Palasanthiran P, O'Brien TA. Antifungal therapy in children with invasive fungal infections: a systematic review. Pediatrics. Apr 2007;119(4):772-784. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17403849.
- Johnson LB, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1 2003;36(5):630-637. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12594645.
- Nacher M, Vantilcke V, Huber F, et al. Increased incidence of mucosal candidiasis after HAART initiation: a benign form of immune reconstitution disease? AIDS. Nov 30 2007;21(18):2534-2536. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18025892.
- Groll AH, Wood L, Roden M, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cyclodextrin itraconazole in pediatric patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Aug 2002;46(8):2554-2563. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12121932.
- Phillips P, Zemcov J, Mahmood W, Montaner JS, Craib K, Clarke AM. Itraconazole cyclodextrin solution for fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis in AIDS: correlation of clinical response with in vitro susceptibility. AIDS. Oct 1996;10(12):1369-1376. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8902066.
- Fichtenbaum CJ, Powderly WG. Refractory mucosal candidiasis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 1998;26(3):556-565. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9524822.
- Skiest DJ, Vazquez JA, Anstead GM, et al. Posaconazole for the treatment of azole-refractory oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in subjects with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 15 2007;44(4):607-614. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17243069.
- Zaoutis TE, Benjamin DK, Steinbach WJ. Antifungal treatment in pediatric patients. Drug Resist Updat. Aug 2005;8(4):235-245. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16054422.
- Krishna G, Sansone-Parsons A, Martinho M, Kantesaria B, Pedicone L. Posaconazole plasma concentrations in juvenile patients with invasive fungal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Mar 2007;51(3):812-818. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17210771.
- Lake DE, Kunzweiler J, Beer M, Buell DN, Islam MZ. Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in cancer patients. Chemotherapy. Jul-Aug 1996;42(4):308-314. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8804799.
- Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jan 1995;39(1):1-8. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7695288.
- Walsh TJ, Whitcomb P, Piscitelli S, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in children with hepatosplenic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Sep 1997;41(9):1944-1948. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9303390.
- Wiley JM, Seibel NL, Walsh TJ. Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B lipid complex in 548 children and adolescents with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Feb 2005;24(2):167-174. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15702047.
- Walsh TJ, Seibel NL, Arndt C, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex in pediatric patients with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Aug 1999;18(8):702-708. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10462340.
- Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. Mar 11 1999;340(10):764-771. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10072411.
- Linden P, Lee L, Walsh TJ. Retrospective analysis of the dosage of amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Pharmacotherapy. Nov 1999;19(11):1261-1268. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10555932.
- Tollemar J, Klingspor L, Ringden O. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) for fungal infections in immunocompromised adults and children. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7 Suppl 2:68-79. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525221.
- Ally R, Schurmann D, Kreisel W, et al. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial of voriconazole and fluconazole in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. Nov 1 2001;33(9):1447-1454. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11577374.
- Vazquez JA. Optimal management of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in patients living with HIV infection. Hiv/Aids. 2010;2:89-101. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22096388.
- Goldman M, Cloud GA, Wade KD, et al. with AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 323/Mycoses Study Group Study 40. A randomized study of the use of fluconazole in continuous versus episodic therapy in patients with advanced HIV infection and a history of oropharyngeal candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1473-1480. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16231260&query_hl=171&itool=pubmed_docsum.
- CDC C. Revised classification system for human immunodeficiency virus infection in children less than 13 years of age. Official authorized addenda: human immunodeficiency virus infection codes and official guidelines for coding and reporting ICD-9-CM. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43:1-19. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4312.pdf.
|Indication||First Choice||Alternative||Comments/Special Issues|
||Not routinely recommended||N/A
||Not routinely recommended, but can be considered for frequent severe recurrences.
||N/A||Secondary Prophylaxis Indicated:
||Itraconazole oral solution should not be used interchangeably with itraconazole capsules. Itraconazole capsules are generally ineffective for treatment of esophageal disease.
Central venous catheters should be removed, when feasible, in HIV-infected children with fungemia.
In uncomplicated catheter-associated C. albicans candidemia, an initial course of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole to complete treatment can be used (use invasive disease dosing).
Voriconazole has been used to treat esophageal candidiasis in a small number of HIV-uninfected immunocompromised children.
Voriconazole Dosing in Pediatric Patients
|Key to Abbreviations: CD4 = CD4 T lymphocyte; CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; IV = intravenous; PK = pharmacokinetic|